Literature DB >> 19728120

Spinal cord stimulation: principles of past, present and future practice: a review.

Sreekumar Kunnumpurath1, Ravi Srinivasagopalan, Nalini Vadivelu.   

Abstract

Electric energy have been in use for the treatment of various ailments, including pain, since the time of Pharaohs. The theoretical basis of electrotherapy of pain was provided by the Gate Control Theory of Melzak and Wall. In 1965, Shealey et al. first introduced electrical stimulation of spinal cord for treating pain. At present spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well established form of treatment for failed back surgery syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome and refractory pain due to ischemia. The indications for SCS is growing and the technology involved in this is rapidly advancing, however, high level of scientific evidence is still lacking to support this form of therapy due to difficulties in blinding and comparing with control groups. Future developments in SCS could include, combined SCS-drug delivery system, bio feedback and closed loop systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19728120     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-009-9201-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  44 in total

1.  Spinal cord stimulation versus repeated lumbosacral spine surgery for chronic pain: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Richard B North; David H Kidd; Farrokh Farrokhi; Steven A Piantadosi
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Huge epidural hematoma after surgery for spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  A Franzini; P Ferroli; C Marras; G Broggi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 3.  Spinal cord stimulation: mechanisms of action.

Authors:  John C Oakley; Joshua P Prager
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Microcirculatory investigations to determine the effect of spinal cord stimulation for critical leg ischemia: the Dutch multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  D T Ubbink; G H Spincemaille; M H Prins; R S Reneman; M J Jacobs
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 5.  Stimulation methods for neuropathic pain control.

Authors:  M P Stojanovic
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2001-04

6.  Prospective, multicenter study of spinal cord stimulation for relief of chronic back and extremity pain.

Authors:  K J Burchiel; V C Anderson; F D Brown; R G Fessler; W A Friedman; S Pelofsky; R L Weiner; J Oakley; D Shatin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Epidural spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic pain--some predictors of success. A 15-year experience.

Authors:  K Kumar; C Toth; R K Nath; P Laing
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1998-08

8.  Electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  P Limousin; P Krack; P Pollak; A Benazzouz; C Ardouin; D Hoffmann; A L Benabid
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Mapping of sensory responses to epidural stimulation of the intraspinal neural structures in man.

Authors:  G Barolat; F Massaro; J He; S Zeme; B Ketcik
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Spinal cord stimulation in treatment of chronic benign pain: challenges in treatment planning and present status, a 22-year experience.

Authors:  Krishna Kumar; Gary Hunter; Denny Demeria
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  9 in total

1.  Safety of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients Who Routinely Use Anticoagulants.

Authors:  Hirah Khan; Vignessh Kumar; Zohal Ghulam-Jelani; Sarah E McCallum; Ellie Hobson; Vishad Sukul; Julie G Pilitsis
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 2.  Spinal stimulation for movement disorders.

Authors:  Claire Thiriez; Jean-Marc Gurruchaga; Colette Goujon; Gilles Fénelon; Stéphane Palfi
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 3.  Intrathecal drug delivery for chronic pain management-scope, limitations and future.

Authors:  M Czernicki; G Sinovich; I Mihaylov; B Nejad; S Kunnumpurath; G Kodumudi; N Vadivelu
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  Spinal stimulation for pain: future applications.

Authors:  Konstantin V Slavin
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 5.  Novel Therapies for the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain: Potential and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Pottathil Shinu; Mohamed A Morsy; Anroop B Nair; Abdulaziz K Al Mouslem; Katharigatta N Venugopala; Manoj Goyal; Monika Bansal; Shery Jacob; Pran Kishore Deb
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 6.  Interventional options for the management of refractory cancer pain--what is the evidence?

Authors:  Petra Vayne-Bossert; Banafsheh Afsharimani; Phillip Good; Paul Gray; Janet Hardy
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Fabrication and modeling of recessed traces for silicon-based neural microelectrodes.

Authors:  Nicholas F Nolta; Pejman Ghelich; Alpaslan Ersöz; Martin Han
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Spinal cord stimulation: panacea for incurable diseases?

Authors:  Jae Hang Shim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-08

9.  Limitations of spinal cord stimulation for pain management.

Authors:  Jae Hang Shim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.