Literature DB >> 20537905

Combining isoelectric point-based fractionation, liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry to improve peptide detection and protein identification.

Stephanie M Cologna1, William K Russell, Peniel J Lim, Gyula Vigh, David H Russell.   

Abstract

The off-line coupling of an isoelectric trapping device termed membrane separated wells for isoelectric focusing and trapping (MSWIFT) to mass spectrometry-based proteomic studies is described. The MSWIFT is a high capacity, high-throughput, mass spectrometry-compatible isoelectric trapping device that provides isoelectric point (pI)-based separations of complex mixtures of peptides. In MSWIFT, separation and analyte trapping are achieved by migrating the peptide ions through membranes having fixed pH values until the peptide pI is bracketed by the pH values of adjacent membranes. The pH values of the membranes can be tuned, thus affording a high degree of experimental flexibility. Specific advantages of using MSWIFT for sample prefractionation include: (1) small sample volumes (approximately 200 microL), (2) customized membranes over a large pH range, (3) flexibility in the number of desired fractions, (4) membrane compatibility with a variety of solvents systems, and (5) resulting fractions do not require sample cleanup before MS analysis. Here, we demonstrate the utility of MSWIFT for mass spectrometry-based detection of peptides in improving dynamic range and the reduction of ion suppression effects for high-throughput separations of tryptic peptides. 2010 American Society for Mass Spectrometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20537905      PMCID: PMC2927729          DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2010.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  41 in total

1.  A method for global analysis of complex proteomes using sample prefractionation by solution isoelectrofocusing prior to two-dimensional electrophoresis.

Authors:  X Zuo; D W Speicher
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2000-09-10       Impact factor: 3.365

2.  Preparative-scale, recirculating, pH-biased binary isoelectric trapping separations.

Authors:  Evan Shave; Gyula Vigh
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 3.  Prefractionation techniques in proteome analysis.

Authors:  Pier Giorgio Righetti; Annalisa Castagna; Ben Herbert; Frederic Reymond; Joël S Rossier
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 4.  Current two-dimensional electrophoresis technology for proteomics.

Authors:  Angelika Görg; Walter Weiss; Michael J Dunn
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.984

5.  Use of solution-IEF-fractionation leads to separation of 2673 mouse brain proteins including 255 hydrophobic structures.

Authors:  Jae-Kyung Myung; Gert Lubec
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  A two-dimensional gel database of human plasma proteins.

Authors:  N L Anderson; N G Anderson
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.535

7.  Peptide separation with immobilized pI strips is an attractive alternative to in-gel protein digestion for proteome analysis.

Authors:  Nina C Hubner; Shubin Ren; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.984

8.  Comparative analysis of OFFGel, strong cation exchange with pH gradient, and RP at high pH for first-dimensional separation of peptides from a membrane-enriched protein fraction.

Authors:  Bruno Manadas; Jane A English; Kieran J Wynne; David R Cotter; Michael J Dunn
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 9.  Protein purification in multicompartment electrolyzers with isoelectric membranes.

Authors:  P G Righetti; A Bossi; E Wenisch; G Orsini
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl       Date:  1997-10-10

10.  Identification of N-linked glycoproteins in human saliva by glycoprotein capture and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Prasanna Ramachandran; Pinmannee Boontheung; Yongming Xie; Melissa Sondej; David T Wong; Joseph A Loo
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.466

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Top-down mass spectrometry: recent developments, applications and perspectives.

Authors:  Weidong Cui; Henry W Rohrs; Michael L Gross
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 4.616

2.  IPC 2.0: prediction of isoelectric point and pKa dissociation constants.

Authors:  Lukasz Pawel Kozlowski
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Sample preparation techniques for the untargeted LC-MS-based discovery of peptides in complex biological matrices.

Authors:  Inez Finoulst; Martijn Pinkse; William Van Dongen; Peter Verhaert
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-12-12

Review 4.  Isoelectric Point Separations of Peptides and Proteins.

Authors:  Melissa R Pergande; Stephanie M Cologna
Journal:  Proteomes       Date:  2017-01-25

5.  Proteome-pI 2.0: proteome isoelectric point database update.

Authors:  Lukasz Pawel Kozlowski
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 6.  Biomaterial Based Strategies for Engineering New Lymphatic Vasculature.

Authors:  Kevin T Campbell; Eduardo A Silva
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 11.092

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.