Literature DB >> 19728371

The impact of Medicaid coverage and reimbursement on access to diagnostic mammography.

Jeremiah D Schuur1, Akash Shah, Zheyang Wu, Howard P Forman, Cary P Gross.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women of low socioeconomic status are at risk for delayed evaluation of abnormal mammograms and later stage presentations of breast cancer. Medicaid reimbursement for clinical services is lower than Medicare reimbursement, yet it is unclear whether low Medicaid reimbursement is a barrier to accessing mammography. The objective of the current study was to determine the association between reported insurance type (Medicaid vs Medicare), Medicaid reimbursement rate, and access to diagnostic mammography (DM).
METHODS: Standardized patients (SPs) called 521 mammography facilities in defined geographic regions of 11 states in 2005. Facilities were divided between high, middle, and low reimbursing states based on the state's relative Medicaid-to-Medicare reimbursement rate for DM. SPs contacted each facility twice to schedule a DM using the same clinical vignette but switching insurance status (Medicaid vs Medicare). The authors measured the proportion of SPs who were offered 1) any appointment and 2) a timely appointment, defined as a third available appointment within 20 business days.
RESULTS: SPs with Medicaid were less likely to receive an appointment than SPs with Medicare (91% vs 99.1%; difference, 8.1%; 95% confidence interval, 5.3%-10.9% [P < .001]). Among facilities that offered appointments to both callers, the proportion of timely appointments did not differ between Medicaid (93.7%) and Medicare (92.9%; P = .51). States' Medicaid reimbursement rates for DM were not associated with the percentage of SPs with Medicaid who were offered any appointment (P = .50) or a timely appointment (P = .69).
CONCLUSIONS: Callers with Medicaid were offered appointments for DM less frequently than callers with Medicare, although both were widely accepted. State Medicaid reimbursement rates did not affect access to mammography. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19728371      PMCID: PMC3723693          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  37 in total

1.  Increasing use of mammography among older, rural African American women: results from a community trial.

Authors:  Jo Anne Earp; Eugenia Eng; Michael S O'Malley; Mary Altpeter; Garth Rauscher; Linda Mayne; Holly F Mathews; Kathy S Lynch; Bahjat Qaqish
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Time to diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1991-1995.

Authors:  L S Caplan; D S May; L C Richardson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  StatBite: Percentage screened for cancer by insurance status.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Racial/ethnic disparities in time to follow-up after an abnormal mammogram.

Authors:  Rebecca Press; Olveen Carrasquillo; Robert R Sciacca; Elsa-Grace V Giardina
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Insurance status and the use of guideline therapy in the treatment of selected cancers.

Authors:  Linda C Harlan; Amanda L Greene; Limin X Clegg; Margaret Mooney; Jennifer L Stevens; Martin L Brown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Factors associated with continued participation in mammography screening.

Authors:  J K Barr; A L Franks; N C Lee; P Herther; M Schachter
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Access to orthopedic care for children with medicaid versus private insurance in California.

Authors:  D L Skaggs; S M Clemens; M G Vitale; J D Femino; R M Kay
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Telephone care management to improve cancer screening among low-income women: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Allen J Dietrich; Jonathan N Tobin; Andrea Cassells; Christina M Robinson; Mary Ann Greene; Carol Hill Sox; Michael L Beach; Katherine N DuHamel; Richard G Younge
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Recommendation for and receipt of cancer screenings among medicaid recipients 50 years and older.

Authors:  C Annette DuBard; Dorothee Schmid; Angie Yow; Anne B Rogers; William W Lawrence
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-13

10.  Insurance status and stage of cancer at diagnosis among women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael T Halpern; John Bian; Elizabeth M Ward; Nicole M Schrag; Amy Y Chen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  1 in total

1.  Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Medicaid Beneficiaries: The Role of Physician Payment and Managed Care.

Authors:  Lindsay M Sabik; Bassam Dahman; Anushree Vichare; Cathy J Bradley
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.929

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.