Literature DB >> 22886499

Efficacy of dialysis in peritoneal dialysis: utility of bioimpedance to calculate Kt/V and the search for a target Kt.

G Martínez Fernández1, A Ortega Cerrato, J Masiá Mondéjar, A Pérez Rodríguez, F Llamas Fuentes, C Gómez Roldán, Juan Pérez-Martínez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To calculate Kt/V, volume (V) is usually obtained by Watson formula, but bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is a simple and applicable technique to determinate V, along with other hydration and nutrition parameters, in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Dialysis efficacy can also be measured with Kt, but no experience exists in PD, so there is no reference/target value for Kt that must be achieved in these patients to be considered adequately dialyzed. We evaluated the efficacy of PD with Kt/V using Watson formula and BIS for V calculation, assessed hydration status in a PD unit by data obtained by BIS, and attempted to find a reference Kt from the Kt/V previously obtained by BIS.
METHODS: In this observational prospective study of 78 PD patients, we measured V using BIS (V bis) and Watson formula (V w) and calculated weekly Kt/V using both volumes (Kt/V bis/V bis and Kt/V w). With the BIS technique, we obtained and subsequently analyzed other hydration status parameters. We achieved a reference Kt, extrapolating the value desired (weekly Kt/V 1.7) to the target Kt using the simple linear regression statistical technique, basing it on the results of the previously calculated Pearson's linear correlation coefficient.
RESULTS: Volume was 1.8 l higher by Watson formula than with BIS (p < 0.001). Weekly Kt/V bis was 2.33 ± 0.68, and mean weekly Kt/V w was 2.20 ± 0.63 (p < 0.0001); 60.25 % of patients presented overhydration according to the BIS study (OH >1.1 l). The target value of Kt for the reference weekly Kt/V bis (1.7) was 64.87 l.
CONCLUSIONS: BIS is a simple, applicable technique for calculating V in dialysis that can be especially useful in PD patients compared with the anthropometric formulas, by the abnormally distributed body water in these patients. Other parameters obtained by BIS will serve to assess both the distribution of body volume and nutritional status in the clinical setting. The target Kt value obtained from Kt/V bis allowed us to measure the efficacy of PD in a practical way, omitting V measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22886499     DOI: 10.1007/s10157-012-0671-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol        ISSN: 1342-1751            Impact factor:   2.801


  32 in total

1.  Relations between malnutrition-inflammation-atherosclerosis and volume status. The usefulness of bioimpedance analysis in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Meltem Sezis Demirci; Cenk Demirci; Oner Ozdogan; Fatih Kircelli; Fehmi Akcicek; Ali Basci; Ercan Ok; Mehmet Ozkahya
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.992

2.  Strong association between volume status and nutritional status in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Li-Tao Cheng; Wen Tang; Tao Wang
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  Bioimpedance-based identification of malnutrition using fuzzy logic.

Authors:  S Wieskotten; S Heinke; P Wabel; U Moissl; J Becker; M Pirlich; M Keymling; R Isermann
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 2.833

4.  Relationship between total body water and surface area in normal and obese subjects.

Authors:  R Hume; E Weyers
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Total body water volumes for adult males and females estimated from simple anthropometric measurements.

Authors:  P E Watson; I D Watson; R D Batt
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  [Guidelines of the Spanish Society of Nephrology. Clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis].

Authors:  J Arrieta; M A Bajo; F Caravaca; F Coronel; H García-Pérez; E González-Parra; A Granado; J Martín-Govantes; A Miguel; A Molina; J Montenegro; V Pérez-Bañasco; M Pérez-Fontán; C Remón-Rodríguez; J R Rodríguez-Palomares; C Ruiz; A Sánchez-Moreno; N Vega
Journal:  Nefrologia       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.033

7.  [Estimate of the dialysis dose using ionic dialysance].

Authors:  J L Teruel; M Fernández Lucas; R Marcén; J R Rodríguez; M Rivera; F Liaño; J Ortuño
Journal:  Nefrologia       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.033

8.  [Kt as control and follow-up of the dose at a hemodialysis unit].

Authors:  F Maduell; M Vera; N Serra; S Collado; M Carrera; A Fernández; M Arias; M Blasco; E Burgadá; A Cases; J Maria Campistol
Journal:  Nefrologia       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.033

9.  Bioelectric impedance vector distribution in peritoneal dialysis patients with different hydration status.

Authors:  Antonio Piccoli
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  Cardiovascular remodelling and extracellular fluid excess in early stages of chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Marie Essig; Brigitte Escoubet; Dominique de Zuttere; Françoise Blanchet; Florence Arnoult; Emmanuel Dupuis; Catherine Michel; Françoise Mignon; France Mentre; Christine Clerici; François Vrtovsnik
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 5.992

View more
  2 in total

1.  Peritoneal dialysis in older adults: Evaluation of clinical, nutritional, metabolic outcomes, and quality of life.

Authors:  Silvia Lai; Maria I Amabile; Matteo B Bargagli; T Gnerre Musto; Andrea Martinez; Massimo Testorio; Daniela Mastroluca; Carlo Lai; Paola Aceto; Alessio Molfino
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Comparison between different methods of calculating Kt/V as the marker of adequacy of dialysis.

Authors:  Sajad Ahmad; Irfan Elahi; Muhammad Anees
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.