Literature DB >> 26538282

Diel Variation in Flower Scent Reveals Poor Consistency of Diurnal and Nocturnal Pollination Syndromes in Sileneae.

Samuel Prieto-Benítez1, Stefan Dötterl2, Luis Giménez-Benavides3.   

Abstract

The composition of flower scent and the timing of emission are crucial for chemical communication between plants and their pollinators; hence, they are key traits for the characterization of pollination syndromes. In many plants, however, plants are assigned to a syndrome based on inexpensive to measure flower traits, such as color, time of flower opening, and shape. We compared day and night scents from 31 Sileneae species and tested for quantitative and semi-quantitative differences in scent among species classified a priori as diurnal or nocturnal. As most Sileneae species are not only visited by either diurnal or nocturnal animals as predicted by their syndrome, we hypothesized that, even if flower scent were preferentially emitted during the day or at night, most species also would emit some scents during the opposing periods of the day. This phenomenon would contribute to the generalized assemblage of flower visitors usually observed in Sileneae species. We found that diel variations of scent often were not congruent with the syndrome definition, but could partially be explained by taxonomy and sampling times. Most species emitted compounds with attractive potential to insects during both the night and day. Our results highlight the current opinion that syndromes are not watertight compartments evolved to exclude some flower visitors. Thus, important information may be lost when scents are collected either during day- or night-time, depending on the a priori classification of the species as diurnal or nocturnal.

Keywords:  Floral scent; Nyctinasty; Pollination syndrome; Silene

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26538282     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-015-0645-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  17 in total

1.  Floral odour and reproductive isolation in two species of Silene.

Authors:  M O Waelti; J K Muhlemann; A Widmer; F P Schiestl
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 2.411

2.  A global test of the pollination syndrome hypothesis.

Authors:  Jeff Ollerton; Ruben Alarcón; Nickolas M Waser; Mary V Price; Stella Watts; Louise Cranmer; Andrew Hingston; Craig I Peter; John Rotenberry
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 3.  A quantitative review of pollination syndromes: do floral traits predict effective pollinators?

Authors:  Víctor Rosas-Guerrero; Ramiro Aguilar; Silvana Martén-Rodríguez; Lorena Ashworth; Martha Lopezaraiza-Mikel; Jesús M Bastida; Mauricio Quesada
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Pollinator specialization and pollination syndromes of three related North American Silene.

Authors:  Richard J Reynolds; M Jody Westbrook; Alexandra S Rohde; Julie M Cridland; Charles B Fenster; Michele R Dudash
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Systematics of Euromediterranean Silene (Caryophyllaceae): evidence from a phylogenetic analysis using ITS sequences.

Authors:  C Desfeux; B Lejeune
Journal:  C R Acad Sci III       Date:  1996-04

6.  Floral scents repel facultative flower visitors, but attract obligate ones.

Authors:  Robert R Junker; Nico Blüthgen
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Floral volatile alleles can contribute to pollinator-mediated reproductive isolation in monkeyflowers (Mimulus).

Authors:  Kelsey J R P Byers; James P Vela; Foen Peng; Jeffrey A Riffell; Harvey D Bradshaw
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 6.417

8.  Qualitative and quantitative analyses of flower scent in Silene latifolia.

Authors:  Stefan Dötterl; Lorne M Wolfe; Andreas Jürgens
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.072

9.  Synergistic effects of non-Apis bees and honey bees for pollination services.

Authors:  Claire Brittain; Neal Williams; Claire Kremen; Alexandra-Maria Klein
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Electroantennogram responses ofHyles lineata (Sphingidae: Lepidoptera) to volatile compounds fromClarkia breweri (Onagraceae) and other moth-pollinated flowers.

Authors:  R A Raguso; D M Light; E Pickersky
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Understanding intraspecific variation of floral scent in light of evolutionary ecology.

Authors:  Roxane Delle-Vedove; Bertrand Schatz; Mathilde Dufay
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  The Floral Signals of the Inconspicuous Orchid Malaxis monophyllos: How to Lure Small Pollinators in an Abundant Environment.

Authors:  Edyta Jermakowicz; Joanna Leśniewska; Marcin Stocki; Aleksandra M Naczk; Agata Kostro-Ambroziak; Artur Pliszko
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-21

3.  Circadian rhythm of a Silene species favours nocturnal pollination and constrains diurnal visitation.

Authors:  Samuel Prieto-Benítez; Stefan Dötterl; Luis Giménez-Benavides
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 4.  Dark Matters: Challenges of Nocturnal Communication Between Plants and Animals in Delivery of Pollination Services.

Authors:  Renee M Borges
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2018-03-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.