Literature DB >> 19775859

Wear and range of motion of different femoral head sizes.

Eric Mark Hammerberg1, Zhinian Wan, Manish Dastane, Lawrence D Dorr.   

Abstract

Femoral head sizes greater than 32 mm are more prevalent with current total hip arthroplasty. We hypothesized that linear wear rates of Durasul highly cross-linked polyethylene would not differ with different head sizes. We also compared the range of motion of the hip. Ninety-four consecutive arthroplasties in 84 patients were studied for a mean 3.6 +/- 0.7 years. There was no statistical difference in linear wear rates and annual or total penetration rates when 28-mm and 32-mm heads were compared to 38-mm and 44-mm heads. Volumetric wear was 12.4 mm(3)/y higher with bigger heads. Range of motion did not differ. Larger femoral head sizes show no evidence of an accelerated wear pattern when used with Durasul. Copyright 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19775859     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  10 in total

1.  Constrained cups appear incapable of meeting the demands of revision THA.

Authors:  Philip C Noble; Salim K Durrani; Molly M Usrey; Kenneth B Mathis; Nikolaos V Bardakos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Ideal femoral head size in total hip arthroplasty balances stability and volumetric wear.

Authors:  Michael B Cross; Denis Nam; David J Mayman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-13

3.  Robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty using the MAKO platform.

Authors:  Rupesh Tarwala; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-09

4.  [Larger heads compensate for an increased risk of THA dislocation in high-risk patients].

Authors:  D Zajonz; H Philipp; S Schleifenbaum; R Möbius; N Hammer; R Grunert; T Prietzel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Wear testing and particle characterisation of sequentially crosslinked polyethylene acetabular liners using different femoral head sizes.

Authors:  Carmen Zietz; Christian Fabry; Lars Middelborg; Gerhard Fulda; Wolfram Mittelmeier; Rainer Bader
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 6.  History and systematic review of wear and osteolysis outcomes for first-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Heather A Gawel; Jasmine D Patel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Large Diameter Head in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  G Neupane; R Madhusudhan; A Shrestha; R Vaishya
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Effect of motion inputs on the wear prediction of artificial hip joints.

Authors:  Feng Liu; John Fisher; Zhongmin Jin
Journal:  Tribol Int       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 9.  Importance of preclinical evaluation of wear in hip implant designs using simulator machines.

Authors:  Rafael Mello Trommer; Márcia Marie Maru
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2016-12-30

10.  Long-term performance of oxidized zirconium on conventional and highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alberto V Carli; Anay R Patel; Michael B Cross; David J Mayman; Kaitlin M Carroll; Paul M Pellicci; Seth A Jerabek
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2020-05-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.