Literature DB >> 15062699

Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: the Hospital for Special Surgery experience.

Thomas P Sculco1, Louis C Jordan, William L Walter.   

Abstract

The mini-incision technique is not a radically new technique. The surgeon familiar with the posterior approach will immediately appreciate the inherent similarities. The technique can be developed on a graduated basis by individual surgeons. The surgeon should begin by documenting the length of his or her current routine incision, and then the incision can be progressively reduced in length at a rate that is comfortable. At no time is it necessary to compromise the goals of the procedure because of inadequate visualization. The mini-incision is not for every patient. Obese individuals (BMI> 30), patients with very muscular thighs, stiff hips, or severe deformity may not be candidates for an 8-cm incision, but familiarity with this technique allows even these patients to be operated on through a smaller incision than the traditional 20-25 cm. The initial drive for shorter incisions was a result of patient concerns regarding the cosmesis of the scars and the desire for a more rapid recovery. Subsequent development of the technique and clinical analysis over the last 7 years has shown that THA can be performed safely and effectively through a mini-incision in most patients. So far the author shave found no increased risk for intraoperative or postoperative complications and no problems with component malposition. Longer follow-up is required to determine the long-term outcome; however, in the short term, patients have less blood loss, shorter operative times, and a reduced incidence of limp and cane use at 6 weeks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15062699     DOI: 10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00116-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am        ISSN: 0030-5898            Impact factor:   2.472


  30 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Vicky Blake; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comments on Smith et al.: minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Riaz J K Khan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Comparison of total hip arthroplasty via a posterior mini-incision versus a classic anterolateral approach].

Authors:  M Rittmeister; A Peters
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Modified Hardinge approach with limited incision].

Authors:  M Schneider; I Kawahara; S J Breusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Factors influencing early rehabilitation after THA: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vivek Sharma; Patrick M Morgan; Edward Y Cheng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  T Cheng; J G Feng; T Liu; X L Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  [Minimally invasive posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  B Fink; A Mittelstaedt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 8.  Surgical management of hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Rajiv Gandhi; Anthony V Perruccio; Nizar N Mahomed
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Which is more invasive-mini versus standard incisions in total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  T Shitama; T Kiyama; M Naito; K Shiramizu; G Huang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  [The standard implantation of a total hip prosthesis via two incisions (the Yale Technique)].

Authors:  Robert Kipping
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.