Literature DB >> 19771557

Comparative analysis of OFFGel, strong cation exchange with pH gradient, and RP at high pH for first-dimensional separation of peptides from a membrane-enriched protein fraction.

Bruno Manadas1, Jane A English, Kieran J Wynne, David R Cotter, Michael J Dunn.   

Abstract

The analysis and quantitation of membrane proteins have proved challenging for proteomics. Although several approaches have been introduced to complement gel-based analysis of intact proteins, the literature is rather limited in comparing major emerging approaches. Peptide fractionation using IEF (OFFGel), strong cation exchange HPLC using a pH gradient (SCX-pG), and RP HPLC at high pH, have been shown to increase peptide and protein identification over classic MudPIT approaches. This article compares these three approaches for first-dimensional separation of peptides using a detergent phase (Triton X-114) enriched membrane fraction from mouse cortical brain tissue. Results indicate that RP at high pH (pH 10) was superior for the identification of more peptides and proteins in comparison to the OFFGel or the SCX-pG approaches. In addition, gene ontology analysis (GOMiner) revealed that RP at high pH (pH 10) successfully identified an increased number of proteins with "membrane" ontology, further confirming its suitability for membrane protein analysis, in comparison to SCX-pG and OFFGel techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19771557     DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200900349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  23 in total

1.  Combining isoelectric point-based fractionation, liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry to improve peptide detection and protein identification.

Authors:  Stephanie M Cologna; William K Russell; Peniel J Lim; Gyula Vigh; David H Russell
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Systematic comparison of fractionation methods for in-depth analysis of plasma proteomes.

Authors:  Zhijun Cao; Hsin-Yao Tang; Huan Wang; Qin Liu; David W Speicher
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 3.  Stable isotope dilution mass spectrometry for membrane transporter quantitation.

Authors:  Vahid Farrokhi; Adam J McShane; Reza Nemati; Xudong Yao
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Sub-proteomic fractionation, iTRAQ, and OFFGEL-LC-MS/MS approaches to cardiac proteomics.

Authors:  Chad M Warren; David L Geenen; Donald L Helseth; Hua Xu; R John Solaro
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 5.  Mass spectrometry-based proteomics of endoscopically collected pancreatic fluid in chronic pancreatitis research.

Authors:  Joao A Paulo; Linda S Lee; Bechien Wu; Peter A Banks; Hanno Steen; Darwin L Conwell
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 6.  Liquid-phase-based separation systems for depletion, prefractionation and enrichment of proteins in biological fluids and matrices for in-depth proteomics analysis--an update covering the period 2008-2011.

Authors:  Subhashini Selvaraju; Ziad El Rassi
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.535

7.  Online nanoflow reversed phase-strong anion exchange-reversed phase liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry platform for efficient and in-depth proteome sequence analysis of complex organisms.

Authors:  Feng Zhou; Timothy W Sikorski; Scott B Ficarro; James T Webber; Jarrod A Marto
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Reversed-phase chromatography with multiple fraction concatenation strategy for proteome profiling of human MCF10A cells.

Authors:  Yuexi Wang; Feng Yang; Marina A Gritsenko; Yingchun Wang; Therese Clauss; Tao Liu; Yufeng Shen; Matthew E Monroe; Daniel Lopez-Ferrer; Theresa Reno; Ronald J Moore; Richard L Klemke; David G Camp; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 3.984

9.  A gel-free approach in vascular smooth muscle cell proteome: perspectives for a better insight into activation.

Authors:  Silvia Rocchiccioli; Lorenzo Citti; Claudia Boccardi; Nadia Ucciferri; Lorena Tedeschi; Caterina Lande; Maria Giovanna Trivella; Antonella Cecchettini
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.480

10.  Assessment of global proteome in LNCaP cells by 2D-RP/RP LC-MS/MS following sulforaphane exposure.

Authors:  Gregory W Watson; Samanthi Wickramasekara; Claudia S Maier; David E Williams; Roderick H Dashwood; Emily Ho
Journal:  EuPA Open Proteom       Date:  2015-08-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.