BACKGROUND: The end screw in a fracture plate creates the greatest resistance to bending. For osteoporotic fractures treated with plates, there is some question as to the optimal screw insertion technique for the screw farthest from the fracture. A locked, oblique end screw was previously shown to increase resistance to periprosthetic fracture. It is unknown, however, how this end screw configuration would resist pullout when subjected to bending. METHODS: Narrow, low contact 3.5 mm locking compression plates with 6 and 12 holes were anchored to simulated bone material with material properties representing osteoporotic bone. Four configurations were evaluated for the end screw: perpendicular and angulated 30 degrees away from the fracture for both non-locked and locked screws (n=6 per group). The constructs were subjected to 3 point bending until the peak load and finally total construct failure was achieved. RESULTS: Peak force, stiffness, energy to peak load, and the failure mode of each construct were determined. All four 12-hole construct groups failed by gross plastic bending deformation of the plate at the fulcrum past a previously established clinically relevant limit for failure (15°). All 12-hole plate constructs failed at statistically higher loads and energy than any of the 6-hole plate constructs, with the exception of the 6-hole locked, oblique construct. CONCLUSION: The locked, oblique end screw provides equivalent pull out strength for 3.5 mm low contact plates regardless of plate length. Combined with its resistance to periprosthetic fracture, this end screw configuration appears to be the best option for the construct integrity of hybrid plating for osteoporotic fractures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Osteoporotic fractures are challenging to treat. The current study and the existing literature show that resistance to both bending loads and refracture at the end of a plate are minimized with a locked screw angled away from the fracture.
BACKGROUND: The end screw in a fracture plate creates the greatest resistance to bending. For osteoporotic fractures treated with plates, there is some question as to the optimal screw insertion technique for the screw farthest from the fracture. A locked, oblique end screw was previously shown to increase resistance to periprosthetic fracture. It is unknown, however, how this end screw configuration would resist pullout when subjected to bending. METHODS: Narrow, low contact 3.5 mm locking compression plates with 6 and 12 holes were anchored to simulated bone material with material properties representing osteoporotic bone. Four configurations were evaluated for the end screw: perpendicular and angulated 30 degrees away from the fracture for both non-locked and locked screws (n=6 per group). The constructs were subjected to 3 point bending until the peak load and finally total construct failure was achieved. RESULTS: Peak force, stiffness, energy to peak load, and the failure mode of each construct were determined. All four 12-hole construct groups failed by gross plastic bending deformation of the plate at the fulcrum past a previously established clinically relevant limit for failure (15°). All 12-hole plate constructs failed at statistically higher loads and energy than any of the 6-hole plate constructs, with the exception of the 6-hole locked, oblique construct. CONCLUSION: The locked, oblique end screw provides equivalent pull out strength for 3.5 mm low contact plates regardless of plate length. Combined with its resistance to periprosthetic fracture, this end screw configuration appears to be the best option for the construct integrity of hybrid plating for osteoporotic fractures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Osteoporotic fractures are challenging to treat. The current study and the existing literature show that resistance to both bending loads and refracture at the end of a plate are minimized with a locked screw angled away from the fracture.
Authors: Andrew L Freeman; Paul Tornetta; Andrew Schmidt; Joan Bechtold; William Ricci; Mark Fleming Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Jason T Bariteau; Amanda Fantry; Brad Blankenhorn; Craig Lareau; David Paller; Christopher W Digiovanni Journal: Foot Ankle Surg Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 2.705
Authors: Jeffrey B Peck; Paul M Charpentier; Brian P Flanagan; Ajay K Srivastava; Patrick J Atkinson Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Kenneth A Egol; Erik N Kubiak; Eric Fulkerson; Frederick J Kummer; Kenneth J Koval Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Chris Estes; Peter Rhee; M Wade Shrader; Kristine Csavina; Marc C Jacofsky; David J Jacofsky Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2008 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Michael Bottlang; Josef Doornink; Gregory D Byrd; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; Steven M Madey Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2009-03-01 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Shiling Zhang; Dharmesh Patel; Mark Brady; Sherri Gambill; Kanthan Theivendran; Subodh Deshmukh; John Swadener; Sarah Junaid; Laura Jane Leslie Journal: Proc Inst Mech Eng H Date: 2022-08-03 Impact factor: 1.763