Literature DB >> 19815927

A learned flavor preference persists despite the extinction of conditioned hedonic reactions to the cue flavors.

Dominic M Dwyer1, Hannah L Pincham, Thida Thein, Justin A Harris.   

Abstract

Learned flavor preferences can be strikingly persistent in the face of behavioral extinction. Harris, Shand, Carroll, and Westbrook (2004) suggested that this persistence may be due to flavor preference conditioning's producing a long-lasting change in the hedonic response to the conditioned stimulus (CS+) flavor. In the present study, the CS+ flavor was presented in simultaneous compound with 16% sucrose, whereas the CS- flavor was presented with 2% sucrose. During subsequent two- and one-bottle tests, the CS+ and CS- flavors were presented in 2% sucrose. Hedonic reactions during training and test were assessed using an analysis of the microstructure of licking behavior. Conditioning resulted in greater consumption of the CS+ than of the CS- that did not extinguish over repeated two- and one-bottle tests. The mean lick cluster size was higher for the CS+ than for the CS- only on the first cycle of tests. Since lick cluster size can be used as an index of stimulus palatability, the present results indicate that although the hedonic reaction to the CSs did change, this was not maintained across repeated tests. Thus, changes in the hedonic response to the conditioned flavors cannot explain the resistance to the extinction of learned flavor preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19815927     DOI: 10.3758/LB.37.4.305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  22 in total

1.  Reinforcer devaluation in palatability-based learned flavor preferences.

Authors:  D M Dwyer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2005-10

2.  Extinction of a saccharin-lithium association: assessment by consumption and taste reactivity.

Authors:  Raúl Cantora; Matías López; Luis Aguado; Shadna Rana; Linda A Parker
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Expression of flavor preference depends on type of test and on recent drinking history.

Authors:  Robert A Boakes; Lucy Albertella; Justin A Harris
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2007-07

4.  Extinction of conditioned flavor preferences.

Authors:  Andrew R Delamater
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2007-04

5.  Conditioned acceptance and preference but not altered taste reactivity responses to bitter and sour flavors paired with intragastric glucose infusion.

Authors:  Kevin P Myers; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2003-02

6.  Persistence of preference for a flavor presented in simultaneous compound with sucrose.

Authors:  Justin A Harris; Fiona L Shand; Louisa Q Carroll; R Frederick Westbrook
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2004-07

7.  Microstructural analysis of ingestive behaviour reveals no contribution of palatability to the incomplete extinction of a conditioned taste aversion.

Authors:  Dominic M Dwyer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Microstructural analysis of conditioned and unconditioned responses to maltodextrin.

Authors:  Dominic M Dwyer
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Microstructural analysis of successive negative contrast in free-feeding and deprived rats.

Authors:  P S Grigson; A C Spector; R Norgren
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1993-11

10.  Analytical issues in the evaluation of food deprivation and sucrose concentration effects on the microstructure of licking behavior in the rat.

Authors:  A C Spector; P A Klumpp; J M Kaplan
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.912

View more
  10 in total

1.  Posttraining flavor exposure in hungry rats after simultaneous conditioning with a nutrient converts the CS into a conditioned inhibitor.

Authors:  David Garcia-Burgos; Felisa González
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Nonreinforced flavor exposure attenuates the effects of conditioned taste aversion on both flavor consumption and cue palatability.

Authors:  Dominic Michael Dwyer; Patricia Gasalla; Matías López
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Partial reinforcement and latent inhibition effects on stimulus-outcome associations in flavor preference conditioning.

Authors:  Andrew R Delamater
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Associative learning contributes to the increased water intake observed after daily injections of angiotensin II.

Authors:  Maggie Postolache; Jessica Santollo; Derek Daniels
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-07-04

Review 5.  Characterizing ingestive behavior through licking microstructure: Underlying neurobiology and its use in the study of obesity in animal models.

Authors:  Alexander W Johnson
Journal:  Int J Dev Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.457

Review 6.  On the nature of CS and US representations in Pavlovian learning.

Authors:  Andrew R Delamater
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Examining the influence of CS duration and US density on cue-potentiated feeding through analyses of licking microstructure.

Authors:  Alexander W Johnson
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2018-02

8.  Unconscious learning of likes and dislikes is persistent, resilient, and reconsolidates.

Authors:  Alex Pine; Avi Mendelsohn; Yadin Dudai
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-06

9.  Contexts control negative contrast and restrict the expression of flavor preference conditioning.

Authors:  Joseph M Austen; David J Sanderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.478

10.  The origins of individual differences in how learning is expressed in rats: A general-process perspective.

Authors:  E Patitucci; A J D Nelson; Dominic M Dwyer; R C Honey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.478

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.