Literature DB >> 19730410

Primer extension capture: targeted sequence retrieval from heavily degraded DNA sources.

Adrian W Briggs1, Jeffrey M Good, Richard E Green, Johannes Krause, Tomislav Maricic, Udo Stenzel, Svante Pääbo.   

Abstract

We present a method of targeted DNA sequence retrieval from DNA sources which are heavily degraded and contaminated with microbial DNA, as is typical of ancient bones. The method greatly reduces sample destruction and sequencing demands relative to direct PCR or shotgun sequencing approaches. We used this method to reconstruct the complete mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) genomes of five Neandertals from across their geographic range. The mtDNA genetic diversity of the late Neandertals was approximately three times lower than that of contemporary modern humans. Together with analyses of mtDNA protein evolution, these data suggest that the long-term effective population size of Neandertals was smaller than that of modern humans and extant great apes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19730410      PMCID: PMC3150061          DOI: 10.3791/1573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


Protocol

This method was used in the research reported in Briggs . AmpliTaq Gold DNA Polymerase 10x GeneAmp PCR Buffer II MgCl2 25mM dNTP mix, 25 mM each BSA, 10 mg ml-1 in water Molecular biology-grade water EB buffer (supplied with MinElute PCR Purification kit); 10 mM Tris HCl, pH 8.5 MinElute PCR Purification Kit M-270 streptavidin Dynabeads 2x Binding and Wash (BW) buffer (2 M NaCl, 10 mM Tris-Cl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, 0.2% Tween 20) 1x Binding and Wash (BW) buffer (2x BindWash buffer diluted 2X in water) Hot Wash (HW) buffer (2.5mM MgCl, 1X Taq Gold buffer, 0.1% Tween 20)

Reagents required:

For manufacturer information regarding non-standard reagents and equipment see later table. The DNA template here is a 454 library prepared from a low copy number DNA source as described in (Rohland and Hofreiter, 2007a, 2007b) and (Maricic and Pääbo, 2009). To amplify the whole library, prepare the following PCR mix: Use the following PCR program in a Thermo cycler for 14 cycles amplification 95°C 12min 95°C 30s 60°C (or desired annealing temp) 1 min 72°C 1 min Go to 2 (x 13) 72°C 5min 10°C ∞ Purify the reaction over a Qiagen MinElute spin column according to the manufacturer's instructions. Elute in 50 μl buffer EB. Quantify the purified amplified product as well as an aliquot of the unamplified library with qPCR (Meyer et al., 2007). If the amplified product has more than 1 X 1012 copies per ul, reduce the amount of template in the following Primer Extension step to ensure that not more than 2 X 1012 copies are added to the Primer Extension reaction. Prepare a master mix for the required number of reactions. Run the following program in a Thermocycler for the single primer extension reaction: 95°C 12min 60°C (or your PEC primer annealing temp if different) 1 min 72°C 5 min 72°C forever!CRITICAL STEP Keep reaction after extension at 72 °C. Then directly pipette 150ul PBI or PB buffer for QIAGEN MinElute purification into the tubes before removing from the heat block. This is important to avoid non-specific primer annealing and capture as the mixture cools. Purify the reaction over a Qiagen MinElute spin column, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Elute in 50 μl EB. Resuspend stock solution of M-270 beads by vortexing. Take out 25 μl bead suspension per sample. Wash the beads twice with 500ul 2x BW buffer and resuspend in 25 μl 2xBW buffer per sample. Add 25 μl eluate from step 2.3 to 25 μl bead suspension from step 3.1. Mix then rotate for 15 min at room temperature. Recommended: keep remaining 5 ul of the eluate from step 2.3 for qPCR quantification. Transfer the whole mixture to a fresh 1.5ml tube (this helps to reduce carryover of non-target library fragments). Pellet the supernatant using the Magnetic particle collector (MPC) and discard the supernatant. Wash 5 times with 500 μl 1xBW buffer (many washes help to remove as much background as possible). After the last washing step, spin down briefly and remove the last traces of supernatant. Add 500μl 1x Hot Wash (HW) buffer. Shake for 2 min at 65 °C (or 5C above the PEC primer Tm) on a thermal block. Remove the supernatant quickly after this, to minimize cooling down. (This step is to remove background fragments still associated with the PEC primers but not actually extended on during the extension step). Remove the last traces of supernatant. Resuspend the bead pellet in 30 μl EB buffer. Transfer the whole mixture to a fresh 1.5ml tube (this helps to reduce carryover of non-target library fragments). Incubate at 95 °C for 3 minutes in a thermal cycler for elution. Place in the MPC and remove the supernatant, taking care to leave the beads behind. Prepare a PCR master mix for the required number of samples. Use the following PCR program in a Thermo cycler for 14 cycles amplification: 95°C 12min 95°C 30s 60°C (or desired annealing temp) 1 min 72°C 1 min Go to 2 (x 13) 72°C 5min 10°C ∞ Purify the reaction over a Qiagen MinElute silica spin column according to the manufacturer's instructions. Elute in 50 μl EB buffer. The product can be now used either for a second round of capture, starting at step 2.1, or entered directly into the 454 emulsion PCR protocol, for sequencing.

Representative Results:

It is strongly recommended when starting out with the PEC protocol to perform first a capture reaction where a small amount of a 'positive control target sequence' (e.g. a ~100bp PCR product - 1 picogram is easily enough) is mixed in with the normal recommended amount of amplified 454 library template (see step 2.1), and capture is performed with a single PEC primer designed to capture the positive control product. If this control reaction is performed, qPCR with both positive control-specific and 454 adaptor-specific primer pairs can be used to quantify the amount of 'control target' versus background in the purified primer extension reaction (1.3), primer extension product (2.3) and eluted bead capture product (3.6). In this way, both the effectiveness of background removal ("specificity") and the efficiency of target recovery ("sensitivity") in your experimental conditions can be directly measured. A successful PEC protocol normally has the following properties – Sensitivity (measured by amount of control target retained through the protocol): Total amount of control target in eluted bead capture product (3.6) =~ 1-20% of total amount in purified primer extension reaction (2.3). Background (measured by 454 emPCR primer pair): Total amount of background in eluted bead capture product (3.6) < 0.01% of total amount in purified primer extension reaction (2.3). If there is less than 1% of the target remaining in the final product, the primer extension step may have been unsuccessful and should be investigated. If there is much more than 0.01% of the background remaining in the final products, the washing steps may have been incorrectly performed and should be investigated.

Discussion

The PEC method is simple, quick, sensitive and specific. Therefore we the authors envisage multiple applications outside ancient DNA, such as capture of small RNA fragments from an RNA library, interrogation of structural variation in a pooled sample or capture of 16S (or other loci) diversity from a metagenomic sample. One point to mention is that the sensitivity of capture becomes lower as the number of PEC primers in a multiplex capture reaction increases. PEC is therefore not ideally suited for capture of very large (e.g. a megabase or more) capture regions, but is extremely well suited for capture of small target regions or even SNP positions from many individuals in a rapid fashion.
Reagentμl per reaction
Water45
10X Gene Amp PCR buffer II10
MgCl2 (25mM)10
BSA (10 mg / ml) 2
dNTPs (25 mM each)1
454 emPCR fwd primer/10uM3
454 emPCR rvs primer/10uM3
AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (5 U / μl)1
454 DNA library template 25
Total100
Reagentμl per reaction
Water45
10X Gene Amp PCR buffer II10
MgCl2 (25mM)10
BSA (10 mg / ml) 2
dNTPs (25 mM each)1
454 emPCR fwd primer/10uM3
454 emPCR rvs primer/10uM3
AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (5 U / μl)1
454 DNA library template 25
Total100
Reagentμl per reaction
Water45
10X Gene Amp PCR buffer II10
MgCl2 (25mM)10
BSA (10 mg / ml) 2
dNTPs (25 mM each)1
454 emPCR fwd primer/10uM3
454 emPCR rvs primer/10uM3
AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (5 U / μl)1
Eluted capture product 25
Total100
  5 in total

1.  Ancient DNA extraction from bones and teeth.

Authors:  Nadin Rohland; Michael Hofreiter
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Comparison and optimization of ancient DNA extraction.

Authors:  Nadin Rohland; Michael Hofreiter
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.993

3.  Optimization of 454 sequencing library preparation from small amounts of DNA permits sequence determination of both DNA strands.

Authors:  Tomislav Maricic; Svante Pääbo
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.993

4.  Targeted retrieval and analysis of five Neandertal mtDNA genomes.

Authors:  Adrian W Briggs; Jeffrey M Good; Richard E Green; Johannes Krause; Tomislav Maricic; Udo Stenzel; Carles Lalueza-Fox; Pavao Rudan; Dejana Brajkovic; Zeljko Kucan; Ivan Gusic; Ralf Schmitz; Vladimir B Doronichev; Liubov V Golovanova; Marco de la Rasilla; Javier Fortea; Antonio Rosas; Svante Pääbo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  From micrograms to picograms: quantitative PCR reduces the material demands of high-throughput sequencing.

Authors:  Matthias Meyer; Adrian W Briggs; Tomislav Maricic; Barbara Höber; Barbara Höffner; Johannes Krause; Antje Weihmann; Svante Pääbo; Michael Hofreiter
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

  5 in total
  15 in total

1.  Removal of deaminated cytosines and detection of in vivo methylation in ancient DNA.

Authors:  Adrian W Briggs; Udo Stenzel; Matthias Meyer; Johannes Krause; Martin Kircher; Svante Pääbo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Partial uracil-DNA-glycosylase treatment for screening of ancient DNA.

Authors:  Nadin Rohland; Eadaoin Harney; Swapan Mallick; Susanne Nordenfelt; David Reich
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Ancestry of modern Europeans: contributions of ancient DNA.

Authors:  Marie Lacan; Christine Keyser; Eric Crubézy; Bertrand Ludes
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome.

Authors:  Johannes Krause; Adrian W Briggs; Tomislav Maricic; Udo Stenzel; Martin Kircher; Nick Patterson; Richard E Green; Heng Li; Weiwei Zhai; Markus Hsi-Yang Fritz; Nancy F Hansen; Eric Y Durand; Anna-Sapfo Malaspinas; Jeffrey D Jensen; Tomas Marques-Bonet; Can Alkan; Kay Prüfer; Matthias Meyer; Hernán A Burbano; Jeffrey M Good; Rigo Schultz; Ayinuer Aximu-Petri; Anne Butthof; Barbara Höber; Barbara Höffner; Madlen Siegemund; Antje Weihmann; Chad Nusbaum; Eric S Lander; Carsten Russ; Nathaniel Novod; Jason Affourtit; Michael Egholm; Christine Verna; Pavao Rudan; Dejana Brajkovic; Željko Kucan; Ivan Gušic; Vladimir B Doronichev; Liubov V Golovanova; Carles Lalueza-Fox; Marco de la Rasilla; Javier Fortea; Antonio Rosas; Ralf W Schmitz; Philip L F Johnson; Evan E Eichler; Daniel Falush; Ewan Birney; James C Mullikin; Montgomery Slatkin; Rasmus Nielsen; Janet Kelso; Michael Lachmann; David Reich; Svante Pääbo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Neanderthal genomics and the evolution of modern humans.

Authors:  James P Noonan
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 6.  Paleopopulation genetics.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wall; Montgomery Slatkin
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 16.830

7.  Capturing Darwin's dream.

Authors:  Travis C Glenn; Brant C Faircloth
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.090

Review 8.  Mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy in the emerging field of massively parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Rebecca S Just; Jodi A Irwin; Walther Parson
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 4.882

9.  A high-coverage Neandertal genome from Vindija Cave in Croatia.

Authors:  Kay Prüfer; Cesare de Filippo; Steffi Grote; Fabrizio Mafessoni; Petra Korlević; Mateja Hajdinjak; Benjamin Vernot; Laurits Skov; Pinghsun Hsieh; Stéphane Peyrégne; David Reher; Charlotte Hopfe; Sarah Nagel; Tomislav Maricic; Qiaomei Fu; Christoph Theunert; Rebekah Rogers; Pontus Skoglund; Manjusha Chintalapati; Michael Dannemann; Bradley J Nelson; Felix M Key; Pavao Rudan; Željko Kućan; Ivan Gušić; Liubov V Golovanova; Vladimir B Doronichev; Nick Patterson; David Reich; Evan E Eichler; Montgomery Slatkin; Mikkel H Schierup; Aida M Andrés; Janet Kelso; Matthias Meyer; Svante Pääbo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Mapping of the gynoecy in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia) using RAD-seq analysis.

Authors:  Hideo Matsumura; Norimichi Miyagi; Naoki Taniai; Mai Fukushima; Kazuhiko Tarora; Ayano Shudo; Naoya Urasaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.