Literature DB >> 23813056

Nonreinforced flavor exposure attenuates the effects of conditioned taste aversion on both flavor consumption and cue palatability.

Dominic Michael Dwyer1, Patricia Gasalla, Matías López.   

Abstract

Nonreinforced exposure to a cue tends to attenuate subsequent conditioning with that cue-an effect referred to as latent inhibition (LI). In the two experiments reported here, we examined LI effects in the context of conditioned taste aversion by examining both the amount of consumption and the microstructure of the consummatory behavior (in terms of the mean size of lick clusters). The latter measure can be taken to reflect affective responses to, or the palatability of, the solution being consumed. In both experiments, exposure to a to-be-conditioned flavor prior to pairing the flavor with nausea produced by lithium chloride attenuated both the reduction in consumption and the reduction in lick cluster sizes typically produced by taste aversion learning. In addition, we observed a tendency (especially in the lick cluster measure) for nonreinforced exposure to reduce neophobic responses to the test flavors. Taken together, these results reinforce the suggestion from previous experiments using taste reactivity methods that LI attenuates the effects of taste aversion on both consumption and cue palatability. The present results also support the suggestion that the failure in previous studies to see concurrent LI effects on consumption and palatability was due to a context specificity produced by the oral taste infusion methods required for taste reactivity analyses. Finally, the fact that the pattern of extinction of conditioned changes in consumption and in lick cluster sizes was not affected by preexposure to the cue flavors suggests that LI influenced the quantity but not the quality of conditioned taste aversion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23813056     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-013-0114-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  29 in total

1.  Extinction of a saccharin-lithium association: assessment by consumption and taste reactivity.

Authors:  Raúl Cantora; Matías López; Luis Aguado; Shadna Rana; Linda A Parker
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Context specificity of latent inhibition in taste aversion learning.

Authors:  G Hall; S Channell
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1986-05

3.  Reduced palatability in drug-induced taste aversion: I. Variations in the initial value of the conditioned stimulus.

Authors:  Jian-You Lin; Joe Arthurs; Leslie Renee Amodeo; Steve Reilly
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Increased liking for a solution is not necessary for the attenuation of neophobia in rats.

Authors:  Karly N Neath; Cheryl L Limebeer; Steve Reilly; Linda A Parker
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 5.  The microstructure of ingestive behavior.

Authors:  J D Davis
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  The effectiveness of some sugars in stimulating licking behavior in the rat.

Authors:  J D Davis
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1973-07

7.  Taste neophobia and palatability: the pleasure of drinking.

Authors:  Jian-You Lin; Leslie Renee Amodeo; Joseph Arthurs; Steve Reilly
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-03-29

8.  The acquired control of ingestive behavior in the rat by flavor-associated postingestional stimulation.

Authors:  J D Davis; M C Perez
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1993-12

9.  Microstructural analysis of ingestive behaviour reveals no contribution of palatability to the incomplete extinction of a conditioned taste aversion.

Authors:  Dominic M Dwyer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Analytical issues in the evaluation of food deprivation and sucrose concentration effects on the microstructure of licking behavior in the rat.

Authors:  A C Spector; P A Klumpp; J M Kaplan
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.912

View more
  1 in total

1.  Handling method alters the hedonic value of reward in laboratory mice.

Authors:  Jasmine M Clarkson; Dominic M Dwyer; Paul A Flecknell; Matthew C Leach; Candy Rowe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.