Literature DB >> 12140085

What determines visual cue reliability?

Robert A. Jacobs1.   

Abstract

Visual environments contain many cues to properties of an observed scene. To integrate information provided by multiple cues in an efficient manner, observers must assess the degree to which each cue provides reliable versus unreliable information. Two hypotheses are reviewed regarding how observers estimate cue reliabilities, namely that the estimated reliability of a cue is related to the ambiguity of the cue, and that people use correlations among cues to estimate cue reliabilities. Cue reliabilities are shown to be important both for cue combination and for aspects of visual learning.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 12140085     DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01948-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  35 in total

1.  Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; John J van den Dobbelsteen; Denise D J de Grave; Robert J van Beers; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Representation and integration of auditory and visual stimuli in the primate ventral lateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Lizabeth M Romanski
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  The temporal dynamics of ambiguity resolution: Evidence from spoken-word recognition.

Authors:  Delphine Dahan; M Gareth Gaskell
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  A stereo disadvantage for recognizing rotated familiar objects.

Authors:  Achille Pasqualotto; William G Hayward
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

5.  Illusory visual-depth reversal can modulate sensations of contact surface.

Authors:  Yuka Igarashi; Keiko Omori; Tetsuya Arai; Yasunori Aizawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Separate streams or probabilistic inference? What the N400 can tell us about the comprehension of events.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  What Are You Waiting For? Real-Time Integration of Cues for Fricatives Suggests Encapsulated Auditory Memory.

Authors:  Marcus E Galle; Jamie Klein-Packard; Kayleen Schreiber; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-01

8.  Separating the contributions of primary and unwanted cues in psychophysical studies.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Beyond naïve cue combination: salience and social cues in early word learning.

Authors:  Daniel Yurovsky; Michael C Frank
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2015-11-17

10.  Within- and cross-modal distance information disambiguate visual size-change perception.

Authors:  Peter W Battaglia; Massimiliano Di Luca; Marc O Ernst; Paul R Schrater; Tonja Machulla; Daniel Kersten
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.