Literature DB >> 19772865

An animal model of amnesia that uses Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis to distinguish recollection from familiarity deficits in recognition memory.

H Eichenbaum1, N Fortin, M Sauvage, R J Robitsek, A Farovik.   

Abstract

Here we review our development of an animal model of episodic memory and amnesia that employs a signal detection analyses to characterize recognition memory performance in rats. This approach aims to distinguish episodic recollection of studied items from mere familiarity for recently experienced stimuli, and then to examine the neural basis of these memory processes. Our findings on intact animals indicate that it is possible to distinguish independent components of recognition that are associated with features of recollection and familiarity in humans. Furthermore, we have found that damage limited to the hippocampus results in a selective deficit in recollection and not familiarity. Also, aging and prefrontal damage result in a similar pattern of impaired recollection and spared familiarity. However, whereas the recollection deficit following hippocampal damage can be attributed to the forgetting of studied materials, the impairment following prefrontal damage is due to false alarms, likely reflecting a deficit in source monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19772865      PMCID: PMC2891833          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  45 in total

1.  The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: a formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics.

Authors:  A P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Recollection and familiarity in recognition memory: adult age differences and neuropsychological test correlates.

Authors:  Matthew W Prull; Leslie L Crandell Dawes; A McLeish Martin; Heather F Rosenberg; Leah L Light
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2006-03

3.  Recognition memory: opposite effects of hippocampal damage on recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  Magdalena M Sauvage; Norbert J Fortin; Cullen B Owens; Andrew P Yonelinas; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-25       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 4.  The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory.

Authors:  H Eichenbaum; A P Yonelinas; C Ranganath
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 5.  Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas; Colleen M Parks
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Medial prefrontal cortex supports recollection, but not familiarity, in the rat.

Authors:  Anja Farovik; Laura M Dupont; Miguel Arce; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Cognitive aging: a common decline of episodic recollection and spatial memory in rats.

Authors:  R Jonathan Robitsek; Norbert J Fortin; Ming Teng Koh; Michela Gallagher; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The effects of unitization on familiarity-based source memory: testing a behavioral prediction derived from neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Rachel A Diana; Andrew P Yonelinas; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Robust conjunctive item-place coding by hippocampal neurons parallels learning what happens where.

Authors:  Robert W Komorowski; Joseph R Manns; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  In search of recollection and familiarity signals in the hippocampus.

Authors:  Peter E Wais; Larry R Squire; John T Wixted
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  18 in total

1.  The process-dissociation approach two decades later: convergence, boundary conditions, and new directions.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

Review 2.  Update on memory systems and processes.

Authors:  Lynn Nadel; Oliver Hardt
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 3.  Dissecting the age-related decline on spatial learning and memory tasks in rodent models: N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels in senescent synaptic plasticity.

Authors:  Thomas C Foster
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 11.685

4.  More than a feeling: Pervasive influences of memory without awareness of retrieval.

Authors:  Joel L Voss; Heather D Lucas; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.065

Review 5.  Prefrontal-hippocampal interactions in episodic memory.

Authors:  Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Source accuracy data reveal the thresholded nature of human episodic memory.

Authors:  Iain M Harlow; David I Donaldson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

7.  Remember that? Or does it just seem familiar? A sophisticated test for assessing memory in humans and animals reveals a specific cognitive impairment following general anesthesia in infancy.

Authors:  Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Effects of selective neonatal hippocampal lesions on tests of object and spatial recognition memory in monkeys.

Authors:  Eric Heuer; Jocelyne Bachevalier
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  An animal model of recognition memory and medial temporal lobe amnesia: history and current issues.

Authors:  Robert E Clark; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 10.  Recollection and familiarity in schizophrenia: a quantitative review.

Authors:  Laura A Libby; Andrew P Yonelinas; Charan Ranganath; J Daniel Ragland
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 13.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.