Literature DB >> 19815785

A stereo disadvantage for recognizing rotated familiar objects.

Achille Pasqualotto1, William G Hayward.   

Abstract

We tested recognition of familiar objects in two different conditions: mono, where stimuli were displayed as flat, 2-D images, and stereo, where objects were displayed with stereoscopic depth information. In three experiments, participants performed a sequential matching task, where an object was rotated by up to 180 degrees between presentations. When the 180 degrees rotation resulted in large changes in depth for object components, recognition performance in the mono condition showed better performance at 180 degrees rotations than at smaller rotations, but stereo presentations showed a monotonic increase in response time with rotation. However, 180 degrees rotations that did not result in much depth variation showed similar patterns of results for mono and stereo conditions. These results suggest that in some circumstances, the lack of explicit 3-D information in 2-D images may influence the recognition of familiar objects when they are depicted on flat computer monitors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19815785     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  14 in total

1.  Recognizing silhouettes and shaded images across depth rotation.

Authors:  W G Hayward; M J Tarr; A K Corderoy
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  S Edelman; H H Bülthoff
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  What determines visual cue reliability?

Authors:  Robert A. Jacobs
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Recognizing novel views of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  G K Humphrey; S C Khan
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1992-06

5.  The visual perception of 3-D shape from multiple cues: are observers capable of perceiving metric structure?

Authors:  James T Todd; J Farley Norman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-01

6.  Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination.

Authors:  James M Hillis; Simon J Watt; Michael S Landy; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Are face representations viewpoint dependent? A stereo advantage for generalizing across different views of faces.

Authors:  Darren Burke; Jessica Taubert; Talia Higman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis.

Authors:  E B Johnston
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  M J Tarr
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-03

10.  Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant?

Authors:  David C Knill; Jeffrey A Saunders
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  2 in total

1.  Learning the 3-D structure of objects from 2-D views depends on shape, not format.

Authors:  Moqian Tian; Daniel Yamins; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Stereo viewing modulates three-dimensional shape processing during object recognition: A high-density ERP study.

Authors:  Zoe J Oliver; Filipe Cristino; Mark V Roberts; Alan J Pegna; E Charles Leek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.332

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.