Literature DB >> 23015679

Is radical prostatectomy a useful therapeutic option for high-risk prostate cancer in older men?

Markus Graefen1, Thorsten Schlomm.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer affects a high proportion of men over 70 years of age, who are likely to have high-risk disease and a substantial risk of prostate-cancer-specific death. With life expectancy increasing worldwide, the burden of prostate cancer is also expected to rise. Thus, effective management of this high-risk senior patient group is increasingly important. Radical prostatectomy can increase survival and decrease the risk of metastatic progression. Postsurgery complications are affected more by comorbidity than by age. In patients without comorbidities, surgery is associated with a low risk of mortality. Advanced age may increase the likelihood of incontinence following radical prostatectomy, but patients with higher risk disease are no more likely to experience this complication compared with lower risk groups. Treatment decisions should be made after considering the health status and life expectancy of the individual patient. If eligible, the patient should be offered radical prostatectomy as a potentially curative treatment, without a rigid restriction to a certain chronological age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23015679      PMCID: PMC3593781          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-S1-04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  31 in total

1.  Mortality among men with locally advanced prostate cancer managed with noncurative intent: a nationwide study in PCBaSe Sweden.

Authors:  Olof Akre; Hans Garmo; Jan Adolfsson; Mats Lambe; Ola Bratt; Pär Stattin
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Long-term quality-of-life outcomes after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting: the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 randomised trial.

Authors:  Eva Johansson; Gunnar Steineck; Lars Holmberg; Jan-Erik Johansson; Tommy Nyberg; Mirja Ruutu; Anna Bill-Axelson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is feasible and effective in 'fit' senior men with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Dominique Prapotnich; Francois Rozet; Annick Mombet; Nathalie Cathala; Eric Barret; Marc Galiano; Xavier Cathelineau; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Impact of age at diagnosis on prostate cancer treatment and survival.

Authors:  Seth K Bechis; Peter R Carroll; Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy versus external-beam radiotherapy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stephen A Boorjian; R Jeffrey Karnes; Rosalia Viterbo; Laureano J Rangel; Eric J Bergstralh; Eric M Horwitz; Michael L Blute; Mark K Buyyounouski
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Metastasis after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a comparison of clinical cohorts adjusted for case mix.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; James A Eastham; Angel M Cronin; Zvi Fuks; Zhigang Zhang; Yoshiya Yamada; Andrew Vickers; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Colin B Begg; Elyn R Riedel; Peter B Bach; Michael W Kattan; Deborah Schrag; Joan L Warren; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Survival associated with treatment vs observation of localized prostate cancer in elderly men.

Authors:  Yu-Ning Wong; Nandita Mitra; Gary Hudes; Russell Localio; J Sanford Schwartz; Fei Wan; Chantal Montagnet; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Cancer-specific mortality after surgery or radiation for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer managed during the prostate-specific antigen era.

Authors:  Anthony V D'Amico; Judd Moul; Peter R Carroll; Leon Sun; Deborah Lubeck; Ming-Hui Chen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Radical prostatectomy in men aged >or=70 years: effect of age on upgrading, upstaging, and the accuracy of a preoperative nomogram.

Authors:  Lee Richstone; Fernando J Bianco; Hiral H Shah; Michael W Kattan; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Douglas S Scherr
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  3 in total

1.  Physician role in physical activity for African-American males undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Faustine Williams; Kellie R Imm; Graham A Colditz; Ashley J Housten; Lin Yang; Keon L Gilbert; Bettina F Drake
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  The Siconolfi step test: a valid and reliable assessment of cardiopulmonary fitness in older men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Agnieszka Lemanska; Karen Poole; Jonathan J Aning; Bruce A Griffin; Ralph Manders; John M Saxton; Joe Wainwright; Sara Faithfull
Journal:  Eur Rev Aging Phys Act       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.878

3.  The Dilemma of Misclassification Rates in Senior Patients With Prostate Cancer, Who Were Treated With Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Patient Counseling and Diagnostics.

Authors:  Nikolaos Liakos; Joern H Witt; Pawel Rachubinski; Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.