Literature DB >> 19810503

Spatial registration of temporally separated whole breast 3D ultrasound images.

Ganesh Narayanasamy1, Gerald L LeCarpentier, Marilyn Roubidoux, J Brian Fowlkes, Anne F Schott, Paul L Carson.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential for use of image volume based registration (IVBaR) to aid in measurement of changes in the tumor during chemotherapy of breast cancer. Successful IVBaR could aid in the detection of such changes in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and potentially be useful for routine breast cancer screening and diagnosis. IVBaR was employed in a new method of automated estimation of tumor volume in studies following the radiologist identification of the tumor region in the prechemotherapy scan. The authors have also introduced a new semiautomated method for validation of registration based on Doppler ultrasound (U.S.) signals that are independent of the grayscale signals used for registration. This Institutional Review Board approved study was conducted on 10 patients undergoing chemotherapy and 14 patients with a suspicious/unknown mass scheduled to undergo biopsy. Reasonably reproducible mammographic positioning and nearly whole breast U.S. imaging were achieved. The image volume was registered offline with a mutual information cost function and global interpolation based on a thin-plate spline using MIAMI FUSE software developed at the University of Michigan. The success and accuracy of registration of the three dimensional (3D) U.S. image volume were measured by means of mean registration error (MRE). IVBaR was successful with MRE of 4.3 +/- 1.7 mm in 9 out of 10 reproducibility automated breast ultrasound (ABU) studies and in 12 out of 17 ABU image pairs collected before, during, or after 115 +/- 14 days of chemotherapy. Semiautomated tumor volume estimation was performed on registered image volumes giving 86 +/- 8% mean accuracy compared to the radiologist hand-segmented tumor volume on seven cases. Doppler studies yielded fractional volume of color pixels in the region surrounding the lesion and its change with changing breast compression. The Doppler study of patients with detectable blood flow included five patients with suspicious masses and three undergoing chemotherapy. Spatial alignment of the 3D blood vessel data from the Doppler studies provided independent measures for the validation of registration. In 15 Doppler image volume pairs scanned with differing breast compression, the mean centerline separation value was 1.5 +/- 0.6 mm, while MRE based on a few identifiable structural points common to the two grayscale image volumes was 1.1 +/- 0.6 mm. Another measure, the overlap ratio of blood vessels, was shown to increase from 0.32 to 0.59 (+84%) with IVBaR for pairs at various compression levels. These results show that successful registration of ABU scans may be accomplished for comparison and integration of information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19810503      PMCID: PMC2749445          DOI: 10.1118/1.3193678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  47 in total

1.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 2.  Rationale for a trial of screening breast ultrasound: American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6666.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Combination of digital mammography with semi-automated 3D breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Ajay Kapur; Paul L Carson; Jeffrey Eberhard; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Kai Thomenius; Murtuza Lokhandwalla; Donald Buckley; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Mark A Helvie; Rebecca C Booi; Gerald L LeCarpentier; Ramon Q Erkamp; Heang-Ping Chan; J Brian Fowlkes; Jerry A Thomas; Cynthia E Landberg
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-08

4.  MRI measurements of breast tumor volume predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence-free survival.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Jessica E Gibbs; Ying Lu; Laura J Esserman; Debasish Tripathy; Dulcy S Wolverton; Hope S Rugo; E Shelley Hwang; Cheryl A Ewing; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Objective assessment of deformable image registration in radiotherapy: a multi-institution study.

Authors:  Rojano Kashani; Martina Hub; James M Balter; Marc L Kessler; Lei Dong; Lifei Zhang; Lei Xing; Yaoqin Xie; David Hawkes; Julia A Schnabel; Jamie McClelland; Sarang Joshi; Quan Chen; Weiguo Lu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Demonstration of accuracy and clinical versatility of mutual information for automatic multimodality image fusion using affine and thin-plate spline warped geometric deformations.

Authors:  C R Meyer; J L Boes; B Kim; P H Bland; K R Zasadny; P V Kison; K Koral; K A Frey; R L Wahl
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 7.  How reliable is modern breast imaging in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions in the symptomatic population?

Authors:  H A Moss; P D Britton; C D Flower; A H Freeman; D J Lomas; R M Warren
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  Registration of three-dimensional compound ultrasound scans of the breast for refraction and motion correction.

Authors:  A Moskalik; P L Carson; C R Meyer; J B Fowlkes; J M Rubin; M A Roubidoux
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Ultrasound as a complement to mammography and breast examination to characterize breast masses.

Authors:  Kenneth J W Taylor; Christopher Merritt; Catherine Piccoli; Robert Schmidt; Glenn Rouse; Bruno Fornage; Eva Rubin; Dianne Georgian-Smith; Fred Winsberg; Barry Goldberg; Ellen Mendelson
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Suspicious breast lesions: assessment of 3D Doppler US indexes for classification in a test population and fourfold cross-validation scheme.

Authors:  Gerald L LeCarpentier; Marilyn A Roubidoux; J Brian Fowlkes; Jochen F Krücker; Karen A Hunt; Chintana Paramagul; Timothy D Johnson; Nancy J Thorson; Karen D Engle; Paul L Carson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  4 in total

1.  Improved digital breast tomosynthesis images using automated ultrasound.

Authors:  Xing Zhang; Jie Yuan; Sidan Du; Oliver D Kripfgans; Xueding Wang; Paul L Carson; Xiaojun Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Automated Breast Ultrasound: Dual-Sided Compared with Single-Sided Imaging.

Authors:  Eric D Larson; Won-Mean Lee; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Mitchel M Goodsitt; Chris Lashbrook; Fouzaan Zafar; Oliver D Kripfgans; Kai Thomenius; Paul L Carson
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Development of a surgical algorithm by using pre-operative imaging to predict mammoplasty cosmetic outcomes for large non-malignant tumours.

Authors:  Geok-Hoon Lim; Ruey Pyng Ng; Lester Chee Hao Leong
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-12

4.  M3VR-A multi-stage, multi-resolution, and multi-volumes-of-interest volume registration method applied to 3D endovaginal ultrasound.

Authors:  Qi Xing; Parag Chitnis; Siddhartha Sikdar; Jonia Alshiek; S Abbas Shobeiri; Qi Wei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.