Literature DB >> 19728032

Far field potentials from brain stem after transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation: optimization of stimulation and recording parameters.

Thomas Polak1, Falko Markulin, Ann-Christine Ehlis, Julia B M Langer, Thomas M Ringel, Andreas J Fallgatter.   

Abstract

The method of vagus somatosensory evoked potentials (VSEP) was introduced to easily measure the activity of vagus brain stem nuclei. In Alzheimer's disease, this measure was characterized by longer latencies as compared to controls while amplitudes did not show statistical significant differences at frontal and central recording sites. Therefore, the influence of stimulation and recording parameters on amplitudes of VSEP were systematically examined. In 20 healthy participants, VSEP measurement was done by electrical stimulation of the cutaneous representation of the vagus nerve in the external auditory channel and recording of VSEP over the scalp. The optimum stimulation intensity is 8 mA without perception of pain. There is no effect of stimulation side or gender. Maximum VSEP amplitudes are detected at bipolar recordings comprising the electrode T4 without statistically significant differences of latencies, wave shape and polarity. Thus, recordings of future examinations should be performed at 8 mA including this temporal electrode position. The reason for focussing on brain stem evoked potentials is that recent work has accumulated evidence for this area being involved in early phases of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. Improved methodological knowledge may facilitate the assessment of this non-invasive and cost-effective method in the early diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19728032     DOI: 10.1007/s00702-009-0282-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)        ISSN: 0300-9564            Impact factor:   3.575


  20 in total

1.  Far field potentials from the brain stem after transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation.

Authors:  A J Fallgatter; B Neuhauser; M J Herrmann; A-C Ehlis; A Wagener; P Scheuerpflug; K Reiners; P Riederer
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 2.  Vagus nerve stimulation: mood and cognitive effects.

Authors:  Steven C Schachter
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.937

3.  The neurophysiology of audition in bats: intensity and frequency parameters.

Authors:  A D GRINNELL
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1963-06       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Electromyographic studies on the human stapedial muscle.

Authors:  U FISCH
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1963 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.494

Review 5.  Vagus nerve stimulation therapy: a research update.

Authors:  Mark S George; Z Nahas; D E Bohning; F A Kozel; B Anderson; J-H Chae; M Lomarev; S Denslow; X Li; C Mu
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-09-24       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Age effect on far field potentials from the brain stem after transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Andreas J Fallgatter; Ann-Christine Ehlis; Thomas M Ringel; Martin J Herrmann
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  Somatosensory trigeminal evoked potentials in normal subjects and in patients with trigeminal neuralgia before and after thermocoagulation of the ganglion Gasseri.

Authors:  F Drechsler; B Neuhauser
Journal:  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1986 Aug-Sep

8.  Where does parkinson disease pathology begin in the brain?

Authors:  Kelly Del Tredici; Udo Rüb; Rob A I De Vos; Jürgen R E Bohl; Heiko Braak
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.685

9.  The trigeminal evoked potential: Part II. Intraoperative recording of short-latency responses.

Authors:  M T Stechison
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Vagus nerve stimulation: a new form of therapeutic brain stimulation.

Authors:  M S George; Z Nahas; D E Bohning; M Lomarev; S Denslow; R Osenbach; J C Ballenger
Journal:  CNS Spectr       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.790

View more
  36 in total

1.  Vagus nerve somatosensory evoked potentials in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  T Polak; D Weise; F Metzger; A C Ehlis; J B Langer; A Schramm; A J Fallgatter; J Classen
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  The relation of SMI and the VSEP in a risk sample for neurodegenerative disorders.

Authors:  Katja Hagen; Ann-Christine Ehlis; Florian B Haeussinger; Stefan Beeretz; Gina V Kromer; Sebastian Heinzel; Walter Maetzler; Gerhard W Eschweiler; Daniela Berg; Andreas J Fallgatter; Florian G Metzger
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation selectively enhances speech category learning in adults.

Authors:  Matthew K Leonard; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Fernando Llanos; Jacie R McHaney; William L Schuerman; Han G Yi
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2020-08-06

Review 4.  Anatomo-Physiologic Basis for Auricular Stimulation.

Authors:  Beniamina Mercante; Francesca Ginatempo; Andrea Manca; Francesco Melis; Paolo Enrico; Franca Deriu
Journal:  Med Acupunct       Date:  2018-06-01

5.  The effect of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on cortical excitability.

Authors:  Fioravante Capone; Giovanni Assenza; Giovanni Di Pino; Gabriella Musumeci; Federico Ranieri; Lucia Florio; Carmen Barbato; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve dermatome in the external ear is protective in rat cerebral ischemia.

Authors:  Ilknur Ay; Vitaly Napadow; Hakan Ay
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Ischemic conditioning increases strength and volitional activation of paretic muscle in chronic stroke: a pilot study.

Authors:  Allison S Hyngstrom; Spencer A Murphy; Jennifer Nguyen; Brian D Schmit; Francesco Negro; David D Gutterman; Matthew J Durand
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2018-02-08

Review 8.  Clinical neurocardiology defining the value of neuroscience-based cardiovascular therapeutics.

Authors:  Kalyanam Shivkumar; Olujimi A Ajijola; Inder Anand; J Andrew Armour; Peng-Sheng Chen; Murray Esler; Gaetano M De Ferrari; Michael C Fishbein; Jeffrey J Goldberger; Ronald M Harper; Michael J Joyner; Sahib S Khalsa; Rajesh Kumar; Richard Lane; Aman Mahajan; Sunny Po; Peter J Schwartz; Virend K Somers; Miguel Valderrabano; Marmar Vaseghi; Douglas P Zipes
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and vagus somatosensory evoked potentials (VSEP) in the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: rationale, design, methods, and first baseline data of the Vogel study.

Authors:  Thomas Polak; Martin J Herrmann; Laura D Müller; Julia B M Zeller; Andrea Katzorke; Matthias Fischer; Fabian Spielmann; Erik Weinmann; Leif Hommers; Martin Lauer; Andreas J Fallgatter; Jürgen Deckert
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 10.  Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves in cognition and disease.

Authors:  Devin Adair; Dennis Truong; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Nigel Gebodh; Helen Borges; Libby Ho; J Douglas Bremner; Bashar W Badran; Vitaly Napadow; Vincent P Clark; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.