Elliott K Main1. 1. California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco and California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Palo Alto, California 94118, USA. maine@sutterhealth.org
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hospital quality measures have matured in many specialties but have lagged behind in maternity care. Recently, the National Quality Forum (NQF) has endorsed a series of 17 quality measures for perinatal care. It is important for all obstetric practitioners and leaders to understand these measures, as they form the basis of judging the quality of our hospital services for the next decade. RECENT FINDINGS: Measure characteristics are examined including how they are developed and judged, and then the nine obstetric care measures are discussed in detail, including their literature support and specifications. The challenges of designing and testing new measures are explored. The importance of this measure set is stressed, as both the Joint Commission and the Leapfrog Group have chosen their next set of perinatal measures from this group as will state and regional public reporting organizations. Hospital quality improvement activities will be increasingly focused on improving performance on these measures. SUMMARY: The current NQF measure set is not perfect but represents a reasonable start, covering a range of obstetric practice. Many of the measures could use further refinement and we need research and testing of additional measures going forward.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hospital quality measures have matured in many specialties but have lagged behind in maternity care. Recently, the National Quality Forum (NQF) has endorsed a series of 17 quality measures for perinatal care. It is important for all obstetric practitioners and leaders to understand these measures, as they form the basis of judging the quality of our hospital services for the next decade. RECENT FINDINGS: Measure characteristics are examined including how they are developed and judged, and then the nine obstetric care measures are discussed in detail, including their literature support and specifications. The challenges of designing and testing new measures are explored. The importance of this measure set is stressed, as both the Joint Commission and the Leapfrog Group have chosen their next set of perinatal measures from this group as will state and regional public reporting organizations. Hospital quality improvement activities will be increasingly focused on improving performance on these measures. SUMMARY: The current NQF measure set is not perfect but represents a reasonable start, covering a range of obstetric practice. Many of the measures could use further refinement and we need research and testing of additional measures going forward.
Authors: Naomi S Bardach; Eric Vittinghoff; Renée Asteria-Peñaloza; Jeffrey D Edwards; Jinoos Yazdany; Henry C Lee; W John Boscardin; Michael D Cabana; R Adams Dudley Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-08-26 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Lisa M Goldthwaite; Lindsey Duca; Randi K Johnson; Danielle Ostendorf; Jeanelle Sheeder Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Teresa Janevic; Natalia N Egorova; Jennifer Zeitlin; Amy Balbierz; Paul L Hebert; Elizabeth A Howell Journal: Med Care Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Jochen Profit; Jeffrey B Gould; David Draper; John A F Zupancic; Marc A Kowalkowski; LeChauncy Woodard; Kenneth Pietz; Laura A Petersen Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2012-07-31 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Ipek Gurol-Urganci; David A Cromwell; Leroy C Edozien; Chidimma Onwere; Tahir A Mahmood; Jan H van der Meulen Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2011-06-08 Impact factor: 3.007