Literature DB >> 3973359

Effectiveness of attentional cueing in older and younger adults.

M J Nissen, S Corkin.   

Abstract

It has been proposed that aging selectively affects cognitive processes that are effortful rather than automatic and that active, memory-driven attentional selectivity is impaired in old adults. The present study evaluated attentional selectivity in two groups of healthy adults: a younger group with mean age 19.4 years and an older group with mean age 63.6 years. A visual simple reaction time task was used in which a warning cue appearing at the beginning of each trial indicated the probable location of the target signal. Response times of both groups were shortest when the stimulus appeared at the expected location and longest when it appeared at the unexpected location; responses of both groups were also faster on trials with a 3-s warning interval compared with a 2-s warning interval. These effects of spatial and temporal expectancy were as substantial in older adults as in younger adults. Reasons for the difference between these findings and earlier results are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3973359     DOI: 10.1093/geronj/40.2.185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol        ISSN: 0022-1422


  15 in total

1.  An expectation-based memory deficit in aging.

Authors:  Jacob Bollinger; Michael T Rubens; Edrick Masangkay; Jonathan Kalkstein; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Allocation of visual attention in younger and older adults.

Authors:  A A Hartley; J Kieley; C R McKenzie
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-08

3.  On the time course of attentional focusing in older adults.

Authors:  Lisa N Jefferies; Alexa B Roggeveen; James T Enns; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-15

4.  Endogenous visuospatial precuing effects as a function of age and task demands.

Authors:  D J Tellinghuisen; L D Zimba; D A Robin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-08

5.  Predictive cues and age-related declines in working memory performance.

Authors:  Namita A Padgaonkar; Theodore P Zanto; Jacob Bollinger; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.673

6.  Using neuronal populations to study the mechanisms underlying spatial and feature attention.

Authors:  Marlene R Cohen; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Behavioral and Neural Markers of Flexible Attention over Working Memory in Aging.

Authors:  Robert M Mok; Nicholas E Myers; George Wallis; Anna Christina Nobre
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Enhancing Spatial Attention and Working Memory in Younger and Older Adults.

Authors:  Camarin E Rolle; Joaquin A Anguera; Sasha N Skinner; Bradley Voytek; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Timing of reflexive visuospatial orienting in young, young-old, and old-old adults.

Authors:  Linda K Langley; Chris Kelland Friesen; Alyson L Saville; Annie T Ciernia
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Predictive knowledge of stimulus relevance does not influence top-down suppression of irrelevant information in older adults.

Authors:  Theodore P Zanto; Kelly Hennigan; Mattias Ostberg; Wesley C Clapp; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 4.027

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.