Literature DB >> 19727877

Influence of cardiac motion on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the liver.

Thomas C Kwee1, Taro Takahara, Tetsu Niwa, Marko K Ivancevic, Gwenael Herigault, Marc Van Cauteren, Peter R Luijten.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess cardiac motion-induced signal loss in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) of the liver using dynamic DWI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three volunteers underwent dynamic coronal DWI of the liver under breathholding, in the diastolic (DWI(diast)) or systolic (DWI(syst)) cardiac phase, and with motion probing gradients (MPGs) in phase encoding (P, left-right), frequency encoding (M, superior-inferior), or slice select (S, anterior-posterior) direction. Liver-to-background contrasts (LBCs) of DWI(syst) were compared to those of DWI(diast), for both the left and right liver lobes, using nonparametric tests. Signal decrease ratios (SDRs) were calculated as (1-(LBCDWI(syst)/LBCDWI(diast))) x 100%. DWI(syst) was further analyzed to determine which direction of MPGs was most affected by cardiac motion.
RESULTS: In the left liver lobe, LBCs of DWI(syst) (median 3.35) were significantly lower (P < 0.0001) than those of DWI(diast) (median 4.84). In the right liver lobe, LBCs of DWI(syst) (median 4.17) were also significantly lower (P < 0.0001) than those of DWI(diast) (median 5.35 ). SDRs of the left and right liver lobes were 25.5% and 17.3%, respectively. In DWI(syst), the significantly lowest (P < 0.05) LBCs were observed in the M direction (left liver lobe) and P direction (right liver lobe) of MPGs.
CONCLUSION: Signal intensity of both liver lobes are affected by cardiac motion in DWI. In the left liver lobe, signal loss especially occurs in the superior-inferior direction of MPGs, whereas in the right lobe, signal loss especially occurs in the left-right direction of MPGs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19727877     DOI: 10.1007/s10334-009-0183-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  14 in total

1.  Pulsatile brain movement and associated hydrodynamics studied by magnetic resonance phase imaging. The Monro-Kellie doctrine revisited.

Authors:  D Greitz; R Wirestam; A Franck; B Nordell; C Thomsen; F Ståhlberg
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Reconstruction as a source of artifact in non-gated single-shot diffusion-weighted EPI.

Authors:  Matthew D Robson; David A Porter
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 3.  Abdominal MRI advances in the detection of liver tumours and characterisation.

Authors:  Russell N Low
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Diffusion-weighted MRI for quantification of liver fibrosis: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Bachir Taouli; Anuj J Tolia; Mariela Losada; James S Babb; Edwin S Chan; Michael A Bannan; Hillel Tobias
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: technical challenges and prospects for the future.

Authors:  Shinji Naganawa; Hisashi Kawai; Hiroshi Fukatsu; Yasuo Sakurai; Ikuo Aoki; Shunichi Miura; Takeo Mimura; Hitoshi Kanazawa; Takeo Ishigaki
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2005-12-31       Impact factor: 2.471

6.  Feasibility of diffusion-weighted imaging under split breath-hold acquisition and postprocessing (DWI-SBAP): an attempt to suppress hepatic pseudo-anisotropy.

Authors:  Katsuhiro Nasu; Yoshifumi Kuroki; Manabu Minami
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Comparison and reproducibility of ADC measurements in breathhold, respiratory triggered, and free-breathing diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver.

Authors:  Thomas C Kwee; Taro Takahara; Dow-Mu Koh; Rutger A J Nievelstein; Peter R Luijten
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in the liver: is it a reliable index for hepatic disease diagnosis?

Authors:  Katsuhiro Nasu; Yoshifumi Kuroki; Ryuzo Sekiguchi; Toshiki Kazama; Hiroto Nakajima
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2006-07

9.  Evaluation of liver diffusion isotropy and characterization of focal hepatic lesions with two single-shot echo-planar MR imaging sequences: prospective study in 66 patients.

Authors:  Bachir Taouli; Valérie Vilgrain; Erik Dumont; Jean-Luc Daire; Bo Fan; Yves Menu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Respiratory-triggered versus breath-hold diffusion-weighted MRI of liver lesions: comparison of image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient values.

Authors:  Harsh Kandpal; Raju Sharma; K S Madhusudhan; Kulwant Singh Kapoor
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  26 in total

1.  Cardiac motion in diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver: artifact and a method of correction.

Authors:  Joy Liau; Jimmy Lee; Michael E Schroeder; Claude B Sirlin; Mark Bydder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Diffusion weighted imaging in the liver.

Authors:  Petra G Kele; Eric J van der Jagt
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: usefulness of ADC values in the differential diagnosis of focal lesions and effect of ROI methods on ADC measurements.

Authors:  João Pedro Filipe; Luís Curvo-Semedo; João Casalta-Lopes; Maria Cristina Marques; Filipe Caseiro-Alves
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Liver diffusivity in healthy volunteers and patients with chronic liver disease: comparison of breathhold and free-breathing techniques.

Authors:  Mamak Eatesam; Susan M Noworolski; Phyllis C Tien; Michelle Nystrom; Jennifer L Dodge; Raphael B Merriman; Aliya Qayyum
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Intravoxel incoherent motion: application in differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma and focal nodular hyperplasia.

Authors:  Ma Luo; Ling Zhang; Xin Hua Jiang; Wei Dong Zhang
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.630

6.  Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Dailin Rong; Yize Mao; Wanming Hu; Shuhang Xu; Jun Wang; Haoqiang He; Shengping Li; Rong Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Effects of microperfusion in hepatic diffusion weighted imaging.

Authors:  Hildebrand Dijkstra; Paul Baron; Peter Kappert; Matthijs Oudkerk; Paul E Sijens
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Normal hepatic parenchyma visibility and ADC quantification on diffusion-weighted MRI at 3 T: influence of age, gender, and iron content.

Authors:  Thierry Metens; Kellen Fanstone Ferraresi; Alessandra Farchione; Christophe Moreno; Maria Antonietta Bali; Celso Matos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Motion correction of multi-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging in the liver.

Authors:  Yousef Mazaheri; Richard K G Do; Amita Shukla-Dave; Joseph O Deasy; Yonggang Lu; Oguz Akin
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Error model for reduction of cardiac and respiratory motion effects in quantitative liver DW-MRI.

Authors:  Paul Murphy; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony Gamst; Claude Sirlin; Mark Bydder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.