Literature DB >> 25663957

Surgical versus conservative treatment for displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis.

Tao Fu1, Chengyan Xia1, Zonghuan Li2, Hua Wu1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Treatment strategies for complex displaced proximal humeral fractures (DPHF) in elderly patients remain controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the benefits and risks of surgical or conservative methods for these patients.
METHODS: Pubmed, Cochrane library and EMBASE were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from their establishment to June 2013. Researches on surgical/conservative treatment for complex displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients were selected. Methodological quality of included studies was evaluated by the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. Outcome measurements were Constant score, DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand), postoperative complications and quality of life (QoL). The meta-analysis was performed with software Stata 12.0.
RESULTS: Six RCTs with 272 patients were included and analyzed. Fix studies with a PEDro score of 6 or more were of high quality. The differences in QoL (WMD 0.43, 95% CI (0.12, 0.74)) and postoperative complications (RR 2.06, 95% CI (1.45, 2.93)) were statistically significant between operative and conservative treatment. There was no statistically significant difference in Constant score (WMD 0.06, 95% CI (-0.20, 0.31)) and DASH (WMD 0.33, 95% CI (-0.70, 0.04)).
CONCLUSION: Despite the small improvement of QoL, surgical treatments did not significantly improve the functional outcome including Constant score and DASH. Instead, surgical treatment for displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients led to higher incidence of postoperative complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Surgical procedures; conservative; elderly; meta-analysis; proximal humeral fracture

Year:  2014        PMID: 25663957      PMCID: PMC4307404     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  23 in total

1.  [Complication analysis of proximal humeral fractures treated with locking plate].

Authors:  Zhong-guo Fu; Lei Deng; Lu Bai; Jian-hai Chen; Pei-xun Zhang; Yu Dang; Dian-ying Zhang; Bao-guo Jiang
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2011-10-18

2.  Measuring levels of upper-extremity disability in employed adults using the DASH Questionnaire.

Authors:  Andrea Jester; Angela Harth; Guenter Germann
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.230

3.  The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study.

Authors:  Natalie A de Morton
Journal:  Aust J Physiother       Date:  2009

4.  Treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  K Zyto; L Ahrengart; A Sperber; H Törnkvist
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-05

5.  Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement.

Authors:  C S Neer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Hemiarthroplasty for humeral four-part fractures for patients 65 years and older: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Harm W Boons; Jon H Goosen; Susan van Grinsven; Job L van Susante; Corné J van Loon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  C M Court-Brown; A Garg; M M McQueen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2001-08

8.  Surgical treatment of three and four-part proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Brian D Solberg; Charles N Moon; Dennis P Franco; Guy D Paiement
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA Types 11) treated with locked plates.

Authors:  Kenneth A Egol; Crispin C Ong; Michael Walsh; Laith M Jazrawi; Nirmal C Tejwani; Joseph D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  Management of proximal humeral fractures: surgeons don't agree.

Authors:  Charles J Petit; Peter J Millett; Nathan K Endres; David Diller; Mitchel B Harris; Jon J P Warner
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  4 in total

1.  The influence of fracture severity on postoperative outcome and quality of life after locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Simon Thelen; Jan P Grassmann; Madeleine Schneider; Carina Jaekel; Dana M Meier; Marcel Betsch; Mohssen Hakimi; Michael Wild
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2022-05-23

2.  Non-operative treatment of four-part fractures of the proximal end of the humerus: results of a prospective and retrospective multicentric study.

Authors:  Romain Bouchet; Damien Block; Thomas D'ollonne; François Gadea; Julia Gaillot; François Sirveaux; Dominique Saragaglia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Operative versus non-operative treatment in complex proximal humeral fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Lin Xie; Fan Ding; Zhigang Zhao; Yan Chen; Danmou Xing
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-11-25

4.  Readmissions, revisions, and mortality after treatment for proximal humeral fractures in three large states.

Authors:  Dominique I Dabija; Hongshu Guan; Andrew Neviaser; Nitin B Jain
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.