Literature DB >> 17562557

Insurance status and stage of cancer at diagnosis among women with breast cancer.

Michael T Halpern1, John Bian, Elizabeth M Ward, Nicole M Schrag, Amy Y Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Individuals without medical insurance or with limited insurance are less likely than those with broader insurance coverage to receive preventive services and to seek timely medical care. The authors examined the associations of insurance status with stage at diagnosis among women with breast cancer.
METHODS: This study included women age >/=40 years who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 1998 to 2003 and who were reported to the National Cancer Data Base. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to examine the associations of insurance status with more advanced-stage breast cancer at diagnosis while controlling for other patient characteristics.
RESULTS: Among the 533,715 women with breast cancer who were included in the current analysis, the proportions with advanced-stage (III/IV) cancer at diagnosis ranged from 8% among privately insured patients to 18% among uninsured patients and 19% among Medicaid patients; differences in the proportions of women with advanced-stage cancer were statistically significant (P < .0001). Regression analyses indicated that, compared with privately insured patients, uninsured patients and Medicaid patients had a greater likelihood of diagnosis at stage II (odds ratio [OR], approximately approximately 1.5) or at stages III/IV (OR, 2.4) versus stage I (P < .001). Black and Hispanic patients also were significantly more likely than white patients to be diagnosed at a more advanced stage (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study provided strong evidence that patients without health insurance or with Medicaid coverage, as well as black and Hispanic patients, were more likely to present with advanced-stage breast cancer. These results are consistent with other reports that have documented less use of preventive services, including mammography, among uninsured women and delays in diagnosis and treatment for black and Hispanic women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17562557     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  57 in total

1.  Quality of care for breast cancer for uninsured women in california under the breast and cervical cancer prevention treatment act.

Authors:  Jennifer L Malin; Allison L Diamant; Barbara Leake; Yihang Liu; Amardeep Thind; Katherine L Kahn; Eric C Schneider; Arnold M Epstein; Rose C Maly
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Effect of the Breast and Ccervical Cancer Ttreatment Act on access to screening and treatment in Oklahoma.

Authors:  Janis E Campbell; David M Thompson; Anne E Pate
Journal:  J Okla State Med Assoc       Date:  2014-01

3.  Declining mammography screening in a state Medicaid Fee-for-Service program: 1999-2008.

Authors:  Abhijeet Bhanegaonkar; S Suresh Madhavan; Rahul Khanna; Scot C Remick
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Breast Cancer Incidence by Stage Before and After Change in Screening Guidelines.

Authors:  Fangjian Guo; Yong-Fang Kuo; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Delivering high-quality and affordable care throughout the cancer care continuum.

Authors:  Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Patricia A Ganz; Denise Aberle; Amy Abernethy; Justin Bekelman; Otis Brawley; James S Goodwin; Jim C Hu; Deborah Schrag; Jennifer S Temel; Lowell Schnipper
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Population and target considerations for triple-negative breast cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Terry Hyslop; Yvonne Michael; Tiffany Avery; Hallgeir Rui
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.851

7.  Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Medicaid Beneficiaries: The Role of Physician Payment and Managed Care.

Authors:  Lindsay M Sabik; Bassam Dahman; Anushree Vichare; Cathy J Bradley
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.929

8.  Cancer outcomes in low-income elders: is there an advantage to being on Medicaid?

Authors:  Siran M Koroukian; Paul M Bakaki; Cynthia Owusu; Craig C Earle; Gregory S Cooper
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2012-07-30

9.  A comparative analysis of breast cancer stage between women enrolled in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program and women not participating in the program.

Authors:  Manxia Wu; Harland Austin; Christie R Eheman; Zachary Myles; Jacqueline Miller; Janet Royalty; A Blythe Ryerson
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Comorbidity, age, race and stage at diagnosis in colorectal cancer: a retrospective, parallel analysis of two health systems.

Authors:  S Yousuf Zafar; Amy P Abernethy; David H Abbott; Steven C Grambow; Jennifer E Marcello; James E Herndon; Krista L Rowe; Jane T Kolimaga; Leah L Zullig; Meenal B Patwardhan; Dawn T Provenzale
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.