Literature DB >> 17572467

Are face representations viewpoint dependent? A stereo advantage for generalizing across different views of faces.

Darren Burke1, Jessica Taubert, Talia Higman.   

Abstract

Almost all previous studies of face recognition have found that matching the same face depicted from different viewpoints incurs both reaction time and accuracy costs. This has been interpreted as evidence that the underlying neural representations of faces are viewpoint-specific, but such a conclusion depends on the experimental data being an accurate reflection of real-world viewpoint generalisation. An equally plausible explanation for poor viewpoint generalisation in experimental situations is that important information that is normally used to generalize across views in real-world settings is not available in the experiment. Stereoscopic information about the three-dimensional structure of the face is systematically misleading in nearly all previous investigations of face recognition, since a face depicted on a computer monitor contains explicit stereoscopic information that the face is flat. The current experiment demonstrates that viewpoint costs are reduced by depicting the face with stereoscopic three-dimensionality (compared to a synoptically presented face), raising the possibility that the viewpoint costs found in face recognition experiments might be a better reflection of the information that is typically unavailable in the experimental stimuli than of the underlying neural representation of facial identity.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17572467     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  12 in total

1.  Measuring sensitivity to viewpoint change with and without stereoscopic cues.

Authors:  Jason Bell; Edwin Dickinson; David R Badcock; Frederick A A Kingdom
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  A stereo disadvantage for recognizing rotated familiar objects.

Authors:  Achille Pasqualotto; William G Hayward
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

3.  Functional architecture for disparity in macaque inferior temporal cortex and its relationship to the architecture for faces, color, scenes, and visual field.

Authors:  Bram-Ernst Verhoef; Kaitlin S Bohon; Bevil R Conway
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  On the contribution of binocular disparity to the long-term memory for natural scenes.

Authors:  Matteo Valsecchi; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Visual adaptation and face perception.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Donald I A MacLeod
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Stereoscopic Offset Makes Objects Easier to Recognize.

Authors:  Baptiste Caziot; Benjamin T Backus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Stereoscopy Amplifies Emotions Elicited by Facial Expressions.

Authors:  Jussi Hakala; Jari Kätsyri; Jukka Häkkinen
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2015-11-20

8.  Taking the Perfect Selfie: Investigating the Impact of Perspective on the Perception of Higher Cognitive Variables.

Authors:  Tobias M Schneider; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-09

9.  Use of 3D faces facilitates facial expression recognition in children.

Authors:  Lamei Wang; Wenfeng Chen; Hong Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The role of binocular disparity in rapid scene and pattern recognition.

Authors:  Matteo Valsecchi; Baptiste Caziot; Benjamin T Backus; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.