Literature DB >> 2144568

Age differences and similarities in the effects of cues and prompts.

A A Hartley1, J M Kieley, E H Slabach.   

Abstract

A series of 6 experiments investigated the use of cues and prompts by younger and older adults. Cues provide useful information about an impending target, even though the information is not always valid. Prompts provide an instruction about what aspect of the target is to be responded to. The costs and benefits of cues were most consistent with models in which the attentional resources that are shifted in response to the cue were as large or larger in older adults as they were in younger adults. The results with both cues and prompts converged on the conclusion that the time course of processing and using a cue or prompt is the same in younger and older adults. The attentional resources tapped by these procedures cannot be the diminished processing resource to which many age differences in cognitive performance are attributed.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2144568     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.16.3.523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  22 in total

1.  An expectation-based memory deficit in aging.

Authors:  Jacob Bollinger; Michael T Rubens; Edrick Masangkay; Jonathan Kalkstein; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Allocation of visual attention in younger and older adults.

Authors:  A A Hartley; J Kieley; C R McKenzie
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-08

3.  Reflexive orienting in response to short- and long-duration gaze cues in young, young-old, and old-old adults.

Authors:  Nora D Gayzur; Linda K Langley; Chris Kelland; Sara V Wyman; Alyson L Saville; Annie T Ciernia; Ganesh Padmanabhan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Endogenous visuospatial precuing effects as a function of age and task demands.

Authors:  D J Tellinghuisen; L D Zimba; D A Robin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-08

5.  Predictive cues and age-related declines in working memory performance.

Authors:  Namita A Padgaonkar; Theodore P Zanto; Jacob Bollinger; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.673

6.  The effect of multisensory cues on attention in aging.

Authors:  Jeannette R Mahoney; Joe Verghese; Kristina Dumas; Cuiling Wang; Roee Holtzer
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Functional brain and age-related changes associated with congruency in task switching.

Authors:  Teal S Eich; David Parker; Dan Liu; Hwamee Oh; Qolamreza Razlighi; Yunglin Gazes; Christian Habeck; Yaakov Stern
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  The link between reading ability and visual spatial attention across development.

Authors:  Alex L White; Geoffrey M Boynton; Jason D Yeatman
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Response-specific slowing in older age revealed through differential stimulus and response effects on P300 latency and reaction time.

Authors:  Theodore R Bashore; Scott A Wylie; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Jacques M Martinerie
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2013-11-06

10.  Functional and neurobiological similarities of aging in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  M L Voytko
Journal:  Age (Omaha)       Date:  1997-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.