Literature DB >> 19750129

Field and Experience Influences on Ethical Decision-Making in the Sciences.

Michael D Mumford1, Shane Connelly, Stephen T Murphy, Lynn D Devenport, Alison L Antes, Ryan P Brown, Jason H Hill, Ethan P Waples.   

Abstract

Differences across fields and experience levels are frequently considered in discussions of ethical decision-making and ethical behavior. In the present study, doctoral students in the health, biological, and social sciences completed measures of ethical decision-making. The effects of field and level of experience with respect to ethical decision-making, metacognitive reasoning strategies, social-behavioral responses, and exposure to unethical events were examined. Social and biological scientists performed better than health scientists with respect to ethical decision-making. Furthermore, the ethical decision-making of health science students decreased as experience increased. Moreover, these effects appeared to be linked to the specific strategies underlying participants' ethical decision-making. The implications of these findings for ethical decision-making are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19750129      PMCID: PMC2742372          DOI: 10.1080/10508420903035257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethics Behav        ISSN: 1050-8422


  13 in total

1.  Advice Taking in Decision Making: Egocentric Discounting and Reputation Formation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process       Date:  2000-11

2.  The relationship between ethical ideology and ethical behavior intentions: an exploratory look at physicians' responses to managed care dilemmas.

Authors:  J K Eastman; K L Eastman; M A Tolson
Journal:  J Bus Ethics       Date:  2001-06

3.  The persistence of fraud in the literature: the Darsee case.

Authors:  Carol Ann Kochan; John M Budd
Journal:  J Am Soc Inf Sci       Date:  1992-08

Review 4.  The psychology of doing nothing: forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion.

Authors:  Christopher J Anderson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  A personality scale of manifest anxiety.

Authors:  J A TAYLOR
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1953-04

6.  Scientists behaving badly.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Melissa S Anderson; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Fostering integrity in research: definitions, current knowledge, and future directions.

Authors:  Nicholas H Steneck
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  The pursuit of self-interest: self-interest bias in attitude judgment and persuasion.

Authors:  Peter R Darke; Shelly Chaiken
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2005-12

9.  Fraud strikes top genome lab.

Authors:  E Marshall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-11-08       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Innovation and integrity in biomedical research.

Authors:  S Jasanoff
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.893

View more
  11 in total

1.  A Comparison of the Effects of Ethics Training on International and US Students.

Authors:  Logan M Steele; James F Johnson; Logan L Watts; Alexandra E MacDougall; Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly; T H Lee Williams
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Continuous Evaluation in Ethics Education: A Case Study.

Authors:  Tristan McIntosh; Cory Higgs; Michael Mumford; Shane Connelly; James DuBois
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Self-Focused Emotions and Ethical Decision-Making: Comparing the Effects of Regulated and Unregulated Guilt, Shame, and Embarrassment.

Authors:  Cory Higgs; Tristan McIntosh; Shane Connelly; Michael Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  The Role of Culture and Acculturation in Researchers' Perceptions of Rules in Science.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Tammy English; Kari A Baldwin; James M DuBois
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Differences in Biases and Compensatory Strategies Across Discipline, Rank, and Gender Among University Academics.

Authors:  Vincent Giorgini; Carter Gibson; Jensen T Mecca; Kelsey E Medeiros; Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly; Lynn D Devenport
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  What Explains Associations of Researchers' Nation of Origin and Scores on a Measure of Professional Decision-Making? Exploring Key Variables and Interpretation of Scores.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Tammy English; Kari A Baldwin; James M DuBois
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Individual and organizational predictors of the ethicality of graduate students' responses to research integrity issues.

Authors:  Philip J Langlais; Blake J Bent
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  A Meta-Analysis of Ethics Instruction Effectiveness in the Sciences.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Stephen T Murphy; Ethan P Waples; Michael D Mumford; Ryan P Brown; Shane Connelly; Lynn D Devenport
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2009-09-01

9.  Competition and Sensemaking in Ethical Situations.

Authors:  Jay J Caughron; Alison L Antes; Cheryl K Stenmark; Chaise E Thiel; Xiaoqian Wang; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  J Appl Soc Psychol       Date:  2013-06-16

10.  Assessing the need for a research ethics remediation program.

Authors:  James M DuBois; Emily E Anderson; John Chibnall
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 4.689

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.