OBJECTIVES: Incidental extra-mammary findings in breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) may be benign in nature, but may also represent a metastasis or another important lesion. We aimed to analyse the prevalence and clinical relevance of these unexpected findings. METHODS: A retrospective review of 1535 breast MRIs was conducted. Only axial sequences were reassessed. Confirmation examinations were obtained in all cases. RESULTS: 285 patients had a confirmed incidental finding, which were located in the liver (51.9%), lung (11.2%), bone (7%), mediastinal lymph nodes (4.2%) or consisted of pleural/pericardial effusion (15.4%). 20.4% of incidental findings were confirmed to be malignant. Positive predictive value for MRI to detect a metastatic lesion was high if located within the bone (89%), lymph nodes (83%) and lung (59%), while it was low if located within the liver (9%) or if it consisted of pleural/pericardial effusion (6%). The axial enhanced sequence showed superior sensitivity to unenhanced images in detecting metastatic lesions, especially if only smaller (≤10 mm.) lesions were considered. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of metastatic incidental extra-mammary findings is not negligible. Particular attention should be to incidental findings located within the lung, bone and mediastinal lymph nodes.
OBJECTIVES: Incidental extra-mammary findings in breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) may be benign in nature, but may also represent a metastasis or another important lesion. We aimed to analyse the prevalence and clinical relevance of these unexpected findings. METHODS: A retrospective review of 1535 breast MRIs was conducted. Only axial sequences were reassessed. Confirmation examinations were obtained in all cases. RESULTS: 285 patients had a confirmed incidental finding, which were located in the liver (51.9%), lung (11.2%), bone (7%), mediastinal lymph nodes (4.2%) or consisted of pleural/pericardial effusion (15.4%). 20.4% of incidental findings were confirmed to be malignant. Positive predictive value for MRI to detect a metastatic lesion was high if located within the bone (89%), lymph nodes (83%) and lung (59%), while it was low if located within the liver (9%) or if it consisted of pleural/pericardial effusion (6%). The axial enhanced sequence showed superior sensitivity to unenhanced images in detecting metastatic lesions, especially if only smaller (≤10 mm.) lesions were considered. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of metastatic incidental extra-mammary findings is not negligible. Particular attention should be to incidental findings located within the lung, bone and mediastinal lymph nodes.
Authors: Hania A Al-Hallaq; Loren K Mell; Julie A Bradley; Lucy F Chen; Arif N Ali; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Gillian M Newstead; Steven J Chmura Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-11-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: E vanSonnenberg; J T Wroblicka; H B D'Agostino; J R Mathieson; G Casola; R O'Laoide; P L Cooperberg Journal: Radiology Date: 1994-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Meagan Elizabeth Brennan; Nehmat Houssami; Sarah Lord; Petra Macaskill; Les Irwig; J Michael Dixon; Ruth M L Warren; Stefano Ciatto Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-10-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Katrin Hegenscheid; Pia Erdmann; Thomas Kohlmann; Martin Langanke; Henry Völzke; Ralf Puls; Heinrich Assel; Reiner Biffar; Hans Jörgen Grabe Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jill Gluskin; Sarah Eliades; Aradhna Raj; Varadan Sevilimedu; Richard Kinh Gian Do Journal: Clin Imaging Date: 2022-02-16 Impact factor: 2.420
Authors: Sneha Phadke; Alexandra Thomas; Limin Yang; Catherine Moore; Chang Xia; Mary C Schroeder Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Pamela J DiPiro; David P Alper; Catherine S Giess; Daniel I Glazer; Leslie K Lee; Ronilda Lacson; Ramin Khorasani Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2020-01-28 Impact factor: 5.532