Literature DB >> 27676595

How Patients View Lung Cancer Screening. The Role of Uncertainty in Medical Decision Making.

Marilyn M Schapira1,2, Charu Aggarwal3, Scott Akers4,5, Jaya Aysola1, Diana Imbert1, Corey Langer3, Charlie B Simone6, Emily Strittmatter1, Anil Vachani7,5, Liana Fraenkel8,9.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Radiographic lung cancer screening guidelines and coverage requirements warrant a shared decision-making process. Guidance is needed regarding how to conduct shared decision making effectively. A useful organizing theme should include consideration of a patient's response to and tolerance of uncertainty associated with lung cancer screening.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to: (1) describe how patients respond to specific categories of uncertainty in the context of lung cancer screening, and (2) inform strategies for addressing concerns about uncertainty as part of the shared decision making.
METHODS: We performed two series of structured interviews on participants in a convenience sample of current or former cigarette smokers recruited from primary care and pulmonary practices in Philadelphia. An interview guide included prompts related to benefits, harms, and responses to general and specific types of uncertainty (stochastic, statistical, and evidentiary) associated with lung cancer screening. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and independently coded by two investigators. An inductive analysis was conducted, and major themes were identified.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-two adults participated in the study. Sixty-eight percent were men, 72% were black or African American, and 50% met U.S. Preventive Services Task Force criteria for lung cancer screening. The primary themes to emerge from our study were: (1) the desire to decrease uncertainty may motivate lung cancer screening decisions; (2) uncertainty is an attribute of health states that impacts how patients weigh benefits and harms of lung cancer screening; (3) patient understanding and tolerance of uncertainty varies across stochastic, statistical, and evidentiary uncertainty; and (4) provider-patient communication may mitigate intolerance of uncertainty in the context of lung cancer screening.
CONCLUSIONS: A systematic approach to understanding and addressing patients' concerns about uncertainty in the context of lung cancer screening can guide a patient-centered approach to shared decision making. The results of this study can inform provider-patient communication strategies regarding the decision to perform radiographic lung cancer screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambiguity; communication; decision making; lung cancer screening; uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27676595      PMCID: PMC5122480          DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201604-290OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc        ISSN: 2325-6621


  29 in total

1.  On "black swans" and "perfect storms": risk analysis and management when statistics are not enough.

Authors:  Elisabeth Paté-Cornell
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Communication of uncertainty regarding individualized cancer risk estimates: effects and influential factors.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; William M P Klein; Tom Lehman; Bill Killam; Holly Massett; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  'The thing is not knowing': patients' perspectives on surveillance of an indeterminate pulmonary nodule.

Authors:  Renda Soylemez Wiener; Michael K Gould; Steven Woloshin; Lisa M Schwartz; Jack A Clark
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  Evidence-based risk communication: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniella A Zipkin; Craig A Umscheid; Nancy L Keating; Elizabeth Allen; KoKo Aung; Rebecca Beyth; Scott Kaatz; Devin M Mann; Jeremy B Sussman; Deborah Korenstein; Connie Schardt; Avishek Nagi; Richard Sloane; David A Feldstein
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Frequency or probability? A qualitative study of risk communication formats used in health care.

Authors:  M M Schapira; A B Nattinger; C A McHorney
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Communicating patient-reported outcome scores using graphic formats: results from a mixed-methods evaluation.

Authors:  Michael D Brundage; Katherine C Smith; Emily A Little; Elissa T Bantug; Claire F Snyder
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Perceived ambiguity, fatalism, and believing cancer is more prevalent than heart disease.

Authors:  William M P Klein; Rebecca A Ferrer; Kaitlin A Graff; Annette R Kaufman; Paul K J Han
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 8.  Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a systematic review to update the US Preventive services task force recommendation.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Deffebach; Miranda Pappas; Christina Baumann; Kathryn Artis; Jennifer Priest Mitchell; Bernadette Zakher; Rongwei Fu; Christopher G Slatore
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Aversion to ambiguity regarding medical tests and treatments: measurement, prevalence, and relationship to sociodemographic factors.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Bryce B Reeve; Richard P Moser; William M P Klein
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2009-09

10.  'I still don't know diddly': a longitudinal qualitative study of patients' knowledge and distress while undergoing evaluation of incidental pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Donald R Sullivan; Sara E Golden; Linda Ganzini; Lissi Hansen; Christopher G Slatore
Journal:  NPJ Prim Care Respir Med       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 2.871

View more
  20 in total

1.  The complicated 'Yes': Decision-making processes and receptivity to lung cancer screening among head and neck cancer survivors.

Authors:  Aaron T Seaman; Kimberly Dukes; Richard M Hoffman; Alan J Christensen; Nicholas Kendell; Andrew L Sussman; Miriam Veléz-Bermúdez; Robert J Volk; Nitin A Pagedar
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-04-22

2.  Impact of lymph node management on resectable non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Apichat Tantraworasin; Somcharoen Saeteng; Sophon Siwachat; Tawatchai Jiarawasupornchai; Nirush Lertprasertsuke; Sarawut Kongkarnka; Chidchanok Ruengorn; Jayanton Patumanond; Emanuela Taioli; Raja M Flores
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Development and Field Testing of a Long-Term Care Decision Aid Website for Older Adults: Engaging Patients and Caregivers in User-Centered Design.

Authors:  Aubri S Hoffman; Daniel R Bateman; Craig Ganoe; Sukdith Punjasthitkul; Amar K Das; Derek B Hoffman; Ashley J Housten; Hillary A Peirce; Larissa Dreyer; Chen Tang; Alina Bennett; Stephen J Bartels
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2020-07-15

Review 4.  A Review of Shared Decision-Making and Patient Decision Aids in Radiation Oncology.

Authors:  Kristina Demas Woodhouse; Katie Tremont; Anil Vachani; Marilyn M Schapira; Neha Vapiwala; Charles B Simone; Abigail T Berman
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Shared Decision-making in Early Adopting Lung Cancer Screening Programs: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Renda Soylemez Wiener; Elisa Koppelman; Rendelle Bolton; Karen E Lasser; Belinda Borrelli; David H Au; Christopher G Slatore; Jack A Clark; Hasmeena Kathuria
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Lung Cancer Screening Uncertainty among Patients Undergoing LDCT.

Authors:  Daniel L Hall; Inga T Lennes; Alaina Carr; Justin R Eusebio; Gloria Y Yeh; Elyse R Park
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2018-01-01

7.  Numeracy and Understanding of Quantitative Aspects of Predictive Models: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Gary E Weissman; Kuldeep N Yadav; Vanessa Madden; Katherine R Courtright; Joanna L Hart; David A Asch; Marilyn M Schapira; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.342

8.  A qualitative study exploring why individuals opt out of lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Lisa Carter-Harris; Susan Brandzel; Karen J Wernli; Joshua A Roth; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  Promoting Clinical Conversations about Lung Cancer Screening: Exploring the Role of Perceived Online Social Support.

Authors:  Samantha R Paige; Ramzi G Salloum; Janice L Krieger; Maribeth Williams; Wei Xue; Babette Brumback
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2020-10-29

10.  Preferences for Predictive Model Characteristics among People Living with Chronic Lung Disease: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Gary E Weissman; Kuldeep N Yadav; Trishya Srinivasan; Stephanie Szymanski; Florylene Capulong; Vanessa Madden; Katherine R Courtright; Joanna L Hart; David A Asch; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Marilyn M Schapira; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.