Literature DB >> 17346895

Psychophysical evidence for two routes to suppression before binocular summation of signals in human vision.

D H Baker1, T S Meese, R J Summers.   

Abstract

Visual mechanisms in primary visual cortex are suppressed by the superposition of gratings perpendicular to their preferred orientations. A clear picture of this process is needed to (i) inform functional architecture of image-processing models, (ii) identify the pathways available to support binocular rivalry, and (iii) generally advance our understanding of early vision. Here we use monoptic sine-wave gratings and cross-orientation masking (XOM) to reveal two cross-oriented suppressive pathways in humans, both of which occur before full binocular summation of signals. One is a within-eye (ipsiocular) pathway that is spatially broadband, immune to contrast adaptation and has a suppressive weight that tends to decrease with stimulus duration. The other pathway operates between the eyes (interocular), is spatially tuned, desensitizes with contrast adaptation and has a suppressive weight that increases with stimulus duration. When cross-oriented masks are presented to both eyes, masking is enhanced or diminished for conditions in which either ipsiocular or interocular pathways dominate masking, respectively. We propose that ipsiocular suppression precedes the influence of interocular suppression and tentatively associate the two effects with the lateral geniculate nucleus (or retina) and the visual cortex respectively. The interocular route is a good candidate for the initial pathway involved in binocular rivalry and predicts that interocular cross-orientation suppression should be found in cortical cells with predominantly ipsiocular drive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17346895     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.01.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  30 in total

1.  Spatial and temporal dependencies of cross-orientation suppression in human vision.

Authors:  Tim S Meese; David J Holmes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Enhancement of bistable perception associated with visual stimulus rivalry.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

3.  Steady-state contrast response functions provide a sensitive and objective index of amblyopic deficits.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Mathieu Simard; Dave Saint-Amour; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Attention model of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Li; James Rankin; John Rinzel; Marisa Carrasco; David J Heeger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A monocular contribution to stimulus rivalry.

Authors:  Jan Brascamp; Hansem Sohn; Sang-Hun Lee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Functional burden of strabismus: decreased binocular summation and binocular inhibition.

Authors:  Stacy L Pineles; Federico G Velez; Sherwin J Isenberg; Zachary Fenoglio; Eileen Birch; Steven Nusinowitz; Joseph L Demer
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 7.389

7.  Binocular Summation and Control of Intermittent Exotropia.

Authors:  Fatma Yulek; Federico G Velez; Sherwin J Isenberg; Joseph L Demer; Stacy L Pineles
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  2017-05-08

8.  Retinal cross talk in the mammalian visual system.

Authors:  Xiaolan Tang; Radouil Tzekov; Christopher L Passaglia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Neuronal convergence in early contrast vision: binocular summation is followed by response nonlinearity and area summation.

Authors:  Tim S Meese; Robert J Summers
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Contrast versus identity encoding in the face image follow distinct orientation selectivity profiles.

Authors:  Christianne Jacobs; Kirsten Petras; Pieter Moors; Valerie Goffaux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.