Literature DB >> 19800259

Management of proximal humeral fractures: surgeons don't agree.

Charles J Petit1, Peter J Millett, Nathan K Endres, David Diller, Mitchel B Harris, Jon J P Warner.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: The management options for proximal humeral fractures have expanded in recent years. Patients with displaced, unstable proximal humeral fractures may have improved outcomes if managed operatively. We investigated the decision making of fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons when presented with the same group of cases. We hypothesized that interobserver and intraobserver agreement for surgical management would be poor and independent of fellowship training.
METHOD: Eight fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons (3 shoulder, 5 trauma) viewed the preoperative plain radiographs of patients with proximal humeral fractures. All surgeons viewed the same 38 radiographs in a blinded fashion. Surgeons chose from 1 of 6 management options. Interobserver variability was calculated by using the weighted kappa coefficient. Intraobserver variability was calculated by comparing each surgeon's survey results with the operation they originally performed.
RESULTS: Overall interobserver agreement on management was moderate (weighted kappa=0.41) and did not differ significantly between trauma surgeons and shoulder surgeons. Reducing the number of management choices increased agreement between all surgeons. Testing for intraobserver agreement showed that surgeons picked the same operation in the survey as in the actual clinical setting only 56% of the time.
CONCLUSION: Interobserver agreement was moderate overall and improved when the number of management choices was reduced. Intraobserver agreement was less frequent, however, raising the question about consistent decision making by a given surgeon. Although surgeons agree in the method of treatment only to a modest degree, it remains for further outcomes research to establish if the choice of treatment actually influences the clinical outcome. 2010 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19800259     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  11 in total

Review 1.  Surgical versus conservative treatment for displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Fu; Chengyan Xia; Zonghuan Li; Hua Wu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

2.  3D reconstruction does not improve agreement and results in an increase in surgical indications in proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Carlos Torrens; Raquel Marí; Marta Cuenca; Tulia Ferrer; Klaus Langohr; Fernando Santana
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-09-06

3.  Surgeon volume is associated with cost and variation in surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Nitin B Jain; Ifedayo Kuye; Laurence D Higgins; Jon J P Warner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Long contoured locking plate fixation of traumatic proximal humeral fractures with distal extension.

Authors:  Joby J George Malal; Alistair I W Mayne; Faten Arouri; Ali M Noorani; Matthew Kent; Matt Smith; Inigo Guisasola; Peter Brownson
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2014-07-04

5.  Decision making in displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: fracture or surgeon based?

Authors:  Gertraud Gradl; Matthias Knobe; Hans-Christoph Pape; Paul Valentin Neuhaus; David Ring; Thierry Guitton
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Substantial variation among hernia experts in the decision for treatment of patients with incisional hernia: a descriptive study on agreement.

Authors:  D Kokotovic; I Gögenur; F Helgstrand
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Incidence and outcomes of humeral fractures in the older person.

Authors:  M Q Wang; T Youssef; P Smerdely
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Comparison of surgical and non-surgical treatments for 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sebastian Orman; Amin Mohamadi; Joseph Serino; Jordan Murphy; Philip Hanna; Michael J Weaver; George Dyer; Ara Nazarian; Arvind von Keudell
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-02-28

9.  Surgeons agree more on treatment recommendations than on classification of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Stig Brorson; Bo Sanderhoff Olsen; Lars Henrik Frich; Steen Lund Jensen; Anne Kathrine Sørensen; Michael Krogsgaard; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Classification and treatment of proximal humerus fractures: inter-observer reliability and agreement across imaging modalities and experience.

Authors:  Abtin Foroohar; Rick Tosti; John M Richmond; John P Gaughan; Asif M Ilyas
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.