Literature DB >> 19739370

Pollinator specialization and pollination syndromes of three related North American Silene.

Richard J Reynolds1, M Jody Westbrook, Alexandra S Rohde, Julie M Cridland, Charles B Fenster, Michele R Dudash.   

Abstract

Community and biogeographic surveys often conclude that plant-pollinator interactions are highly generalized. Thus, a central implication of the pollination syndrome concept, that floral trait evolution occurs primarily via specialized interactions of plants with their pollinators, has been questioned. However, broad surveys may not distinguish whether flower visitors are actual pollen vectors and hence lack power to assess the relationship between syndrome traits and the pollinators responsible for their evolution. Here we address whether the floral traits of three closely related hermaphroditic Silene spp. native to eastern North America (S. caroliniana, S. virginica, and S. stellata) correspond to predicted specialized pollination based on floral differences among the three species and the congruence of these floral features with recognized pollination syndromes. A nocturnal/diurnal pollinator exclusion experiment demonstrated that all three Silene spp. have diurnal pollinators, and only S. stellata has nocturnal pollinators. Multiyear studies of visitation rates demonstrated that large bees, hummingbirds, and nocturnal moths were the most frequent pollinators of S. caroliniana, S. virginica, and S. stellata, respectively. Estimates of pollen grains deposited and removed per visit generally corroborated the visitation rate results for all three species. However, the relatively infrequent diurnal hawkmoth pollinators of S. caroliniana were equally effective and more efficient than the most frequent large bee visitors. Pollinator importance (visitation X deposition) of each of the animal visitors to each species was estimated and demonstrated that in most years large bees and nocturnal moths were the most important pollinators of S. caroliniana and S. stellata, respectively. By quantifying comprehensive aspects of the pollination process we determined that S. virginica and S. stellata were specialized on hummingbirds and nocturnal moths, respectively, and S. caroliniana was the least specialized with diurnal hawkmoth and large bee pollinators. Compared across the Silene species, divergent floral character states are consistent with increasing the attraction and/or pollen transfer efficiency of their respective major pollinators, which suggests that the pollinators are past and/or contemporary selective agents for floral trait evolution in these three Silene species. We conclude that the pollination syndrome concept allows us to effectively relate the functional significance of floral morphology to the major pollinators of these Silene species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19739370     DOI: 10.1890/08-1141.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  24 in total

1.  Variable nursery pollinator importance and its effect on plant reproductive success.

Authors:  Richard J Reynolds; Abigail A R Kula; Charles B Fenster; Michele R Dudash
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Diel Variation in Flower Scent Reveals Poor Consistency of Diurnal and Nocturnal Pollination Syndromes in Sileneae.

Authors:  Samuel Prieto-Benítez; Stefan Dötterl; Luis Giménez-Benavides
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Floral divergence, pollinator partitioning and the spatiotemporal pattern of plant-pollinator interactions in three sympatric Adenophora species.

Authors:  Chang-Qiu Liu; Shuang-Quan Huang
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Comparison of population genetic structures of the plant Silene stellata and its obligate pollinating seed predator moth Hadena ectypa.

Authors:  Juannan Zhou; Michele R Dudash; Elizabeth A Zimmer; Charles B Fenster
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Temporal stability of pollinator preference in an alpine plant community and its implications for the evolution of floral traits.

Authors:  Yan-Bing Gong; Shuang-Quan Huang
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  Plant-pollinator interactions along the pathway to paternity.

Authors:  Corneile Minnaar; Bruce Anderson; Marinus L de Jager; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Association between community assemblage of flower colours and pollinator fauna: a comparison between Japanese and New Zealand alpine plant communities.

Authors:  Hiroshi S Ishii; Masahiro X Kubota; Shohei G Tsujimoto; Gaku Kudo
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Scent matters: differential contribution of scent to insect response in flowers with insect vs. wind pollination traits.

Authors:  Theresa N Wang; Marie R Clifford; Jesús Martínez-Gómez; Jens C Johnson; Jeffrey A Riffell; Verónica S Di Stilio
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 9.  Modularity and intra-floral integration in metameric organisms: plants are more than the sum of their parts.

Authors:  Pamela K Diggle
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Circadian rhythm of a Silene species favours nocturnal pollination and constrains diurnal visitation.

Authors:  Samuel Prieto-Benítez; Stefan Dötterl; Luis Giménez-Benavides
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.