Literature DB >> 11056071

Advice Taking in Decision Making: Egocentric Discounting and Reputation Formation.

.   

Abstract

Our framework for understanding advice-taking in decision making rests on two theoretical concepts that motivate the studies and serve to explain the findings. The first is egocentric discounting of others' opinions and the second is reputation formation for advisors. Advice discounting is attributed to differential information, namely, the notion that decision makers have privileged access to their internal reasons for holding their own opinion, but not to the advisors' internal reasons. Reputation formation is related to the negativity effect in impression formation and to the trust asymmetry principle. In three studies we measured decision makers' weighting policy for advice and, in a fourth study, their willingness to pay for it. Briefly, we found that advice is discounted relative to one's own opinion, while advisors' reputations are rapidly formed and asymmetrically revised. The asymmetry implies that it may be easier for advisors to lose a good reputation than to gain one. The cognitive and social origins of these phenomena are considered. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Year:  2000        PMID: 11056071     DOI: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process        ISSN: 0749-5978


  45 in total

1.  Doomed to repeat the successes of the past: history is best forgotten for repeated choices with nonstationary payoffs.

Authors:  Tim Rakow; Katherine Miler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-10

2.  Reach and speed of judgment propagation in the laboratory.

Authors:  Mehdi Moussaïd; Stefan M Herzog; Juliane E Kämmer; Ralph Hertwig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Disparate foundations of scientists' policy positions on contentious biomedical research.

Authors:  Achim Edelmann; James Moody; Ryan Light
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Creativity and Ethics: The Relationship of Creative and Ethical Problem-Solving.

Authors:  Michael D Mumford; Ethan P Waples; Alison L Antes; Ryan P Brown; Shane Connelly; Stephen T Murphy; Lynn D Devenport
Journal:  Creat Res J       Date:  2010-02-01

5.  Ostracism Reduces Reliance on Poor Advice from Others during Decision Making.

Authors:  Kaileigh A Byrne; Thomas P Tibbett; Lauren N Laserna; Adrienne R Carter-Sowell; Darrell A Worthy
Journal:  J Behav Decis Mak       Date:  2015-06-12

6.  To you I am listening: perceived competence of advisors influences judgment and decision-making via recruitment of the amygdala.

Authors:  L Schilbach; S B Eickhoff; T Schultze; A Mojzisch; K Vogeley
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.083

7.  Individuals fail to reap the collective benefits of diversity because of over-reliance on personal information.

Authors:  Alan Novaes Tump; Max Wolf; Jens Krause; Ralf H J M Kurvers
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Competition and Sensemaking in Ethical Situations.

Authors:  Jay J Caughron; Alison L Antes; Cheryl K Stenmark; Chaise E Thiel; Xiaoqian Wang; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  J Appl Soc Psychol       Date:  2013-06-16

9.  Field and Experience Influences on Ethical Decision-Making in the Sciences.

Authors:  Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly; Stephen T Murphy; Lynn D Devenport; Alison L Antes; Ryan P Brown; Jason H Hill; Ethan P Waples
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2009-07-01

10.  Equality bias impairs collective decision-making across cultures.

Authors:  Ali Mahmoodi; Dan Bang; Karsten Olsen; Yuanyuan Aimee Zhao; Zhenhao Shi; Kristina Broberg; Shervin Safavi; Shihui Han; Majid Nili Ahmadabadi; Chris D Frith; Andreas Roepstorff; Geraint Rees; Bahador Bahrami
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.