Literature DB >> 21253770

Temporal stability of pollinator preference in an alpine plant community and its implications for the evolution of floral traits.

Yan-Bing Gong1, Shuang-Quan Huang.   

Abstract

A traditional view of diverse floral traits is that they reflect differences in foraging preferences of pollinators. The role of pollinators in the evolution of floral traits has been questioned recently by broad community surveys, especially studies concerning variation in pollinator assemblages and visitation frequency, which suggest a diminished role of pollinators in floral evolution. Here, we investigate the relationships between six categories of floral traits of 29 species and 10 pollinator functional groups in an alpine meadow in the Hengduan Mountains of China, over three consecutive years. Simpson's diversity index was used to estimate the level of pollinator generalization of each plant species by considering both pollinator groups and their relative visitation frequencies. Multivariate analyses indicated that eight of the ten pollinator groups showed constant preferences for at least two floral traits, leading to a relatively stable level of ecological generalization for most floral traits (two out of three categories), despite the fact that the level of generalization of the entire community varied across years. Shape preferences of butterflies, honeybees and beeflies varied such that open flowers exhibited a lower level of ecological generalization in 2007 than closed flowers, in contrast with the other 2 years. These results suggest that temporally stabilized preferences of diverse pollinators may contribute to the evolution of specialized versus generalized floral traits; however, their role may be moderated by variation in community structure, including both the composition and abundance of plants and pollinators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21253770     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-1910-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  20 in total

1.  Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 2.  Evolution of floral symmetry.

Authors:  P K Endress
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.834

3.  Characterizing ecological generalization in plant-pollination systems.

Authors:  Heather F Sahli; Jeffrey K Conner
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Point and interval estimation of pollinator importance: a study using pollination data of Silene caroliniana.

Authors:  Richard J Reynolds; Charles B Fenster
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  A global test of the pollination syndrome hypothesis.

Authors:  Jeff Ollerton; Ruben Alarcón; Nickolas M Waser; Mary V Price; Stella Watts; Louise Cranmer; Andrew Hingston; Craig I Peter; John Rotenberry
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Temporal dynamics in a pollination network.

Authors:  Jens M Olesen; Jordi Bascompte; Heidi Elberling; Pedro Jordano
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.499

7.  Floral symmetry: pollinator-mediated stabilizing selection on flower size in bilateral species.

Authors:  Yan-Bing Gong; Shuang-Quan Huang
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Pollination biology in a lowland dipterocarp forest inSarawak, Malaysia. I. Characteristics of the plant-pollinator communityin a lowland dipterocarp forest.

Authors:  K Momose; T Yumoto; T Nagamitsu; M Kato; H Nagamasu; S Sakai; R Harrison; T Itioka; A Hamid; T Inoue
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.844

9.  Plant generalization on pollinators: species property or local phenomenon?

Authors:  Carlos M Herrera
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.844

10.  Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus).

Authors:  D W Schemske; H D Bradshaw
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  7 in total

1.  Optimizing size thresholds in a plant-pollinator interaction web: towards a mechanistic understanding of ecological networks.

Authors:  Sébastien Ibanez
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  How phylogeny shapes the taxonomic and functional structure of plant-insect networks.

Authors:  Sébastien Ibanez; Fabien Arène; Sébastien Lavergne
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Feeding the enemy: loss of nectar and nectaries to herbivores reduces tepal damage and increases pollinator attraction in Iris bulleyana.

Authors:  Ya-Ru Zhu; Min Yang; Jana C Vamosi; W Scott Armbruster; Tao Wan; Yan-Bing Gong
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Relative stability of core groups in pollination networks in a biodiversity hotspot over four years.

Authors:  Qiang Fang; Shuang-Quan Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Change of floral orientation within an inflorescence affects pollinator behavior and pollination efficiency in a bee-pollinated plant, Corydalis sheareri.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Shuang Tie; Dan Yu; You-Hao Guo; Chun-Feng Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Floral traits influence pollen vectors' choices in higher elevation communities in the Himalaya-Hengduan Mountains.

Authors:  Yan-Hui Zhao; Zong-Xin Ren; Amparo Lázaro; Hong Wang; Peter Bernhardt; Hai-Dong Li; De-Zhu Li
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.964

7.  Ovule and seed production patterns in relation to flower size variations in actinomorphic and zygomorphic flower species.

Authors:  Jun Mochizuki; Tomoyuki Itagaki; Yuta Aoyagi Blue; Masaya Ito; Satoki Sakai
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 3.276

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.