Literature DB >> 21851055

Online nanoflow reversed phase-strong anion exchange-reversed phase liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry platform for efficient and in-depth proteome sequence analysis of complex organisms.

Feng Zhou1, Timothy W Sikorski, Scott B Ficarro, James T Webber, Jarrod A Marto.   

Abstract

The dynamic range of protein expression in complex organisms coupled with the stochastic nature of discovery-driven tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) analysis continues to impede comprehensive sequence analysis and often provides only limited information for low-abundance proteins. High-performance fractionation of proteins or peptides prior to mass spectrometry analysis can mitigate these effects, though achieving an optimal combination of automation, reproducibility, separation peak capacity, and sample yield remains a significant challenge. Here we demonstrate an automated nanoflow 3-D liquid chromatography (LC)-MS/MS platform based on high-pH reversed phase (RP), strong anion exchange (SAX), and low-pH reversed phase (RP) separation stages for analysis of complex proteomes. We observed that RP-SAX-RP outperformed RP-RP for analysis of tryptic peptides derived from Escherichia coli and enabled identification of proteins present at a level of 50 copies per cell in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, corresponding to an estimated detection limit of 500 amol, from 40 μg of total lysate on a low-resolution 3-D ion trap mass spectrometer. A similar study performed on a LTQ-Orbitrap yielded over 4000 unique proteins from 5 μg of total yeast lysate analyzed in a single, 101 fraction RP-SAX-RP LC-MS/MS acquisition, providing an estimated detection limit of 65 amol for proteins expressed at 50 copies per cell.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21851055      PMCID: PMC3196608          DOI: 10.1021/ac200639v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  66 in total

1.  A method for the comprehensive proteomic analysis of membrane proteins.

Authors:  Christine C Wu; Michael J MacCoss; Kathryn E Howell; John R Yates
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Anne-Claude Gingras; Matthias Gstaiger; Brian Raught; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  Peptide separation with immobilized pI strips is an attractive alternative to in-gel protein digestion for proteome analysis.

Authors:  Nina C Hubner; Shubin Ren; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Quantitative analysis of proteome coverage and recovery rates for upstream fractionation methods in proteomics.

Authors:  Yuan Fang; Dale P Robinson; Leonard J Foster
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Highly sensitive proteome analysis of FACS-sorted adult colon stem cells.

Authors:  Serena Di Palma; Daniel Stange; Marc van de Wetering; Hans Clevers; Albert J R Heck; Shabaz Mohammed
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  Proteomic analyses identify a diverse array of nuclear processes affected by small ubiquitin-like modifier conjugation in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Marcus J Miller; Gregory A Barrett-Wilt; Zhihua Hua; Richard D Vierstra
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Time-resolved mass spectrometry of tyrosine phosphorylation sites in the epidermal growth factor receptor signaling network reveals dynamic modules.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Alejandro Wolf-Yadlin; Phillip L Ross; Darryl J Pappin; John Rush; Douglas A Lauffenburger; Forest M White
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2005-06-11       Impact factor: 5.911

8.  Direct analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry.

Authors:  A J Link; J Eng; D M Schieltz; E Carmack; G J Mize; D R Morris; B M Garvik; J R Yates
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks.

Authors:  Jesper V Olsen; Blagoy Blagoev; Florian Gnad; Boris Macek; Chanchal Kumar; Peter Mortensen; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 10.  Proteomics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Organelles.

Authors:  Elena Wiederhold; Liesbeth M Veenhoff; Bert Poolman; Dirk Jan Slotboom
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 5.911

View more
  22 in total

1.  A Chemoproteomic Strategy for Direct and Proteome-Wide Covalent Inhibitor Target-Site Identification.

Authors:  Christopher M Browne; Baishan Jiang; Scott B Ficarro; Zainab M Doctor; Jared L Johnson; Joseph D Card; Sindhu Carmen Sivakumaren; William M Alexander; Tomer M Yaron; Charles J Murphy; Nicholas P Kwiatkowski; Tinghu Zhang; Lewis C Cantley; Nathanael S Gray; Jarrod A Marto
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Highly reproducible improved label-free quantitative analysis of cellular phosphoproteome by optimization of LC-MS/MS gradient and analytical column construction.

Authors:  Nagib Ahsan; Judson Belmont; Zhuo Chen; James G Clifton; Arthur R Salomon
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Proteomic analysis demonstrates activator- and chromatin-specific recruitment to promoters.

Authors:  Timothy W Sikorski; Yoo Jin Joo; Scott B Ficarro; Manor Askenazi; Stephen Buratowski; Jarrod A Marto
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Protein analysis by shotgun/bottom-up proteomics.

Authors:  Yaoyang Zhang; Bryan R Fonslow; Bing Shan; Moon-Chang Baek; John R Yates
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Mass Spectrometry-based Proteomics and Peptidomics for Systems Biology and Biomarker Discovery.

Authors:  Robert Cunningham; Di Ma; Lingjun Li
Journal:  Front Biol (Beijing)       Date:  2012-08-01

6.  Phosphoproteomic profiling of mouse primary HSPCs reveals new regulators of HSPC mobilization.

Authors:  Leo D Wang; Scott B Ficarro; John N Hutchinson; Roland Csepanyi-Komi; Phi T Nguyen; Eva Wisniewski; Jessica Sullivan; Oliver Hofmann; Erzsebet Ligeti; Jarrod A Marto; Amy J Wagers
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Capillary zone electrophoresis-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry as an alternative proteomics platform to ultraperformance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry for samples of intermediate complexity.

Authors:  Yihan Li; Matthew M Champion; Liangliang Sun; Patricia A DiGiuseppe Champion; Roza Wojcik; Norman J Dovichi
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Comparison of in-gel protein separation techniques commonly used for fractionation in mass spectrometry-based proteomic profiling.

Authors:  Mohieddin Jafari; Vincent Primo; Gary B Smejkal; Eugene V Moskovets; Winston P Kuo; Alexander R Ivanov
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.535

9.  Leveraging Compound Promiscuity to Identify Targetable Cysteines within the Kinome.

Authors:  Suman Rao; Deepak Gurbani; Guangyan Du; Robert A Everley; Christopher M Browne; Apirat Chaikuad; Li Tan; Martin Schröder; Sudershan Gondi; Scott B Ficarro; Taebo Sim; Nam Doo Kim; Matthew J Berberich; Stefan Knapp; Jarrod A Marto; Kenneth D Westover; Peter K Sorger; Nathanael S Gray
Journal:  Cell Chem Biol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 8.116

Review 10.  Liquid phase based separation systems for depletion, prefractionation, and enrichment of proteins in biological fluids and matrices for in-depth proteomics analysis-An update covering the period 2011-2014.

Authors:  Chanida Puangpila; Erandi Mayadunne; Ziad El Rassi
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 3.535

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.