Literature DB >> 10996616

Signal detection theory in the 2AFC paradigm: attention, channel uncertainty and probability summation.

C W Tyler1, C C Chen.   

Abstract

Neural implementation of classical High-Threshold Theory reveals fundamental flaws in its applicability to realistic neural systems and to the two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) paradigm. For 2AFC, Signal Detection Theory provides a basis for accurate analysis of the observer's attentional strategy and effective degree of probability summation over attended neural channels. The resulting theory provides substantially different predictions from those of previous approximation analyses. In additive noise, attentional probability summation depends on the attentional model assumed. (1) For an ideal attentional strategy in additive noise, summation proceeds at a diminishing rate from an initial level of fourth-root summation for the first few channels. The maximum improvement asymptotes to about a factor of 4 by a million channels. (2) For a fixed attention field in additive noise, detection is highly inefficient at first and approximates fourth-root summation through the summation range. (3) In physiologically plausible root-multiplicative noise, on the other hand, attentional probability summation mimics a linear improvement in sensitivity up to about ten channels, approaching a factor of 1000 by a million channels. (4) Some noise sources, such as noise from eye movements, are fully multiplicative and would prevent threshold determination within their range of effectiveness. Such results may require reappraisal of previous interpretations of detection behavior in the 2AFC paradigm.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10996616     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00157-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  37 in total

1.  Detecting gustatory-olfactory flavor mixtures: models of probability summation.

Authors:  Lawrence E Marks; Maria G Veldhuizen; Timothy G Shepard; Adam Y Shavit
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Senescent changes in photopic spatial summation.

Authors:  Maka Malania; Frédéric Devinck; Kenneth Knoblauch; Peter B Delahunt; Joseph L Hardy; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Low-level integration of auditory and visual motion signals requires spatial co-localisation.

Authors:  Georg F Meyer; Sophie M Wuerger; Florian Röhrbein; Christoph Zetzsche
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Classification images with uncertainty.

Authors:  Bosco S Tjan; Anirvan S Nandy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  A cortical pooling model of spatial summation for perimetric stimuli.

Authors:  Fei Pan; William H Swanson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Detection of Gabor patterns of different sizes, shapes, phases and eccentricities.

Authors:  John M Foley; Srinivasa Varadharajan; Chin C Koh; Mylene C Q Farias
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Relationships between the threshold and slope of psychometric and neurometric functions during perceptual learning: implications for neuronal pooling.

Authors:  Joshua I Gold; Chi-Tat Law; Patrick Connolly; Sharath Bennur
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Deconstructing multisensory enhancement in detection.

Authors:  Mario Pannunzi; Alexis Pérez-Bellido; Alexandre Pereda-Baños; Joan López-Moliner; Gustavo Deco; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  How mechanisms of perceptual decision-making affect the psychometric function.

Authors:  Joshua I Gold; Long Ding
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 11.685

10.  Symmetry: modeling the effects of masking noise, axial cueing and salience.

Authors:  Chien-Chung Chen; Christopher W Tyler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.