Literature DB >> 19744649

Predictive knowledge of stimulus relevance does not influence top-down suppression of irrelevant information in older adults.

Theodore P Zanto1, Kelly Hennigan, Mattias Ostberg, Wesley C Clapp, Adam Gazzaley.   

Abstract

Our ability to focus attention on task-relevant stimuli and ignore irrelevant distractions is reflected by differential enhancement and suppression of neural activity in sensory cortices. Previous research has shown that older adults exhibit a deficit in suppressing task-irrelevant information, the magnitude of which is associated with a decline in working memory performance. However, it remains unclear if a failure to suppress is a reflection of an inability of older adults to rapidly assess the relevance of information upon stimulus presentation when they are not aware of the relevance beforehand. To address this, we recorded the electroencephalogram (EEG) in healthy older participants (aged 60-80 years) while they performed two different versions of a selective face/scene working memory task, both with and without prior knowledge as to when relevant and irrelevant stimuli would appear. Each trial contained two faces and two scenes presented sequentially followed by a 9 sec delay and a probe stimulus. Participants were given the following instructions: remember faces (ignore scenes), remember scenes (ignore faces), remember the xth and yth stimuli (where x and y could be 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th), or passively view all stimuli. Working memory performance remained consistent regardless of task instructions. Enhanced neural activity was observed at posterior electrodes to attended stimuli, while neural responses that reflected the suppression of irrelevant stimuli was absent for both tasks. The lack of significant suppression at early stages of visual processing was revealed by P1 amplitude and N1 latency modulation indices. These results reveal that prior knowledge of stimulus relevance does not modify early neural processing during stimulus encoding and does not improve working memory performance in older adults. These results suggest that the inability to suppress irrelevant information early in the visual processing stream by older adults is related to mechanisms specific to top-down suppression. Published by Elsevier Srl.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19744649      PMCID: PMC2826515          DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  40 in total

Review 1.  Neuroimaging studies of attention: from modulation of sensory processing to top-down control.

Authors:  Luiz Pessoa; Sabine Kastner; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Age-related top-down suppression deficit in the early stages of cortical visual memory processing.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Wesley Clapp; Jon Kelley; Kevin McEvoy; Robert T Knight; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; E K Vogel; S J Luck
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Age differences and similarities in the effects of cues and prompts.

Authors:  A A Hartley; J M Kieley; E H Slabach
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.

Authors:  T A Salthouse
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 7.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; L Anllo-Vento
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Effectiveness of attentional cueing in older and younger adults.

Authors:  M J Nissen; S Corkin
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1985-03

9.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

10.  Aging and Visual Attention.

Authors:  David J Madden
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-04
View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Influence of early attentional modulation on working memory.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  The impact of executive capacity and age on mechanisms underlying multidimensional feature selection.

Authors:  Katherine K Mott; Brittany R Alperin; Anne M Fox; Phillip J Holcomb; Kirk R Daffner
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Deficit in switching between functional brain networks underlies the impact of multitasking on working memory in older adults.

Authors:  Wesley C Clapp; Michael T Rubens; Jasdeep Sabharwal; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Predictive cues and age-related declines in working memory performance.

Authors:  Namita A Padgaonkar; Theodore P Zanto; Jacob Bollinger; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 5.  Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  Executive functions.

Authors:  Adele Diamond
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 7.  Cognitive aging: is there a dark side to environmental support?

Authors:  Ulman Lindenberger; Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Cholinergic enhancement of functional networks in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Judy Pa; Anne S Berry; Mariana Compagnone; Jacqueline Boccanfuso; Ian Greenhouse; Michael T Rubens; Julene K Johnson; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  Age-related differences in enhancement and suppression of neural activity underlying selective attention in matched young and old adults.

Authors:  A E Haring; T Y Zhuravleva; B R Alperin; D M Rentz; P J Holcomb; K R Daffner
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Older adults, unlike younger adults, do not modulate alpha power to suppress irrelevant information.

Authors:  Ryan J Vaden; Nathan L Hutcheson; Lesley A McCollum; Jonathan Kentros; Kristina M Visscher
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.