Literature DB >> 16393021

The pursuit of self-interest: self-interest bias in attitude judgment and persuasion.

Peter R Darke1, Shelly Chaiken.   

Abstract

Self-interest affected the direction of attitudes in 4 studies exploring attitude judgment and persuasion. Experiment 1 showed that both self-interest and symbolic concerns predicted attitudes. The biasing role of self-interest in producing the well-known persuasion effects of personal relevance and argument strength was examined by disentangling the competing effects of personal costs and benefits. Experiment 2 used a standard personal relevance manipulation in the absence of supportive arguments and showed that perceptions of personal costs associated with the advocated policy partially mediated its negative effects on attitudes. Experiments 3 and 4 independently manipulated the onset of personal costs associated with an issue and the onset of issue-related benefits conveyed by supportive arguments. Postmessage attitudes were an additive function of personal costs and argument-specified benefits, and perceived costs and benefits biased information processing in a self-interested manner. A revised conception of personal relevance and argument strength is discussed. Copyright 2006 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16393021     DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  10 in total

1.  A Measure of Perceived Argument Strength: Reliability and Validity.

Authors:  Xiaoquan Zhao; Andrew Strasser; Joseph N Cappella; Caryn Lerman; Martin Fishbein
Journal:  Commun Methods Meas       Date:  2011-03-04

2.  The Effect of Message Frames on Public Attitudes Toward Criminal Justice Reform for Nonviolent Offenses.

Authors:  Aaron Gottlieb
Journal:  Crime Delinq       Date:  2017-01-01

3.  Flexibility now, consistency later: psychological distance and construal shape evaluative responding.

Authors:  Alison Ledgerwood; Yaacov Trope; Shelly Chaiken
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-07

4.  Selection and Transmission Processes for Information in the Emerging Media Environment: Psychological Motives and Message Characteristics.

Authors:  Joseph N Cappella; Hyun Suk Kim; Dolores Albarracín
Journal:  Media Psychol       Date:  2015-07-01

5.  Sensemaking Strategies for Ethical Decision-making.

Authors:  Jay J Caughron; Alison L Antes; Cheryl K Stenmark; Chaise E Thiel; Xiaoqian Wang; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct

6.  Competition and Sensemaking in Ethical Situations.

Authors:  Jay J Caughron; Alison L Antes; Cheryl K Stenmark; Chaise E Thiel; Xiaoqian Wang; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  J Appl Soc Psychol       Date:  2013-06-16

7.  Field and Experience Influences on Ethical Decision-Making in the Sciences.

Authors:  Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly; Stephen T Murphy; Lynn D Devenport; Alison L Antes; Ryan P Brown; Jason H Hill; Ethan P Waples
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2009-07-01

8.  The case for intervention bias in the practice of medicine.

Authors:  Andrew J Foy; Edward J Filippone
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2013-06-13

9.  How do incentives lead to deception in advisor-client interactions? Explicit and implicit strategies of self-interested deception.

Authors:  Barbara Mackinger; Eva Jonas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-04

Review 10.  Neuroimaging, neuromodulation, and population health: the neuroscience of chronic disease prevention.

Authors:  Peter A Hall; Warren K Bickel; Kirk I Erickson; Dylan D Wagner
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 5.691

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.