Literature DB >> 10813819

BiGGER: a new (soft) docking algorithm for predicting protein interactions.

P N Palma1, L Krippahl, J E Wampler, J J Moura.   

Abstract

A new computationally efficient and automated "soft docking" algorithm is described to assist the prediction of the mode of binding between two proteins, using the three-dimensional structures of the unbound molecules. The method is implemented in a software package called BiGGER (Bimolecular Complex Generation with Global Evaluation and Ranking) and works in two sequential steps: first, the complete 6-dimensional binding spaces of both molecules is systematically searched. A population of candidate protein-protein docked geometries is thus generated and selected on the basis of the geometric complementarity and amino acid pairwise affinities between the two molecular surfaces. Most of the conformational changes observed during protein association are treated in an implicit way and test results are equally satisfactory, regardless of starting from the bound or the unbound forms of known structures of the interacting proteins. In contrast to other methods, the entire molecular surfaces are searched during the simulation, using absolutely no additional information regarding the binding sites. In a second step, an interaction scoring function is used to rank the putative docked structures. The function incorporates interaction terms that are thought to be relevant to the stabilization of protein complexes. These include: geometric complementarity of the surfaces, explicit electrostatic interactions, desolvation energy, and pairwise propensities of the amino acid side chains to contact across the molecular interface. The relative functional contribution of each of these interaction terms to the global scoring function has been empirically adjusted through a neural network optimizer using a learning set of 25 protein-protein complexes of known crystallographic structures. In 22 out of 25 protein-protein complexes tested, near-native docked geometries were found with C(alpha) RMS deviations < or =4.0 A from the experimental structures, of which 14 were found within the 20 top ranking solutions. The program works on widely available personal computers and takes 2 to 8 hours of CPU time to run any of the docking tests herein presented. Finally, the value and limitations of the method for the study of macromolecular interactions, not yet revealed by experimental techniques, are discussed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10813819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  66 in total

1.  Soft protein-protein docking in internal coordinates.

Authors:  Juan Fernández-Recio; Maxim Totrov; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  A novel approach for assessing macromolecular complexes combining soft-docking calculations with NMR data.

Authors:  X J Morelli; P N Palma; F Guerlesquin; A C Rigby
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Electrostatic contributions to protein-protein interactions: fast energetic filters for docking and their physical basis.

Authors:  R Norel; F Sheinerman; D Petrey; B Honig
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Protein-protein docking with multiple residue conformations and residue substitutions.

Authors:  David M Lorber; Maria K Udo; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Modeling the structure of agitoxin in complex with the Shaker K+ channel: a computational approach based on experimental distance restraints extracted from thermodynamic mutant cycles.

Authors:  Mats A L Eriksson; Benoît Roux
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Docking and electron transfer studies between rubredoxin and rubredoxin:oxygen oxidoreductase.

Authors:  Bruno L Victor; João B Vicente; Rute Rodrigues; Solange Oliveira; Claudina Rodrigues-Pousada; Carlos Frazão; Cláudio M Gomes; Miguel Teixeira; Cláudio M Soares
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 3.358

7.  Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side-chain flexibility.

Authors:  Martin Zacharias
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  A further investigation of the cytochrome b5-cytochrome c complex.

Authors:  Lucia Banci; Ivano Bertini; Isabella C Felli; Ludwig Krippahl; Karel Kubicek; José J G Moura; Antonio Rosato
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2003-07-19       Impact factor: 3.358

9.  dockYard--a repository to assist modeling of protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Pralay Mitra; Debnath Pal
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 1.810

10.  A Subspace Semi-Definite programming-based Underestimation (SSDU) method for stochastic global optimization in protein docking.

Authors:  Feng Nan; Mohammad Moghadasi; Pirooz Vakili; Sandor Vajda; Dima Kozakov; Ioannis Ch Paschalidis
Journal:  Proc IEEE Conf Decis Control       Date:  2014-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.