Literature DB >> 23616634

Multiple bilateral circumscribed masses at screening breast US: consider annual follow-up.

Wendie A Berg1, Zheng Zhang, Jean B Cormack, Ellen B Mendelson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine prospectively the prevalence and rate of malignancy of multiple bilateral (MB) circumscribed breast masses detected at screening ultrasonography (US) compared with those of other US-depicted masses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant prospective trial included women at elevated risk for breast cancer, who gave written informed consent to participate in a study evaluating cancer detection rates for three rounds of annual supplemental screening US at 21 international sites. After exclusions, 2662 participants and 7473 screening studies were included. Physician-performed US studies were interpreted, with blinding to mammography results. Simple cysts were noted. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System features of all other findings were recorded, with addition of the descriptor MB similar-appearing circumscribed masses (minimum of three total and at least one in each breast), with details of the largest such mass recorded. Rates of malignancy were determined after biopsy or mammographic and US follow-up at a minimum of 11 months. For this analysis, 490 women (1370 screenings) with prior mastectomy were excluded. Descriptive statistics and exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated.
RESULTS: Of 2172 evaluable participants (6103 screening studies; median age at study entry, 54.0 years; range, 25-91 years), 1454 had unique findings at US. One hundred thirty-five (6.2%) participants had 153 unique MB circumscribed masses, with no malignancies (0% [95% CI: 0%, 2.4%]; 95% CI: 0%, 2.9% for the 127 masses with at least 2 years of follow-up). There were 1319 (60.7%) participants with 2464 non-MB lesions, including 1038 solitary circumscribed masses with a malignancy rate of 0.8% (eight of 1038). Of 836 solitary circumscribed masses with at least 2 years of follow-up, the malignancy rate was 0.4% (three of 836; 95% CI: 0.1%, 1.0%). Of the 135 women with MB circumscribed masses, 82 (60.7%) also had a solitary lesion. Two of these 82 women (2.4%) had cancer.
CONCLUSION: MB similar-appearing circumscribed masses seen at screening US are almost always benign, with no malignancies found among such lesions in this prospective, multicenter experience. These lesions are suitable for diagnostic follow-up in 1 year, with resumption of screening thereafter if they are stable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23616634      PMCID: PMC3750421          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13122251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  31 in total

1.  Cystic lesions of the breast: sonographic-pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Cristina I Campassi; Olga B Ioffe
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography.

Authors:  I Vizcaíno; L Gadea; L Andreo; D Salas; F Ruiz-Perales; D Cuevas; C Herranz; F Bueno
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Management of complex breast cysts.

Authors:  L A Venta; J P Kim; C E Pelloski; M Morrow
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Autosomal dominant inheritance of early-onset breast cancer. Implications for risk prediction.

Authors:  E B Claus; N Risch; W D Thompson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Solid breast masses diagnosed as fibroadenoma at fine-needle aspiration biopsy: acceptable rates of growth at long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Paula B Gordon; Faith A Gagnon; Leora Lanzkowsky
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Probably benign lesions at screening breast US in a population with elevated risk: prevalence and rate of malignancy in the ACRIN 6666 trial.

Authors:  Richard G Barr; Zheng Zhang; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Fibroadenoma of the female breast: a critical clinical assessment.

Authors:  C H Organ; B C Organ
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 1.798

9.  Nonpalpable, circumscribed, noncalcified solid breast masses: likelihood of malignancy based on lesion size and age of patient.

Authors:  E A Sickles
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions.

Authors:  Ximena Varas; José H Leborgne; Francisco Leborgne; Julieta Mezzera; Sylvia Jaumandreu; Felix Leborgne
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  9 in total

1.  Reducing Unnecessary Biopsy and Follow-up of Benign Cystic Breast Lesions.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Ultrasound as the Primary Screening Test for Breast Cancer: Analysis From ACRIN 6666.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Andriy I Bandos; Ellen B Mendelson; Daniel Lehrer; Roberta A Jong; Etta D Pisano
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  BI-RADS 3 on Screening Breast Ultrasound: What Is It and What Is the Appropriate Management?

Authors:  Wendie A Berg
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2021-08-15

4.  Probably benign lesions at screening breast US in a population with elevated risk: prevalence and rate of malignancy in the ACRIN 6666 trial.

Authors:  Richard G Barr; Zheng Zhang; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Application of the downgrade criteria to supplemental screening ultrasound for women with negative mammography but dense breasts.

Authors:  Soo-Yeon Kim; Min Jung Kim; Hee Jung Moon; Jung Hyun Yoon; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 6.  Automated Breast Ultrasound Screening for Dense Breasts.

Authors:  Sung Hun Kim; Hak Hee Kim; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Features of breast cancer initially assessed as probably benign on ultrasound: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Hye Ji Ryu; Joo Hee Cha; Hak Hee Kim; Hee Jung Shin; Eun Young Chae; Woo Jung Choi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 8.  BI-RADS 3: Current and Future Use of Probably Benign.

Authors:  Karen A Lee; Nishi Talati; Rebecca Oudsema; Sharon Steinberger; Laurie R Margolies
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2018-01-27

9.  Follow-Up Intervals for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 Lesions on Screening Ultrasound in Screening and Tertiary Referral Centers.

Authors:  Sun Huh; Hee Jung Suh; Eun Kyung Kim; Min Jung Kim; Jung Hyun Yoon; Vivian Youngjean Park; Hee Jung Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.500

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.