Literature DB >> 8939122

Commentary: evidence based practice and antenatal ultrasonography--the need for more studies.

P Chamberlain1, P A Boyd.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1996        PMID： 8939122      PMCID： PMC2352579          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.313.7067.1254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Value of routine ultrasound scanning at 19 weeks: a four year study of 8849 deliveries.

Authors:  C A Luck
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-06-06

2.  Continuing with pregnancy after a diagnosis of lethal abnormality: experience of five couples and recommendations for management.

Authors:  L S Chitty; C A Barnes; C Berry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-24

3.  Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. RADIUS Study Group.

Authors:  B G Ewigman; J P Crane; F D Frigoletto; M L LeFevre; R P Bain; D McNellis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  The timing factor in the pathophysiology of the intrauterine growth retardation syndrome.

Authors:  J Villar; J M Belizan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 2.347

5.  Specificity of antenatal ultrasound in the Yorkshire Region: a prospective study of 2261 ultrasound detected anomalies.

Authors:  I R Brand; P Kaminopetros; M Cave; H C Irving; R J Lilford
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1994-05

6.  Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancy. The Helsinki Ultrasound Trial.

Authors:  A Saari-Kemppainen; O Karjalainen; P Ylöstalo; O P Heinonen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-08-18       Impact factor: 79.321
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.