Literature DB >> 19768784

PIE-efficient filters and coarse grained potentials for unbound protein-protein docking.

D V S Ravikant1, Ron Elber.   

Abstract

Identifying correct binding modes in a large set of models is an important step in protein-protein docking. We identified protein docking filter based on overlap area that significantly reduces the number of candidate structures that require detailed examination. We also developed potentials based on residue contacts and overlap areas using a comprehensive learning set of 640 two-chain protein complexes with mathematical programming. Our potential showed substantially better recognition capacity compared to other publicly accessible protein docking potentials in discriminating between native and nonnative binding modes on a large test set of 84 complexes independent of our training set. We were able to rank a near-native model on the top in 43 cases and within top 10 in 51 cases. We also report an atomic potential that ranks a near-native model on the top in 46 cases and within top 10 in 58 cases. Our filter+potential is well suited for selecting a small set of models to be refined to atomic resolution. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19768784      PMCID: PMC2795038          DOI: 10.1002/prot.22550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  48 in total

1.  Protein docking using continuum electrostatics and geometric fit.

Authors:  J G Mandell; V A Roberts; M E Pique; V Kotlovyi; J C Mitchell; E Nelson; I Tsigelny; L F Ten Eyck
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  2001-02

2.  Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein-protein interfaces.

Authors:  F Glaser; D M Steinberg; I A Vakser; N Ben-Tal
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-05-01

3.  Can a pairwise contact potential stabilize native protein folds against decoys obtained by threading?

Authors:  M Vendruscolo; R Najmanovich; E Domany
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-02-01

4.  Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations.

Authors:  D W Ritchie; G J Kemp
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-05-01

5.  BiGGER: a new (soft) docking algorithm for predicting protein interactions.

Authors:  P N Palma; L Krippahl; J E Wampler; J J Moura
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-06-01

6.  On the design and analysis of protein folding potentials.

Authors:  D Tobi; G Shafran; N Linial; R Elber
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-07-01

7.  Protein docking along smooth association pathways.

Authors:  C J Camacho; S Vajda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics.

Authors:  Rong Chen; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2002-05-15

9.  Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes.

Authors:  G Moont; H A Gabb; M J Sternberg
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-05-15

10.  A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  P Uetz; L Giot; G Cagney; T A Mansfield; R S Judson; J R Knight; D Lockshon; V Narayan; M Srinivasan; P Pochart; A Qureshi-Emili; Y Li; B Godwin; D Conover; T Kalbfleisch; G Vijayadamodar; M Yang; M Johnston; S Fields; J M Rothberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  20 in total

1.  Extension of a protein docking algorithm to membranes and applications to amyloid precursor protein dimerization.

Authors:  Shruthi Viswanath; Laura Dominguez; Leigh S Foster; John E Straub; Ron Elber
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-10-14

Review 2.  Sampling and scoring: a marriage made in heaven.

Authors:  Sandor Vajda; David R Hall; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-08-19

3.  Energy design for protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  D V S Ravikant; Ron Elber
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2011-08-14       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Predicting binding poses and affinities for protein - ligand complexes in the 2015 D3R Grand Challenge using a physical model with a statistical parameter estimation.

Authors:  Sergei Grudinin; Maria Kadukova; Andreas Eisenbarth; Simon Marillet; Frédéric Cazals
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 5.  Software for molecular docking: a review.

Authors:  Nataraj S Pagadala; Khajamohiddin Syed; Jack Tuszynski
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2017-01-16

6.  Application of asymmetric statistical potentials to antibody-protein docking.

Authors:  Ryan Brenke; David R Hall; Gwo-Yu Chuang; Stephen R Comeau; Tanggis Bohnuud; Dmitri Beglov; Ora Schueler-Furman; Sandor Vajda; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Toward rationally redesigning bacterial two-component signaling systems using coevolutionary information.

Authors:  Ryan R Cheng; Faruck Morcos; Herbert Levine; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Protein-protein docking by fast generalized Fourier transforms on 5D rotational manifolds.

Authors:  Dzmitry Padhorny; Andrey Kazennov; Brandon S Zerbe; Kathryn A Porter; Bing Xia; Scott E Mottarella; Yaroslav Kholodov; David W Ritchie; Sandor Vajda; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Designing coarse grained-and atom based-potentials for protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Dror Tobi
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2010-11-15

10.  Early Events in the Amyloid Formation of the A546T Mutant of Transforming Growth Factor β-Induced Protein in Corneal Dystrophies Compared to the Nonfibrillating R555W and R555Q Mutants.

Authors:  Heidi Koldsø; Ole Juul Andersen; Camilla Lund Nikolajsen; Carsten Scavenius; Charlotte S Sørensen; Jarl Underhaug; Kasper Runager; Niels Chr Nielsen; Jan J Enghild; Birgit Schiøtt
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.