BACKGROUND: The optimal combination of diet and exercise that produces the greatest reversal of obesity-related insulin resistance is unknown. OBJECTIVES: We examined the effects of a combined 7-d low-glycemic index (low-GI) diet and exercise training intervention on insulin sensitivity in older obese humans. DESIGN:Participants [n = 32; mean (+/-SEM) age: 66 +/- 1 y; body mass index (in kg/m(2)): 33.8 +/- 0.7] were randomly assigned to a parallel, double-blind, controlled-feeding trial and underwent supervised aerobic exercise (EX; 60 min/d at 80-85% maximum heart rate) in combination with either a low-GI (LoGI + EX: 41.1 +/- 0.4) or a high-GI (HiGI + EX: 80.9 +/- 0.6) diet. All meals were provided and were isocaloric to individual energy requirements. Insulin sensitivity and hepatic glucose production were assessed with a 40-mU x m(-2) x min(-1) hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp combined with a [6,6-(2)H(2)]-glucose infusion. RESULTS: After the intervention, small decreases were observed in body weight (-1.6 +/- 0.2 kg; P < 0.0001) and fat mass (-1.7 +/- 0.9%; P = 0.004) in both groups. Maximal aerobic capacity ( O(2)max) also improved slightly (0.06 +/- 0.02 L/min; P = 0.004). Resting systolic blood pressure, fasting glucose, insulin, triglycerides, and cholesterol all decreased after the study (all P < 0.05). Larger changes in systolic blood pressure and O(2max) were seen in the LoGI + EX group. Insulin-stimulated glucose disposal (P < 0.001), insulin suppression of hepatic glucose production (P = 0.004), and postabsorptive fat oxidation (P = 0.03) improved equally in both groups after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the metabolic improvements after short-term exercise training in older obese individuals are dependent on increased physical activity and are not influenced by a low-GI diet. However, a low-GI diet has added benefit in alleviating hypertension, thus reducing the risk of diabetic and vascular complications.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The optimal combination of diet and exercise that produces the greatest reversal of obesity-related insulin resistance is unknown. OBJECTIVES: We examined the effects of a combined 7-d low-glycemic index (low-GI) diet and exercise training intervention on insulin sensitivity in older obesehumans. DESIGN:Participants [n = 32; mean (+/-SEM) age: 66 +/- 1 y; body mass index (in kg/m(2)): 33.8 +/- 0.7] were randomly assigned to a parallel, double-blind, controlled-feeding trial and underwent supervised aerobic exercise (EX; 60 min/d at 80-85% maximum heart rate) in combination with either a low-GI (LoGI + EX: 41.1 +/- 0.4) or a high-GI (HiGI + EX: 80.9 +/- 0.6) diet. All meals were provided and were isocaloric to individual energy requirements. Insulin sensitivity and hepatic glucose production were assessed with a 40-mU x m(-2) x min(-1) hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp combined with a [6,6-(2)H(2)]-glucose infusion. RESULTS: After the intervention, small decreases were observed in body weight (-1.6 +/- 0.2 kg; P < 0.0001) and fat mass (-1.7 +/- 0.9%; P = 0.004) in both groups. Maximal aerobic capacity ( O(2)max) also improved slightly (0.06 +/- 0.02 L/min; P = 0.004). Resting systolic blood pressure, fasting glucose, insulin, triglycerides, and cholesterol all decreased after the study (all P < 0.05). Larger changes in systolic blood pressure and O(2max) were seen in the LoGI + EX group. Insulin-stimulated glucose disposal (P < 0.001), insulin suppression of hepatic glucose production (P = 0.004), and postabsorptive fat oxidation (P = 0.03) improved equally in both groups after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the metabolic improvements after short-term exercise training in older obese individuals are dependent on increased physical activity and are not influenced by a low-GI diet. However, a low-GI diet has added benefit in alleviating hypertension, thus reducing the risk of diabetic and vascular complications.
Authors: Glen E Duncan; Michael G Perri; Douglas W Theriaque; Alan D Hutson; Robert H Eckel; Peter W Stacpoole Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Thomas M S Wolever; Alison L Gibbs; Christine Mehling; Jean-Louis Chiasson; Philip W Connelly; Robert G Josse; Lawrence A Leiter; Pierre Maheux; Remi Rabasa-Lhoret; N Wilson Rodger; Edmond A Ryan Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Christine G Lee; Edward J Boyko; Carrie M Nielson; Marcia L Stefanick; Douglas C Bauer; Andrew R Hoffman; Thuy-Tien L Dam; Jodi A Lapidus; Peggy Mannen Cawthon; Kristine E Ensrud; Eric S Orwoll Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-02-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Karen R Kelly; Sankar D Navaneethan; Thomas P J Solomon; Jacob M Haus; Marc Cook; Hope Barkoukis; John P Kirwan Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2014 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: M L Erickson; J T Mey; C L Axelrod; D Paul; L Gordesky; K Russell; H Barkoukis; P O'Tierney-Ginn; R A Fielding; J P Kirwan; P M Catalano Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-05-08 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Steven K Malin; Nicole Niemi; Thomas P J Solomon; Jacob M Haus; Karen R Kelly; Julianne Filion; Michael Rocco; Sangeeta R Kashyap; Hope Barkoukis; John P Kirwan Journal: Ann Nutr Metab Date: 2012 Impact factor: 3.374
Authors: Jacob M Haus; Thomas P J Solomon; Karen R Kelly; Ciaran E Fealy; Emily L Kullman; Amanda R Scelsi; Lan Lu; Mangesh R Pagadala; Arthur J McCullough; Chris A Flask; John P Kirwan Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-04-24 Impact factor: 5.958