Literature DB >> 8248382

Microstructural analysis of successive negative contrast in free-feeding and deprived rats.

P S Grigson1, A C Spector, R Norgren.   

Abstract

Rats shifted from 1.0 M to 0.1 M sucrose lick at lower rates for the weaker solution than rats that have continual access to the 0.1 M sucrose solution only. This effect, referred to as successive negative contrast, has been investigated primarily in food-deprived rats and, in all cases, using total licks or total volume consumed as the dependent measure. The present experiment used a microstructural analysis of licking patterns to examine the changes in behavior that constitute the contrast effect in total licks in both deprived and free-feeding rats. Although the magnitude of the effect was similar, deprived rats recovered from contrast more rapidly than free-feeding rats. Furthermore, the patterns of licking behavior associated with contrast differed under the two deprivation conditions. Specifically, when compared with the unshifted controls, the contrast effect in deprived rats was accomplished through a decrease in the number of licks per burst, an increase in the number of bursts initiated, a brief increase in the length of the interburst intervals, and no change in length of the interlick intervals. In free-feeding animals, contrast was associated with a decrease in the number of licks per burst, a brief increase in the length of the interburst interval, and no changes in either the number of bursts initiated or in the length of the interlick intervals. Together, these data demonstrate that patterns of licking behavior are differentially affected by solution concentration, deprivation state, and relative aspects of reward value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8248382     DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(93)90301-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  19 in total

1.  Susceptibility to traumatic stress sensitizes the dopaminergic response to cocaine and increases motivation for cocaine.

Authors:  Zachary D Brodnik; Emily M Black; Meagan J Clark; Kristen N Kornsey; Nathaniel W Snyder; Rodrigo A España
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.250

2.  Reduced palatability in drug-induced taste aversion: II. Aversive and rewarding unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  Joe Arthurs; Jian-You Lin; Leslie Renee Amodeo; Steve Reilly
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Taste responsiveness to sweeteners is resistant to elevations in plasma leptin.

Authors:  John I Glendinning; Amanda E T Elson; Salina Kalik; Yvett Sosa; Christa M Patterson; Martin G Myers; Steven D Munger
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Relative reward effects on operant behavior: Incentive contrast, induction and variety effects.

Authors:  E S Webber; N E Chambers; J A Kostek; D E Mankin; H C Cromwell
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Lewis rats are more sensitive than Fischer rats to successive negative contrast, but less sensitive to the anxiolytic and appetite-stimulating effects of chlordiazepoxide.

Authors:  Christopher S Freet; Jason D Tesche; Dennie M Tompers; Katherine E Riegel; Patricia S Grigson
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 3.533

6.  Taste dysfunction in BTBR mice due to a mutation of Itpr3, the inositol triphosphate receptor 3 gene.

Authors:  Michael G Tordoff; Hillary T Ellis
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.107

7.  Oxytocin decreases sweet taste sensitivity in mice.

Authors:  Michael S Sinclair; Isabel Perea-Martinez; Marianne Abouyared; Steven J St John; Nirupa Chaudhari
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-30

8.  Intermittent access to preferred food reduces the reinforcing efficacy of chow in rats.

Authors:  Pietro Cottone; Valentina Sabino; Luca Steardo; Eric P Zorrilla
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 3.619

9.  Consummatory, anxiety-related and metabolic adaptations in female rats with alternating access to preferred food.

Authors:  Pietro Cottone; Valentina Sabino; Luca Steardo; Eric P Zorrilla
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 4.905

10.  A learned flavor preference persists despite the extinction of conditioned hedonic reactions to the cue flavors.

Authors:  Dominic M Dwyer; Hannah L Pincham; Thida Thein; Justin A Harris
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.