Literature DB >> 19739641

Failure to ferment dietary resistant starch in specific mouse models of obesity results in no body fat loss.

June Zhou1, Roy J Martin, Richard T Tulley, Anne M Raggio, Li Shen, Elizabeth Lissy, Kathleen McCutcheon, Michael J Keenan.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Resistant starch (RS) is a fermentable fiber that decreases dietary energy density and results in fermentation in the lower gut. The current studies examined the effect of RS on body fat loss in mice. In a 12 week study (study 1), the effect of two different types of RS on body fat was compared with two control diets (0% RS) in C57Bl/6J mice: regular control diet or the control diet that had energy density equal to that of the RS diet (EC). All testing diets had 7% (w/w) dietary fat. In a 16 week study (study 2), the effect of RS on body fat was compared with EC in C57BL/6J mice and two obese mouse models (NONcNZO10/LtJ or Non/ShiLtJ). All mice were fed control (0% RS) or 30% RS diet for 6 weeks with 7% dietary fat. On the seventh week, the dietary fat was increased to 11% for half of the mice and remained the same for the rest. Body weight, body fat, energy intake, energy expenditure, and oral glucose tolerance were measured during the study. At the end of the studies, the pH of cecal contents was measured as an indicator of RS fermentation. Compared with EC, dietary RS decreased body fat and improved glucose tolerance in C57BL/6J mice but not in obese mice. For other metabolic characteristics measured, the alterations by RS diet were similar for all three types of mice. The difference in dietary fat did not interfere with these results. The pH of cecal contents in RS fed mice was decreased for C57BL/6J mice but not for obese mice, implying the impaired RS fermentation in obese mice.
CONCLUSIONS: (1) decreased body fat by RS is not simply due to dietary energy dilution in C57Bl/6J mice, and (2) along with their inability to ferment RS, RS fed obese mice did not lose body fat. Thus, colonic fermentation of RS might play an important role in the effect of RS on fat loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19739641      PMCID: PMC2766351          DOI: 10.1021/jf901548e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  27 in total

Review 1.  Changing the energy density of the diet as a strategy for weight management.

Authors:  Barbara J Rolls; Adam Drewnowski; Jenny H Ledikwe
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2005-05

Review 2.  Dietary fiber and body weight.

Authors:  Joanne L Slavin
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.008

3.  AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory rodents: final report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc writing committee on the reformulation of the AIN-76A rodent diet.

Authors:  P G Reeves; F H Nielsen; G C Fahey
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Effects of dietary glycaemic index on adiposity, glucose homoeostasis, and plasma lipids in animals.

Authors:  Dorota B Pawlak; Jake A Kushner; David S Ludwig
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Aug 28-Sep 3       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Resistant starch has little effect on appetite, food intake and insulin secretion of healthy young men.

Authors:  N de Roos; M L Heijnen; C de Graaf; G Woestenenk; E Hobbel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Resistant starch decreases serum total cholesterol and triacylglycerol concentrations in rats.

Authors:  E A de Deckere; W J Kloots; J M van Amelsvoort
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Calculation and determination of metabolizable energy in mixed diets to humans.

Authors:  H Göranzon; E Forsum; M Thilén
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Amylopectin starch promotes the development of insulin resistance in rats.

Authors:  S E Byrnes; J C Miller; G S Denyer
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.798

9.  Obesity alters gut microbial ecology.

Authors:  Ruth E Ley; Fredrik Bäckhed; Peter Turnbaugh; Catherine A Lozupone; Robin D Knight; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Starch intake and colorectal cancer risk: an international comparison.

Authors:  A Cassidy; S A Bingham; J H Cummings
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  25 in total

1.  Dietary-resistant starch improves maternal glycemic control in Goto-Kakizaki rat.

Authors:  Li Shen; Michael J Keenan; Anne Raggio; Cathy Williams; Roy J Martin
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 5.914

Review 2.  Improving healthspan via changes in gut microbiota and fermentation.

Authors:  Michael J Keenan; Maria L Marco; Donald K Ingram; Roy J Martin
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2015-09-14

3.  Starving our microbial self: the deleterious consequences of a diet deficient in microbiota-accessible carbohydrates.

Authors:  Erica D Sonnenburg; Justin L Sonnenburg
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 27.287

4.  The importance of GLP-1 and PYY in resistant starch's effect on body fat in mice.

Authors:  June Zhou; Roy J Martin; Anne M Raggio; Li Shen; Kathleen McCutcheon; Michael J Keenan
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 5.914

5.  Role of resistant starch on diabetes risk factors in people with prediabetes: Design, conduct, and baseline results of the STARCH trial.

Authors:  Kara L Marlatt; Ursula A White; Robbie A Beyl; Courtney M Peterson; Corby K Martin; Maria L Marco; Michael J Keenan; Roy J Martin; Kayanush J Aryana; Eric Ravussin
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Obese ZDF rats fermented resistant starch with effects on gut microbiota but no reduction in abdominal fat.

Authors:  Felicia Goldsmith; Justin Guice; Ryan Page; David A Welsh; Christopher M Taylor; Eugene E Blanchard; Meng Luo; Anne M Raggio; Rhett W Stout; Diana Carvajal-Aldaz; Amanda Gaither; Christine Pelkman; Jianping Ye; Roy J Martin; James Geaghan; Holiday A Durham; Diana Coulon; Michael J Keenan
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 5.914

7.  High-amylose resistant starch increases hormones and improves structure and function of the gastrointestinal tract: a microarray study.

Authors:  Michael J Keenan; Roy J Martin; Anne M Raggio; Kathleen L McCutcheon; Ian L Brown; Anne Birkett; Susan S Newman; Jihad Skaf; Maren Hegsted; Richard T Tulley; Eric Blair; June Zhou
Journal:  J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics       Date:  2012-04-20

8.  Tolerance, fermentation, and cytokine expression in healthy aged male C57BL/6J mice fed resistant starch.

Authors:  June Zhou; Michael J Keenan; Jeffrey Keller; Sun O Fernandez-Kim; Paul J Pistell; Richard T Tulley; Anne M Raggio; Li Shen; Hanjie Zhang; Roy J Martin; Marc R Blackman
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 5.914

Review 9.  Role of resistant starch in improving gut health, adiposity, and insulin resistance.

Authors:  Michael J Keenan; June Zhou; Maren Hegsted; Christine Pelkman; Holiday A Durham; Diana B Coulon; Roy J Martin
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 8.701

10.  High fat diet partially attenuates fermentation responses in rats fed resistant starch from high-amylose maize.

Authors:  Jason A Charrier; Roy J Martin; Kathleen L McCutcheon; Anne M Raggio; Felicia Goldsmith; M'famara Goita; Reshani N Senevirathne; Ian L Brown; Christine Pelkman; June Zhou; John Finley; Holiday A Durham; Michael J Keenan
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 5.002

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.