Jennifer E Flythe1, Abhijit V Kshirsagar2, Ronald J Falk2, Steven M Brunelli3. 1. University of North Carolina Kidney Center, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and jflythe@med.unc.edu. 2. University of North Carolina Kidney Center, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 3. Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and DaVita Clinical Research, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fluid removal via ultrafiltration is a primary function of hemodialysis, and inadequate volume control is associated with significant morbidity and mortality among chronic dialysis patients. Treatment-to-treatment fluid removal goals are typically calculated on the basis of interdialytic weight gain and prescribed target weight. The clinical effect of frequent missed target weights is unclear. This study was designed to evaluate the associations of postdialysis weights above and below the prescribed target weight (separately) and outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Data were taken from a national cohort of 10,785 prevalent, thrice-weekly, in-center hemodialysis patients dialyzing from 2005 to 2008 (median time at risk, 2.1 [25th percentile, 75th percentile] years) at a single dialysis organization. Patients were characterized as having an above target weight miss if their postdialysis weight was >2 kg above target weight in at least 30% of baseline treatments (14.6% of cohort), or they were characterized as control otherwise. Below target weight miss characterization was analogous for patients with postdialysis weight >2 kg below target weight (6.6% of cohort). Coprimary endpoints were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. RESULTS: Above target weight miss in at least 30% of treatments (versus not) was associated with greater all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.15 to 1.43); and below target weight miss in at least 30% of treatments (versus not) was associated with greater all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.05 to 1.40). Both above and below target weight misses were also significantly associated with greater cardiovascular mortality. Secondary analyses demonstrated dose-response relationships between target weight misses and mortality. Results from sensitivity analyses considering the difference in postdialysis and target weights as a proportion of body weight were analogous to the primary results. CONCLUSIONS: Postdialysis weights >2 kg above and below target weight are associated with higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Consistent target weight achievement is a viable target for improving fluid management.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fluid removal via ultrafiltration is a primary function of hemodialysis, and inadequate volume control is associated with significant morbidity and mortality among chronic dialysis patients. Treatment-to-treatment fluid removal goals are typically calculated on the basis of interdialytic weight gain and prescribed target weight. The clinical effect of frequent missed target weights is unclear. This study was designed to evaluate the associations of postdialysis weights above and below the prescribed target weight (separately) and outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Data were taken from a national cohort of 10,785 prevalent, thrice-weekly, in-center hemodialysis patients dialyzing from 2005 to 2008 (median time at risk, 2.1 [25th percentile, 75th percentile] years) at a single dialysis organization. Patients were characterized as having an above target weight miss if their postdialysis weight was >2 kg above target weight in at least 30% of baseline treatments (14.6% of cohort), or they were characterized as control otherwise. Below target weight miss characterization was analogous for patients with postdialysis weight >2 kg below target weight (6.6% of cohort). Coprimary endpoints were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. RESULTS: Above target weight miss in at least 30% of treatments (versus not) was associated with greater all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.15 to 1.43); and below target weight miss in at least 30% of treatments (versus not) was associated with greater all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.05 to 1.40). Both above and below target weight misses were also significantly associated with greater cardiovascular mortality. Secondary analyses demonstrated dose-response relationships between target weight misses and mortality. Results from sensitivity analyses considering the difference in postdialysis and target weights as a proportion of body weight were analogous to the primary results. CONCLUSIONS: Postdialysis weights >2 kg above and below target weight are associated with higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Consistent target weight achievement is a viable target for improving fluid management.
Authors: Tara I Chang; Jane Paik; Tom Greene; Manisha Desai; Fritz Bech; Alfred K Cheung; Glenn M Chertow Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: James O Burton; Helen J Jefferies; Nicholas M Selby; Christopher W McIntyre Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2009-04-08 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Julie R McMullen; Megan C Sherwood; Oleg Tarnavski; Li Zhang; Adam L Dorfman; Tetsuo Shioi; Seigo Izumo Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-06-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Gad Cotter; G Michael Felker; Kirkwood F Adams; Olga Milo-Cotter; Christopher M O'Connor Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Jeffrey Perl; Laura M Dember; Joanne M Bargman; Teri Browne; David M Charytan; Jennifer E Flythe; LaTonya J Hickson; Adriana M Hung; Michel Jadoul; Timmy Chang Lee; Klemens B Meyer; Hamid Moradi; Tariq Shafi; Isaac Teitelbaum; Leslie P Wong; Christopher T Chan Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Damien Ashby; Natalie Borman; James Burton; Richard Corbett; Andrew Davenport; Ken Farrington; Katey Flowers; James Fotheringham; R N Andrea Fox; Gail Franklin; Claire Gardiner; R N Martin Gerrish; Sharlene Greenwood; Daljit Hothi; Abdul Khares; Pelagia Koufaki; Jeremy Levy; Elizabeth Lindley; Jamie Macdonald; Bruno Mafrici; Andrew Mooney; James Tattersall; Kay Tyerman; Enric Villar; Martin Wilkie Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Magdalene M Assimon; Thuy Nguyen; Suzanne L Katsanos; Steven M Brunelli; Jennifer E Flythe Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2016-11-11 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Melissa C Caughey; Randal K Detwiler; Joseph A Sivak; Lisa J Rose-Jones; Abhijit V Kshirsagar; Alan L Hinderliter Journal: Transplantation Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 5.385