Yukako Yoshikane1, Toshiyuki Yoshizato2, Yoshiko Otake3, Naoki Fusazaki4, Hirotsugu Obama3, Shingo Miyamoto3, Shinichi Hirose1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan. 2. Center for Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan. ty-obgyn@cis.fukuoka-u.ac.jp. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan. 4. Department of Neonatal Cardiology, Fukuoka Children's Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defect at the referral level in our institution. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two cases were referred for prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defect (CHD). Cases having CHDs were divided into isolated and complex CHDs, and the prenatal and postnatal diagnoses were compared. RESULTS: Thirty-nine cases were diagnosed with CHDs. The remaining 93 cases were diagnosed as normal. Postnatal diagnosis confirmed that 39 cases had CHDs; there were 19 cases of isolated CHD and 20 cases of complex CHD. Among the 19 cases of isolated CHD, all four cases with a false negative diagnosis had ventricular septal defects of an outlet or muscular type with a small defect. Cases with a false positive diagnosis had coarctation of the aorta (3 cases) or total anomalous pulmonary venous connection (1 case). Among the 20 cases of complex CHD, the prenatal diagnoses in two cases were not the same as the postnatal diagnosis and the prognosis was worse than expected. In one case with a single ventricle, pulmonary stenosis, and pulmonary venous atresia, the prenatal diagnosis was hypoplastic left heart syndrome with a suboptimal study at 38 weeks' gestation. In the other case, the diagnosis of corrected transposition of the great arteries had been missed because of misinterpretation of the anatomically right and left ventricles in utero. CONCLUSIONS: There were three possible causes of misdiagnosis or overdiagnosis of CHD: disease orientation, timing of diagnosis, and skill of the examiners. This information may be helpful for the improvement of diagnosis.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defect at the referral level in our institution. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two cases were referred for prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defect (CHD). Cases having CHDs were divided into isolated and complex CHDs, and the prenatal and postnatal diagnoses were compared. RESULTS: Thirty-nine cases were diagnosed with CHDs. The remaining 93 cases were diagnosed as normal. Postnatal diagnosis confirmed that 39 cases had CHDs; there were 19 cases of isolated CHD and 20 cases of complex CHD. Among the 19 cases of isolated CHD, all four cases with a false negative diagnosis had ventricular septal defects of an outlet or muscular type with a small defect. Cases with a false positive diagnosis had coarctation of the aorta (3 cases) or total anomalous pulmonary venous connection (1 case). Among the 20 cases of complex CHD, the prenatal diagnoses in two cases were not the same as the postnatal diagnosis and the prognosis was worse than expected. In one case with a single ventricle, pulmonary stenosis, and pulmonary venous atresia, the prenatal diagnosis was hypoplastic left heart syndrome with a suboptimal study at 38 weeks' gestation. In the other case, the diagnosis of corrected transposition of the great arteries had been missed because of misinterpretation of the anatomically right and left ventricles in utero. CONCLUSIONS: There were three possible causes of misdiagnosis or overdiagnosis of CHD: disease orientation, timing of diagnosis, and skill of the examiners. This information may be helpful for the improvement of diagnosis.
Authors: C Ferencz; J D Rubin; R J McCarter; J I Brenner; C A Neill; L W Perry; S I Hepner; J W Downing Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1985-01 Impact factor: 4.897