Literature DB >> 19815926

Animal memory: the contribution of generalization decrement to delayed conditional discrimination retention functions.

Rebecca Rayburn-Reeves1, Thomas R Zentall.   

Abstract

Delayed conditional discriminations in which a sample indicates which comparison stimulus is correct have typically been used in working memory research with animals. Following acquisition with no (0-sec) delay between the offset of the sample and the onset of the comparison stimuli, delays of variable duration are introduced. The resulting retention functions are taken as a measure of memory. We suggest that, in addition to memory loss due to the delay, the comparison of matching accuracy at the 0-sec training delay with relatively novel test delays may produce a generalization decrement that varies as a function of increasing delay. We tested this hypothesis by training pigeons with a mixed delay procedure from the start and found that the retention functions for these pigeons were significantly shallower than those for a control group trained with 0-sec delays and tested with longer delays, and, although reduced in magnitude, the differences persisted for as many as 15 sessions. We propose that a measure of animals' working memory can be obtained uninfluenced by a generalization decrement if they have received comparable training with all of the delays that are tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19815926     DOI: 10.3758/LB.37.4.299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  10 in total

1.  Development of a single-code/default coding strategy in pigeons.

Authors:  T S Clement; T R Zentall
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-05

2.  Generalization of delayed matching to sample following training at different delays.

Authors:  R J Sargisson; K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Stimulus generalization, context change, and forgetting.

Authors:  M E Bouton; J B Nelson; J M Rosas
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Delayed matching in the pigeon.

Authors:  D S BLOUGH
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Acquisition of delayed matching in the pigeon.

Authors:  R Berryman; W W Cumming; J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Characteristics of forgetting functions in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Pigeons' memory for sequences of light flashes: reliance on temporal properties and evidence for delay interval/gap confusion.

Authors:  Angelo Santi; Jennifer Lellwitz; Stephen Gagne
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Effects of differential reinforcement expectancies on successive matching-to-sample performance in pigeons.

Authors:  R E DeLong; E A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1981-10

9.  Use of a single-code/default strategy by pigeons to acquire duration sample discriminations.

Authors:  Rebecca A Singer; Emily D Klein; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  Preserved recognition memory for small sets, and impaired stimulus identification for large sets, following rhinal cortex ablations in monkeys.

Authors:  M J Eacott; D Gaffan; E A Murray
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  1994-09-01       Impact factor: 3.386

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Reversing the signaled magnitude effect in delayed matching to sample: delay-specific remembering.

Authors:  K Geoffrey White; Glenn S Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Reversing the course of forgetting.

Authors:  K Geoffrey White; Glenn S Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Rats exhibit asymmetrical retention functions for hedonic and nonhedonic samples in many-to-one symbolic delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  Angelo Santi; Sabrina Simmons; Shannon Mischler; Claire Hoover
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Generalizability of time-based interventions: Effects of choice procedure and smaller-sooner delay.

Authors:  Travis R Smith; Kelsey Panfil; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 1.777

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.