| Literature DB >> 16393021 |
Peter R Darke1, Shelly Chaiken.
Abstract
Self-interest affected the direction of attitudes in 4 studies exploring attitude judgment and persuasion. Experiment 1 showed that both self-interest and symbolic concerns predicted attitudes. The biasing role of self-interest in producing the well-known persuasion effects of personal relevance and argument strength was examined by disentangling the competing effects of personal costs and benefits. Experiment 2 used a standard personal relevance manipulation in the absence of supportive arguments and showed that perceptions of personal costs associated with the advocated policy partially mediated its negative effects on attitudes. Experiments 3 and 4 independently manipulated the onset of personal costs associated with an issue and the onset of issue-related benefits conveyed by supportive arguments. Postmessage attitudes were an additive function of personal costs and argument-specified benefits, and perceived costs and benefits biased information processing in a self-interested manner. A revised conception of personal relevance and argument strength is discussed. Copyright 2006 APA, all rights reserved.Mesh:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16393021 DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.864
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pers Soc Psychol ISSN: 0022-3514