Literature DB >> 19794222

Failure of fracture plate fixation.

Michael J Gardner1, Jason M Evans, Robert P Dunbar.   

Abstract

Failure of fracture fixation after plating often leads to challenging surgical revision situations. Careful analysis of all patient and fracture variables is helpful in both determining the causes of the fixation failure and maximizing the success of subsequent interventions. Biologic and mechanical factors must be considered. Biologic considerations include traumatic soft-tissue injury and atrophic fracture site. Common mechanical reasons for failure include malreduction, inadequate plate length or strength, and excessive or insufficient construct stiffness. Reliance on laterally based implants in the presence of medial comminution may be a cause of fixation failure and subsequent deformity, particularly with conventional nonlocking implants. Management of dead space with cement or beads has been effective in conjunction with staged approaches. An antibiotic cement rod in the diaphysis may provide fracture stabilization. Locking full-length constructs should be considered for osteoporotic fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19794222     DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200910000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  14 in total

1.  Fibula-pro-tibia in plating tibial non-unions.

Authors:  Galal Z Said; Mohammad M El-Sharkawi; Hatem G Said; Omar A Refai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Repeat LISS treatment for femoral shaft fractures due to hardware failure: a retrospective analysis of eleven cases.

Authors:  Xu Li; Xian Xu; Lin Liu; Qin Shao; Wei Wu
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-09-22

3.  Finite Element-Derived Surrogate Models of Locked Plate Fracture Fixation Biomechanics.

Authors:  Hwabok Wee; J Spence Reid; Vernon M Chinchilli; Gregory S Lewis
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Endosteal strut augment reduces complications associated with proximal humeral locking plates.

Authors:  Andrew S Neviaser; Carolyn M Hettrich; Brandon S Beamer; Joshua S Dines; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Numerical investigation of fracture impaction in proximal humeral fracture fixation with locking plate and intramedullary nail.

Authors:  Yen-Nien Chen; Chih-Wei Chang; Chia-Wei Lin; Chih-Wei Wang; Yao-Te Peng; Chih-Han Chang; Chun-Ting Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Evidence for success with locking plates for fragility fractures.

Authors:  Charles N Cornell; Omri Ayalon
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-02-01

7.  Optimizing Hybrid Plate Fixation with a Locked, Oblique End Screw in Osteoporotic Fractures.

Authors:  Aaron Wynkoop; Osy Ndubaku; Paul M Charpentier; Jeffrey B Peck; Norman E Walter; Patrick Atkinson
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017

8.  Mechanical behaviour of low-cost dynamic compression plates correlates with manufacturing quality standards.

Authors:  Edward Aluede; Erik McDonald; Harry Jergesen; Thomas Penoyar; Kayla Calvert
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  A Unique Mode of Failure in the Noncontact Bridging Periprosthetic Plating System.

Authors:  Erin Stockwell; Matthew A Mormino; Justin C Siebler
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2021-02-02

10.  Use of screw locking elements improves radiological and biomechanical results of femoral osteotomies.

Authors:  Gerardo L Garcés; Oliver Rodríguez; Enrique Rodríguez Grau-Bassas; Syra Roiz; Alejandro Yánez; Alberto Cuadrado
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.