Literature DB >> 19808949

Evaluation of clinical dry weight assessment in haemodialysis patients using bioimpedance spectroscopy: a cross-sectional study.

Jens Passauer1, Helga Petrov, Andreas Schleser, Joachim Leicht, Klaus Pucalka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dry weight assessment (DWA) is essential to efficient therapy of haemodialysis (HD) patients. However, so far objective methods for DWA have not been applicable to daily routine. Thus, exact fluid management in HD remains difficult and is often based on clinical criteria. The aims of this study were (1) to objectively define pre- and post-dialytic ranges of extracellular volume in a large cohort of HD patients (in whom DWA had been defined according to clinical criteria), (2) to compare the hydration status between diabetic and non-diabetic patients, and (3) to assess a patient subgroup that might benefit from correction of target weight.
METHODS: We measured fluid overload (FO) prior to a mid-week HD session in 370 randomly selected HD patients (50% with diabetes) from five dialysis centres. A new bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) device that implies a validated body composition model was applied. This tool allows correct quantification of extracellular FO or - deficiency in comparison to a healthy reference population (normal range -1.1 to 1.1 L according to the 10th and 90th percentile of measurements). In addition, weight and blood pressure were recorded before and after treatment.
RESULTS: Pre-dialytic FO ranged from -0.5 to 4 L and post-dialytic FO from -2.5 to 2 L (10th and 90th percentile of measurements), indicating that on average the hydration status of healthy subjects is considered as the optimal target weight in HD patients. Comparison of FO between diabetic and non-diabetic patients revealed no difference. Based on the consideration that an FO < -1.1 L before and >1.1 L after HD indicates inadequate DWA, we identified 98 (26%) patients who might benefit from correction of target body weight.
CONCLUSION: BIS is an interesting, objective method to support clinical DWA. Further studies should be performed to investigate beneficial clinical effects of this approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19808949     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfp517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  41 in total

1.  Influence of peritoneal dialysis solution on measurements of fluid status by bioimpedance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Simon Paul Parmentier; Holger Schirutschke; Bertram Schmitt; Jens Schewe; Kay Herbrig; Frank Pistrosch; Jens Passauer
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  The association between arterial stiffness and fluid status in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Ismail Kocyigit; Murat Hayri Sipahioglu; Ozcan Orscelik; Aydin Unal; Ahmet Celik; Samer R Abbas; Fansan Zhu; Bulent Tokgoz; Ali Dogan; Oktay Oymak; Peter Kotanko; Nathan W Levin
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  Lung ultrasound during hemodialysis: the role in the assessment of volume status.

Authors:  Nicola Vitturi; Mauro Dugo; Marta Soattin; Francesco Simoni; Luisa Maresca; Riccardo Zagatti; Maria Cristina Maresca
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Body composition and survival in dialysis patients: results from an international cohort study.

Authors:  Daniele Marcelli; Len A Usvyat; Peter Kotanko; Inga Bayh; Bernard Canaud; Michael Etter; Emanuele Gatti; Aileen Grassmann; Yuedong Wang; Cristina Marelli; Laura Scatizzi; Andrea Stopper; Frank M van der Sande; Jeroen Kooman
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 5.  The Use of a Multidimensional Measure of Dialysis Adequacy-Moving beyond Small Solute Kinetics.

Authors:  Jeffrey Perl; Laura M Dember; Joanne M Bargman; Teri Browne; David M Charytan; Jennifer E Flythe; LaTonya J Hickson; Adriana M Hung; Michel Jadoul; Timmy Chang Lee; Klemens B Meyer; Hamid Moradi; Tariq Shafi; Isaac Teitelbaum; Leslie P Wong; Christopher T Chan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Long-term intradialytic hybrid exercise training on fatigue symptoms in patients receiving hemodialysis therapy.

Authors:  Stefania S Grigoriou; Argyro A Krase; Christina Karatzaferi; Christoforos D Giannaki; Eleftherios Lavdas; Georgia I Mitrou; Saul Bloxham; Ioannis Stefanidis; Giorgos K Sakkas
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Hydration measurement by bioimpedance spectroscopy and blood pressure management in children on hemodialysis.

Authors:  Ariane Zaloszyc; Betti Schaefer; Franz Schaefer; Saoussen Krid; Rémi Salomon; Patrick Niaudet; Claus Peter Schmitt; Michel Fischbach
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  Patient-stated preferences regarding volume-related risk mitigation strategies for hemodialysis.

Authors:  Jennifer E Flythe; Thomas W Mangione; Steven M Brunelli; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Associations of Posthemodialysis Weights above and below Target Weight with All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality.

Authors:  Jennifer E Flythe; Abhijit V Kshirsagar; Ronald J Falk; Steven M Brunelli
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  Efficacy of dialysis in peritoneal dialysis: utility of bioimpedance to calculate Kt/V and the search for a target Kt.

Authors:  G Martínez Fernández; A Ortega Cerrato; J Masiá Mondéjar; A Pérez Rodríguez; F Llamas Fuentes; C Gómez Roldán; Juan Pérez-Martínez
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 2.801

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.