Literature DB >> 16951095

Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique. Surgical technique.

B Sonny Bal1, Doug Haltom, Thomas Aleto, Matthew Barrett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total hip replacement performed through a small incision theoretically results in less trauma to the underlying structures, reduced blood loss, less pain, and a shorter hospital stay, but it may result in increased complications, particularly early in a surgeon's experience with a new technique. In the present study, we reviewed the early results of two techniques involving the use of smaller incisions; specifically, we evaluated one series of primary total hip replacements that had been performed through two small incisions and another series of total hip replacements that had been performed through a single small incision.
METHODS: Eighty-nine consecutive primary total hip replacements were performed with use of the two-incision technique as described by Mears and Berger; all procedures were performed without cement and with use of fluoroscopic guidance. Outcomes data were reviewed at a minimum of six months following the procedure. The results of these procedures were retrospectively compared with those of a historical control series of ninety-six total hip replacements that had been performed by the same surgeon with use of a single miniincision technique. No special attempt was made to discharge any patient early from the hospital. In preparation for the use of the two-incision technique, the surgeon attended a two-day seminar that included cadaveric training and mentoring by surgeons who had experience with this technique.
RESULTS: In the two-incision group, nine patients (nine hips; 10%) required repeat surgery because of a femoral fracture that had been identified postoperatively (two hips), dislocation (one hip), a wound complication (two hips), or subsidence and loosening of the femoral implant (four hips). Twenty-two patients (twenty-two hips; 25%) sustained an injury of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, and one patient (one hip) had a neuropraxia of the femoral nerve. In the comparative series of ninety-six total hip arthroplasties that had been performed with use of a single mini-incision and a direct lateral exposure of the hip joint, the overall complication rate was 6% (six of ninety-six) and the reoperation rate was 3% (three of ninety-six). The rate of complications associated with the two-incision technique decreased significantly as the surgeon gained experience with the procedure (p = 0.0202).
CONCLUSIONS: Although total hip arthroplasty with use of the two-incision technique was performed by a surgeon who was experienced in the performance of total hip replacement surgery with use of a single small incision, the rates of complications and repeat surgery associated with the two-incision technique initially were very high. While the rate diminished with increasing experience, total hip replacement with use of two incisions and fluoroscopic guidance is a technically demanding procedure that may be associated, especially initially, with higher rates of complications and repeat surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16951095     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  12 in total

1.  Is the internal rotation lag sign a sensitive test for detecting hip abductor tendon ruptures after total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Christian Ossendorf; Laurent Bohnert; Nadja Mamisch-Saupe; Daniel Rittirsch; Guido A Wanner; Hans-Peter Simmen; Claudio Dora; Clément Ml Werner
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2011-04-17

2.  Healthcare technology and technology assessment.

Authors:  James H Herndon; Raymond Hwang; K J Bozic; K H Bozic
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  [Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty - trend or state of the art?: A meta-analysis].

Authors:  T Kappe; R Bieger; D Wernerus; H Reichel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  A prospective randomized trial of mini-incision posterior and two-incision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Craig J Della Valle; Emily Dittle; Mario Moric; Scott M Sporer; Asokumar Buvanendran
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  [The standard implantation of a total hip prosthesis via two incisions (the Yale Technique)].

Authors:  Robert Kipping
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.154

6.  Basic science considerations in primary total hip replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  Saqeb B Mirza; Douglas G Dunlop; Sukhmeet S Panesar; Syed G Naqvi; Shafat Gangoo; Saif Salih
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-05-11

7.  Nerve injury in patients after hip and knee arthroplasties and knee arthroscopy.

Authors:  Jennifer N Yacub; J Bradford Rice; Timothy R Dillingham
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.159

8.  [Complications after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  R Hube; M Dienst; P von Roth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  A Comparison of Radiographic Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty Between the Posterior Approach and Direct Anterior Approach With Intraoperative Fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Timothy J Lin; Ilya Bendich; Alex S Ha; Benjamin J Keeney; Wayne E Moschetti; Ivan M Tomek
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty with the anterior approach.

Authors:  B Sonny Bal; Santaram Vallurupalli
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.